Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Araujo, Leandro Coelho de
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Santos, Patricia Menezes, Rodriguez, Daniel, Pezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Download full: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/142945
Summary: Climate, soil and management are the main drives for growth and production of tropical pastures. Thus, a better understanding of the effects of these factors and their interactions under climate conditions is required to obtain effective management options. Here, we used data from two field trials to research on climate and management interactions on the production seasonality of Panicum maximum Jacq. Treatments included four sampling times (250, 500, 750, and 1000 °C accumulated) during eight regrowth period, under irrigated and rainfed conditions and, cuts were made to simulate grazing intensity. All treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. At each sampling time, basal tillers were sampled to observe meristematic differentiation and were linked with the respective daylength. Soil moisture was determined, and the water availability index (WAI) was calculated. The dry matter production (DMP) was taken and relative productivity was calculated. Soil moisture was the key seasonal drive in spring-summer and the WAI could be used to adjust the maximum production for that season. The major drive for DMP in fall was the daylength, which was found at 11.81 h. For all seasons, DMP correlated better with the residues in early regrowth phase (r = 0.82 and p < 0.0001) and with degree-days at final regrowth phase (r = 0.73 p < 0.01). Applying these critical values to management guidelines should make Guinea grass DMP more efficient on tropical farms.
id USP-18_9e608eff511ba27c0d1dd318d9ecf488
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/142945
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grassdaylengthdegree-daysmombaçatropical foragewater deficit Climate, soil and management are the main drives for growth and production of tropical pastures. Thus, a better understanding of the effects of these factors and their interactions under climate conditions is required to obtain effective management options. Here, we used data from two field trials to research on climate and management interactions on the production seasonality of Panicum maximum Jacq. Treatments included four sampling times (250, 500, 750, and 1000 °C accumulated) during eight regrowth period, under irrigated and rainfed conditions and, cuts were made to simulate grazing intensity. All treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. At each sampling time, basal tillers were sampled to observe meristematic differentiation and were linked with the respective daylength. Soil moisture was determined, and the water availability index (WAI) was calculated. The dry matter production (DMP) was taken and relative productivity was calculated. Soil moisture was the key seasonal drive in spring-summer and the WAI could be used to adjust the maximum production for that season. The major drive for DMP in fall was the daylength, which was found at 11.81 h. For all seasons, DMP correlated better with the residues in early regrowth phase (r = 0.82 and p < 0.0001) and with degree-days at final regrowth phase (r = 0.73 p < 0.01). Applying these critical values to management guidelines should make Guinea grass DMP more efficient on tropical farms.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/14294510.1590/1678-992x-2016-0413Scientia Agricola; v. 75 n. 3 (2018); 191-196Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 No. 3 (2018); 191-196Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 Núm. 3 (2018); 191-1961678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/142945/137807Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo, Leandro Coelho deSantos, Patricia MenezesRodriguez, DanielPezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo2018-02-01T17:04:55Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/142945Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2018-02-01T17:04:55Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
title Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
spellingShingle Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
Araujo, Leandro Coelho de
daylength
degree-days
mombaça
tropical forage
water deficit
title_short Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
title_full Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
title_fullStr Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
title_full_unstemmed Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
title_sort Key factors that influence for seasonal production of Guinea grass
author Araujo, Leandro Coelho de
author_facet Araujo, Leandro Coelho de
Santos, Patricia Menezes
Rodriguez, Daniel
Pezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo
author_role author
author2 Santos, Patricia Menezes
Rodriguez, Daniel
Pezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araujo, Leandro Coelho de
Santos, Patricia Menezes
Rodriguez, Daniel
Pezzopane, José Ricardo Macedo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv daylength
degree-days
mombaça
tropical forage
water deficit
topic daylength
degree-days
mombaça
tropical forage
water deficit
description Climate, soil and management are the main drives for growth and production of tropical pastures. Thus, a better understanding of the effects of these factors and their interactions under climate conditions is required to obtain effective management options. Here, we used data from two field trials to research on climate and management interactions on the production seasonality of Panicum maximum Jacq. Treatments included four sampling times (250, 500, 750, and 1000 °C accumulated) during eight regrowth period, under irrigated and rainfed conditions and, cuts were made to simulate grazing intensity. All treatments were arranged in a completely randomized block design with four replications. At each sampling time, basal tillers were sampled to observe meristematic differentiation and were linked with the respective daylength. Soil moisture was determined, and the water availability index (WAI) was calculated. The dry matter production (DMP) was taken and relative productivity was calculated. Soil moisture was the key seasonal drive in spring-summer and the WAI could be used to adjust the maximum production for that season. The major drive for DMP in fall was the daylength, which was found at 11.81 h. For all seasons, DMP correlated better with the residues in early regrowth phase (r = 0.82 and p < 0.0001) and with degree-days at final regrowth phase (r = 0.73 p < 0.01). Applying these critical values to management guidelines should make Guinea grass DMP more efficient on tropical farms.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/142945
10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0413
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/142945
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0413
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/142945/137807
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 75 n. 3 (2018); 191-196
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 No. 3 (2018); 191-196
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 75 Núm. 3 (2018); 191-196
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1787713260976340992