Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121813 |
Resumo: | Cottonseed coproducts contain gossypol which can have specific effects upon the male reproductive system. We evaluated the reproductive development of male lambs close to puberty fed on three cotton coproducts. Twenty-four 5-month old male lambs received four diets: 20 % of dry matter intake of whole cottonseed (WCS), high oil cottonseed meal (CSC), cottonseed meal (CSM), and a control group (CTL) without any cottonseed coproducts. Free gossypol intake was 16.32, 6.98, 5.47 and 0 mg kg−1 BW−1 d−1 for WCS, CSC, CSM and CTL, respectively. Every 15 days, the animals were weighted and serum and semen samples were collected. After 95 days, testis samples were collected for analysis under light and transmission electron microscopes. The CTL group had higher testosterone concentrations than CSC at the end of the trial and lower total sperm defects, higher mass movement and higher scores for seminiferous epithelium than other treatments. The WCS and CSC groups showed higher levels of segmental aplasia lesion in sperm than other diets, which showed that high levels of gossypol led to higher occurrence of this lesion. Cottonseed coproducts had a negative impact on the reproductive system of pubertal lambs regardless of gossypol concentration. Therefore, the use of cottonseed coproducts to feed lambs earmarked for reproduction is not safe. |
id |
USP-18_cd7b5445188d70e4dd76bd5193189987 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/121813 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period Cottonseed coproducts contain gossypol which can have specific effects upon the male reproductive system. We evaluated the reproductive development of male lambs close to puberty fed on three cotton coproducts. Twenty-four 5-month old male lambs received four diets: 20 % of dry matter intake of whole cottonseed (WCS), high oil cottonseed meal (CSC), cottonseed meal (CSM), and a control group (CTL) without any cottonseed coproducts. Free gossypol intake was 16.32, 6.98, 5.47 and 0 mg kg−1 BW−1 d−1 for WCS, CSC, CSM and CTL, respectively. Every 15 days, the animals were weighted and serum and semen samples were collected. After 95 days, testis samples were collected for analysis under light and transmission electron microscopes. The CTL group had higher testosterone concentrations than CSC at the end of the trial and lower total sperm defects, higher mass movement and higher scores for seminiferous epithelium than other treatments. The WCS and CSC groups showed higher levels of segmental aplasia lesion in sperm than other diets, which showed that high levels of gossypol led to higher occurrence of this lesion. Cottonseed coproducts had a negative impact on the reproductive system of pubertal lambs regardless of gossypol concentration. Therefore, the use of cottonseed coproducts to feed lambs earmarked for reproduction is not safe. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/12181310.1590/0103-9016-2015-0377Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 489-497Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 489-497Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 489-4971678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121813/118675Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaim, Tiago do PradoViana, PaulineBrandão, EduardoAmador, SamaraBarbosa, TatianaCardoso, CaioLucci, Carolina MadeiraSouza, Jurandir Rodrigues deMcManus, ConceptaAbdalla, Adibe LuizLouvandini, Helder2016-10-10T20:08:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/121813Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2016-10-10T20:08:27Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
title |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
spellingShingle |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period Paim, Tiago do Prado |
title_short |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
title_full |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
title_fullStr |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
title_sort |
Impact of feeding cottonseed coproducts on reproductive system of male sheep during peripubertal period |
author |
Paim, Tiago do Prado |
author_facet |
Paim, Tiago do Prado Viana, Pauline Brandão, Eduardo Amador, Samara Barbosa, Tatiana Cardoso, Caio Lucci, Carolina Madeira Souza, Jurandir Rodrigues de McManus, Concepta Abdalla, Adibe Luiz Louvandini, Helder |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Viana, Pauline Brandão, Eduardo Amador, Samara Barbosa, Tatiana Cardoso, Caio Lucci, Carolina Madeira Souza, Jurandir Rodrigues de McManus, Concepta Abdalla, Adibe Luiz Louvandini, Helder |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paim, Tiago do Prado Viana, Pauline Brandão, Eduardo Amador, Samara Barbosa, Tatiana Cardoso, Caio Lucci, Carolina Madeira Souza, Jurandir Rodrigues de McManus, Concepta Abdalla, Adibe Luiz Louvandini, Helder |
description |
Cottonseed coproducts contain gossypol which can have specific effects upon the male reproductive system. We evaluated the reproductive development of male lambs close to puberty fed on three cotton coproducts. Twenty-four 5-month old male lambs received four diets: 20 % of dry matter intake of whole cottonseed (WCS), high oil cottonseed meal (CSC), cottonseed meal (CSM), and a control group (CTL) without any cottonseed coproducts. Free gossypol intake was 16.32, 6.98, 5.47 and 0 mg kg−1 BW−1 d−1 for WCS, CSC, CSM and CTL, respectively. Every 15 days, the animals were weighted and serum and semen samples were collected. After 95 days, testis samples were collected for analysis under light and transmission electron microscopes. The CTL group had higher testosterone concentrations than CSC at the end of the trial and lower total sperm defects, higher mass movement and higher scores for seminiferous epithelium than other treatments. The WCS and CSC groups showed higher levels of segmental aplasia lesion in sperm than other diets, which showed that high levels of gossypol led to higher occurrence of this lesion. Cottonseed coproducts had a negative impact on the reproductive system of pubertal lambs regardless of gossypol concentration. Therefore, the use of cottonseed coproducts to feed lambs earmarked for reproduction is not safe. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121813 10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0377 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121813 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0377 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/121813/118675 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Scientia Agricola |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola; v. 73 n. 6 (2016); 489-497 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 Núm. 6 (2016); 489-497 Scientia Agricola; Vol. 73 No. 6 (2016); 489-497 1678-992X 0103-9016 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222792891760640 |