Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cavalcante, Eduardo Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lacerda, Claudivan Feitosa de, Costa, Raimundo Nonato Távora, Gheyi, Hans Raj, Pinho, Luciana Luzia, Bezerra, Francisco Mardones Sérvulo, Oliveira, Adriana Cruz de, Canjá, Juvenaldo Florentino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184204
Resumo: Supplemental irrigation during dry spells could reduce maize yield losses in tropical semi-arid regions, notably in small farms. However, good quality water reserves are not sufficient to meet the demands of farming communities. Consequently, our objective was to evaluate the productivity and profitability of maize under different simulated rainfall scenarios, with and without supplemental irrigation (SI) with brackish water. The field experiments were carried out during the cropping seasons of 2018 and 2019 on Ultisol. The experiment followed a randomized block design in the split-plot scheme with four replicates. The plots were formed by simulating the water supply in the soil corresponding to four water scenarios (rainy, normal, drought and severe drought), and the sub-plots with or without SI with brackish water (Electrical conductivity of 4.5 dS m–1). Mean yields of green maize ears were 13,083, 11,532, 10,358 and 9,609 kg ha–1 for rainy, normal, drought and severe drought scenarios, as supplemented with brackish water. For the same treatments without SI the values were 11,394, 7,896, 3,913 and 1,374 kg ha–1, respectively. Data on farmer’s income showed that under normal, drought and severe drought supplementation with brackish water becomes economically advantageous from 0.9, 1.0 and 2.4 ha, respectively, while maize cultivation without SI is not advantageous under the last two scenarios. For severe drought conditions, however, SI using brackish water reduced commercial yield by 27 % with negative effects on the farmers’ profitability. In this case, it is necessary to use water with either lower salinity or select salt tolerant crops.
id USP-18_d44e33ab3c8e855e9adf7df89d935436
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/184204
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysisrainfed farmingsalinitysupplementary irrigationbiosaline agricultureSupplemental irrigation during dry spells could reduce maize yield losses in tropical semi-arid regions, notably in small farms. However, good quality water reserves are not sufficient to meet the demands of farming communities. Consequently, our objective was to evaluate the productivity and profitability of maize under different simulated rainfall scenarios, with and without supplemental irrigation (SI) with brackish water. The field experiments were carried out during the cropping seasons of 2018 and 2019 on Ultisol. The experiment followed a randomized block design in the split-plot scheme with four replicates. The plots were formed by simulating the water supply in the soil corresponding to four water scenarios (rainy, normal, drought and severe drought), and the sub-plots with or without SI with brackish water (Electrical conductivity of 4.5 dS m–1). Mean yields of green maize ears were 13,083, 11,532, 10,358 and 9,609 kg ha–1 for rainy, normal, drought and severe drought scenarios, as supplemented with brackish water. For the same treatments without SI the values were 11,394, 7,896, 3,913 and 1,374 kg ha–1, respectively. Data on farmer’s income showed that under normal, drought and severe drought supplementation with brackish water becomes economically advantageous from 0.9, 1.0 and 2.4 ha, respectively, while maize cultivation without SI is not advantageous under the last two scenarios. For severe drought conditions, however, SI using brackish water reduced commercial yield by 27 % with negative effects on the farmers’ profitability. In this case, it is necessary to use water with either lower salinity or select salt tolerant crops.Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2021-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/18420410.1590/1678-992X-2020-0151Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200151Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200151Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. Supl. 1 (2021); e202001511678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184204/170572Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricolahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavalcante, Eduardo Santos Lacerda, Claudivan Feitosa de Costa, Raimundo Nonato Távora Gheyi, Hans Raj Pinho, Luciana Luzia Bezerra, Francisco Mardones Sérvulo Oliveira, Adriana Cruz de Canjá, Juvenaldo Florentino 2021-04-22T15:04:10Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/184204Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2021-04-22T15:04:10Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
title Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
spellingShingle Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
Cavalcante, Eduardo Santos
rainfed farming
salinity
supplementary irrigation
biosaline agriculture
title_short Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
title_full Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
title_fullStr Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
title_sort Supplemental irrigation using brackish water on maize in tropical semi-arid regions of Brazil: yield and economic analysis
author Cavalcante, Eduardo Santos
author_facet Cavalcante, Eduardo Santos
Lacerda, Claudivan Feitosa de
Costa, Raimundo Nonato Távora
Gheyi, Hans Raj
Pinho, Luciana Luzia
Bezerra, Francisco Mardones Sérvulo
Oliveira, Adriana Cruz de
Canjá, Juvenaldo Florentino
author_role author
author2 Lacerda, Claudivan Feitosa de
Costa, Raimundo Nonato Távora
Gheyi, Hans Raj
Pinho, Luciana Luzia
Bezerra, Francisco Mardones Sérvulo
Oliveira, Adriana Cruz de
Canjá, Juvenaldo Florentino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalcante, Eduardo Santos
Lacerda, Claudivan Feitosa de
Costa, Raimundo Nonato Távora
Gheyi, Hans Raj
Pinho, Luciana Luzia
Bezerra, Francisco Mardones Sérvulo
Oliveira, Adriana Cruz de
Canjá, Juvenaldo Florentino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rainfed farming
salinity
supplementary irrigation
biosaline agriculture
topic rainfed farming
salinity
supplementary irrigation
biosaline agriculture
description Supplemental irrigation during dry spells could reduce maize yield losses in tropical semi-arid regions, notably in small farms. However, good quality water reserves are not sufficient to meet the demands of farming communities. Consequently, our objective was to evaluate the productivity and profitability of maize under different simulated rainfall scenarios, with and without supplemental irrigation (SI) with brackish water. The field experiments were carried out during the cropping seasons of 2018 and 2019 on Ultisol. The experiment followed a randomized block design in the split-plot scheme with four replicates. The plots were formed by simulating the water supply in the soil corresponding to four water scenarios (rainy, normal, drought and severe drought), and the sub-plots with or without SI with brackish water (Electrical conductivity of 4.5 dS m–1). Mean yields of green maize ears were 13,083, 11,532, 10,358 and 9,609 kg ha–1 for rainy, normal, drought and severe drought scenarios, as supplemented with brackish water. For the same treatments without SI the values were 11,394, 7,896, 3,913 and 1,374 kg ha–1, respectively. Data on farmer’s income showed that under normal, drought and severe drought supplementation with brackish water becomes economically advantageous from 0.9, 1.0 and 2.4 ha, respectively, while maize cultivation without SI is not advantageous under the last two scenarios. For severe drought conditions, however, SI using brackish water reduced commercial yield by 27 % with negative effects on the farmers’ profitability. In this case, it is necessary to use water with either lower salinity or select salt tolerant crops.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184204
10.1590/1678-992X-2020-0151
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184204
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-992X-2020-0151
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/184204/170572
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Agricola
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 78 n. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200151
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 Núm. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200151
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 78 No. Supl. 1 (2021); e20200151
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222794619813888