Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Bruno Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco, Miyazawa, Mario, Vieira, Karen Mayara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/117316
Resumo: Humic substances (HS) comprise the passive element in soil organic matter (SOM), and represent one of the soil carbon pools which may be altered by different cover crops and weed control methods. This study aimed to assess HS distribution and characteristics in an experimental coffee crop area subjected to cover crops and cultural, mechanical, and chemical weed control. The study was carried out at Londrina, in the state of Paraná, southern Brazil (23°21’30” S; 51°10’17” W). In 2008, seven weed control/cover crops were established in a randomized block design between two coffee rows as the main-plot factor per plot and soil sampling depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm and 30-40 cm) as a split-plot. HS were extracted through alkaline and acid solutions and analyzed by chromic acid wet oxidation and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Chemical attributes presented variations in the topsoil between the field conditions analyzed. Cover crop cutting and coffee tree pruning residues left on the soil surface may have interfered in nutrient cycling and the humification process. Data showed that humic substances comprised about 50 % of SOM. Although different cover crops and weed control methods did not alter humic and fulvic acid carbon content, a possible incidence of condensed aromatic structures at depth increments in fulvic acids was observed, leading to an average decrease of 53 % in the E4/E6 ratio. Humin carbon content increased 25 % in the topsoil, particularly under crop weed-control methods, probably due to high incorporation of recalcitrant structures from coffee tree pruning residues and cover crops.
id USP-18_c9c4503a5a3520a1f770d8e3728f885b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/117316
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods Humic substances (HS) comprise the passive element in soil organic matter (SOM), and represent one of the soil carbon pools which may be altered by different cover crops and weed control methods. This study aimed to assess HS distribution and characteristics in an experimental coffee crop area subjected to cover crops and cultural, mechanical, and chemical weed control. The study was carried out at Londrina, in the state of Paraná, southern Brazil (23°21’30” S; 51°10’17” W). In 2008, seven weed control/cover crops were established in a randomized block design between two coffee rows as the main-plot factor per plot and soil sampling depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm and 30-40 cm) as a split-plot. HS were extracted through alkaline and acid solutions and analyzed by chromic acid wet oxidation and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Chemical attributes presented variations in the topsoil between the field conditions analyzed. Cover crop cutting and coffee tree pruning residues left on the soil surface may have interfered in nutrient cycling and the humification process. Data showed that humic substances comprised about 50 % of SOM. Although different cover crops and weed control methods did not alter humic and fulvic acid carbon content, a possible incidence of condensed aromatic structures at depth increments in fulvic acids was observed, leading to an average decrease of 53 % in the E4/E6 ratio. Humin carbon content increased 25 % in the topsoil, particularly under crop weed-control methods, probably due to high incorporation of recalcitrant structures from coffee tree pruning residues and cover crops. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/11731610.1590/0103-9016-2015-0214Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 4 (2016); 371-378Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 4 (2016); 371-378Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 4 (2016); 371-3781678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/117316/114956Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Bruno HenriqueAraujo-Junior, Cezar FranciscoMiyazawa, MarioVieira, Karen Mayara2016-07-05T13:48:55Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/117316Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2016-07-05T13:48:55Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
title Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
spellingShingle Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
Martins, Bruno Henrique
title_short Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
title_full Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
title_fullStr Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
title_full_unstemmed Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
title_sort Humic substances and its distribution in coffee crop under cover crops and weed control methods
author Martins, Bruno Henrique
author_facet Martins, Bruno Henrique
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Miyazawa, Mario
Vieira, Karen Mayara
author_role author
author2 Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Miyazawa, Mario
Vieira, Karen Mayara
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Bruno Henrique
Araujo-Junior, Cezar Francisco
Miyazawa, Mario
Vieira, Karen Mayara
description Humic substances (HS) comprise the passive element in soil organic matter (SOM), and represent one of the soil carbon pools which may be altered by different cover crops and weed control methods. This study aimed to assess HS distribution and characteristics in an experimental coffee crop area subjected to cover crops and cultural, mechanical, and chemical weed control. The study was carried out at Londrina, in the state of Paraná, southern Brazil (23°21’30” S; 51°10’17” W). In 2008, seven weed control/cover crops were established in a randomized block design between two coffee rows as the main-plot factor per plot and soil sampling depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm and 30-40 cm) as a split-plot. HS were extracted through alkaline and acid solutions and analyzed by chromic acid wet oxidation and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Chemical attributes presented variations in the topsoil between the field conditions analyzed. Cover crop cutting and coffee tree pruning residues left on the soil surface may have interfered in nutrient cycling and the humification process. Data showed that humic substances comprised about 50 % of SOM. Although different cover crops and weed control methods did not alter humic and fulvic acid carbon content, a possible incidence of condensed aromatic structures at depth increments in fulvic acids was observed, leading to an average decrease of 53 % in the E4/E6 ratio. Humin carbon content increased 25 % in the topsoil, particularly under crop weed-control methods, probably due to high incorporation of recalcitrant structures from coffee tree pruning residues and cover crops.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/117316
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0214
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/117316
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0214
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/117316/114956
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 4 (2016); 371-378
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 4 (2016); 371-378
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 4 (2016); 371-378
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792863449088