Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreno, Carmen
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Mancebo, Ignacio, Tarquis, Ana María, Moreno, Marta María
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/80614
Resumo: The use of eco-friendly mulch materials as alternatives to the standard polyethylene (PE) has become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Consequently, a comparison of mulch materials from different origins is necessary to evaluate their feasibility. Several researchers have compared the effects of mulch materials on each crop variable through univariate analysis (ANOVA). However, it is important to focus on the effect of these materials on fruit quality, because this factor decisively influences the acceptance of the final product by consumers and the industrial sector. This study aimed to analyze the information supplied by a randomized complete block experiment combined over two seasons, a principal component analysis (PCA) and a cluster analysis (CA) when studying the effects of mulch materials on the quality of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The study focused on the variability in the quality measurements and on the determination of mulch materials with a similar response to them. A comparison of the results from both types of analysis yielded complementary information. ANOVA showed the similarity of certain materials. However, considering the totality of the variables analyzed, the final interpretation was slightly complicated. PCA indicated that the juice color, the fruit firmness and the soluble solid content were the most influential factors in the total variability of a set of 12 juice and fruit variables, and CA allowed us to establish four categories of treatment: plastics (polyethylene - PE, oxo- and biodegradable materials), papers, manual weeding and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw. Oxobiodegradable and PE were most closely related based on CA.
id USP-18_fba512c3d661a95496aa94c1b3981c36
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80614
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches The use of eco-friendly mulch materials as alternatives to the standard polyethylene (PE) has become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Consequently, a comparison of mulch materials from different origins is necessary to evaluate their feasibility. Several researchers have compared the effects of mulch materials on each crop variable through univariate analysis (ANOVA). However, it is important to focus on the effect of these materials on fruit quality, because this factor decisively influences the acceptance of the final product by consumers and the industrial sector. This study aimed to analyze the information supplied by a randomized complete block experiment combined over two seasons, a principal component analysis (PCA) and a cluster analysis (CA) when studying the effects of mulch materials on the quality of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The study focused on the variability in the quality measurements and on the determination of mulch materials with a similar response to them. A comparison of the results from both types of analysis yielded complementary information. ANOVA showed the similarity of certain materials. However, considering the totality of the variables analyzed, the final interpretation was slightly complicated. PCA indicated that the juice color, the fruit firmness and the soluble solid content were the most influential factors in the total variability of a set of 12 juice and fruit variables, and CA allowed us to establish four categories of treatment: plastics (polyethylene - PE, oxo- and biodegradable materials), papers, manual weeding and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw. Oxobiodegradable and PE were most closely related based on CA. Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/8061410.1590/S0103-90162014000200004Scientia Agricola; v. 71 n. 2 (2014); 114-119Scientia Agricola; Vol. 71 Núm. 2 (2014); 114-119Scientia Agricola; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2014); 114-1191678-992X0103-9016reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/80614/84273Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreno, CarmenMancebo, IgnacioTarquis, Ana MaríaMoreno, Marta María2014-05-08T16:22:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80614Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2014-05-08T16:22:52Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
title Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
spellingShingle Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
Moreno, Carmen
title_short Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
title_full Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
title_fullStr Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
title_full_unstemmed Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
title_sort Univariate and multivariate analysis on processing tomato quality under different mulches
author Moreno, Carmen
author_facet Moreno, Carmen
Mancebo, Ignacio
Tarquis, Ana María
Moreno, Marta María
author_role author
author2 Mancebo, Ignacio
Tarquis, Ana María
Moreno, Marta María
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreno, Carmen
Mancebo, Ignacio
Tarquis, Ana María
Moreno, Marta María
description The use of eco-friendly mulch materials as alternatives to the standard polyethylene (PE) has become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Consequently, a comparison of mulch materials from different origins is necessary to evaluate their feasibility. Several researchers have compared the effects of mulch materials on each crop variable through univariate analysis (ANOVA). However, it is important to focus on the effect of these materials on fruit quality, because this factor decisively influences the acceptance of the final product by consumers and the industrial sector. This study aimed to analyze the information supplied by a randomized complete block experiment combined over two seasons, a principal component analysis (PCA) and a cluster analysis (CA) when studying the effects of mulch materials on the quality of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The study focused on the variability in the quality measurements and on the determination of mulch materials with a similar response to them. A comparison of the results from both types of analysis yielded complementary information. ANOVA showed the similarity of certain materials. However, considering the totality of the variables analyzed, the final interpretation was slightly complicated. PCA indicated that the juice color, the fruit firmness and the soluble solid content were the most influential factors in the total variability of a set of 12 juice and fruit variables, and CA allowed us to establish four categories of treatment: plastics (polyethylene - PE, oxo- and biodegradable materials), papers, manual weeding and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw. Oxobiodegradable and PE were most closely related based on CA.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/80614
10.1590/S0103-90162014000200004
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/80614
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162014000200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/80614/84273
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Scientia Agricola
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola; v. 71 n. 2 (2014); 114-119
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 71 Núm. 2 (2014); 114-119
Scientia Agricola; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2014); 114-119
1678-992X
0103-9016
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1800222792040316928