Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sparovek, Gerd
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184666
Resumo: Sugarcane covers 10.6 Mha of Brazilian agricultural land (13 % of all cropland), mainly in the south-central region. In tropical climate conditions, the physiological characteristics of sugarcane allow a wide range of management systems with contrasting soil erosion outcomes. Models can assess these differences and the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) based models are the most frequently used. The cover-management factor (C Factor) is the USLE input variable that represents the changes in soil cover and management. We collected, compared, and evaluated sugarcane C Factor values reported in technical and scientific literature to support modelers and soil scientists on the adequate choice of these values. We analyzed references reporting primary C Factor values and sources that applied these values or described them. We found 50 references, showing a wide value variation ranging from 0.0012 to 0.5800. Thirteen references were primary sources. We found seven primary sources for Brazilian sugarcane growing conditions, but only two papers were peer-reviewed. Sugarcane C Factor modelers frequently used C values based on a poor understanding and description of the methodological and geographical origin of these values and out of the context of the specific crop management systems of application. Therefore, the results may not be compatible with the study site conditions. The primary sources lack clarity in the description of the site–specific environmental and management conditions in which the C Factors were obtained, hindering the use of these specificities by the end user.
id USP-18_a580076f4abac2d6d54c26e286243b46
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/184666
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factorbibliometric researchmodelingsoil lossSugarcane covers 10.6 Mha of Brazilian agricultural land (13 % of all cropland), mainly in the south-central region. In tropical climate conditions, the physiological characteristics of sugarcane allow a wide range of management systems with contrasting soil erosion outcomes. Models can assess these differences and the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) based models are the most frequently used. The cover-management factor (C Factor) is the USLE input variable that represents the changes in soil cover and management. We collected, compared, and evaluated sugarcane C Factor values reported in technical and scientific literature to support modelers and soil scientists on the adequate choice of these values. We analyzed references reporting primary C Factor values and sources that applied these values or described them. We found 50 references, showing a wide value variation ranging from 0.0012 to 0.5800. Thirteen references were primary sources. We found seven primary sources for Brazilian sugarcane growing conditions, but only two papers were peer-reviewed. Sugarcane C Factor modelers frequently used C values based on a poor understanding and description of the methodological and geographical origin of these values and out of the context of the specific crop management systems of application. Therefore, the results may not be compatible with the study site conditions. The primary sources lack clarity in the description of the site–specific environmental and management conditions in which the C Factors were obtained, hindering the use of these specificities by the end user.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2021-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/18466610.1590/1678-992X-2020-0234Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200234Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200234Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. Supl. 1 (2021); e202002341678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184666/170844Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Gustavo Casoni da Sparovek, Gerd 2021-04-22T15:04:07Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/184666Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-04-22T15:04:07Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
title Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
spellingShingle Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
bibliometric research
modeling
soil loss
title_short Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
title_full Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
title_fullStr Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
title_full_unstemmed Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
title_sort Scientific and technical knowledge of sugarcane cover-management USLE/RUSLE factor
author Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
author_facet Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
Sparovek, Gerd
author_role author
author2 Sparovek, Gerd
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Gustavo Casoni da
Sparovek, Gerd
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bibliometric research
modeling
soil loss
topic bibliometric research
modeling
soil loss
description Sugarcane covers 10.6 Mha of Brazilian agricultural land (13 % of all cropland), mainly in the south-central region. In tropical climate conditions, the physiological characteristics of sugarcane allow a wide range of management systems with contrasting soil erosion outcomes. Models can assess these differences and the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) based models are the most frequently used. The cover-management factor (C Factor) is the USLE input variable that represents the changes in soil cover and management. We collected, compared, and evaluated sugarcane C Factor values reported in technical and scientific literature to support modelers and soil scientists on the adequate choice of these values. We analyzed references reporting primary C Factor values and sources that applied these values or described them. We found 50 references, showing a wide value variation ranging from 0.0012 to 0.5800. Thirteen references were primary sources. We found seven primary sources for Brazilian sugarcane growing conditions, but only two papers were peer-reviewed. Sugarcane C Factor modelers frequently used C values based on a poor understanding and description of the methodological and geographical origin of these values and out of the context of the specific crop management systems of application. Therefore, the results may not be compatible with the study site conditions. The primary sources lack clarity in the description of the site–specific environmental and management conditions in which the C Factors were obtained, hindering the use of these specificities by the end user.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184666
10.1590/1678-992X-2020-0234
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184666
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992X-2020-0234
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184666/170844
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200234
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200234
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200234
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222794635542528