Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zeng, Huan Bei
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ying, Xiao Zhou, Chen, Guang Jun, Yang, Xia Qing, Lin, Duo Duo, Li, Zhi Jie, Liu, Hai Xiao
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/106681
Resumo: The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of an extramedullary or intramedullary tibial cutting guide leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 350 knees was performed. For the mechanical axis, frontal tibial component angle and tibial slope, there were no significant differences in the mean values or the number of outliers (±3°) between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups. A reduced tourniquet time was associated with the intramedullary guide. No significant difference in the complication rate was noted between the two groups. Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary tibial alignment was more accurate in facilitating the tibial cut. Use of an intramedullary guide results in a shorter tourniquet time and exhibits a similar complication rate as the extramedullary guide.
id USP-19_0b09e184d66a919ce85a2b248ff87cd6
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/106681
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of an extramedullary or intramedullary tibial cutting guide leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 350 knees was performed. For the mechanical axis, frontal tibial component angle and tibial slope, there were no significant differences in the mean values or the number of outliers (±3°) between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups. A reduced tourniquet time was associated with the intramedullary guide. No significant difference in the complication rate was noted between the two groups. Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary tibial alignment was more accurate in facilitating the tibial cut. Use of an intramedullary guide results in a shorter tourniquet time and exhibits a similar complication rate as the extramedullary guide. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10668110.6061/clinics/2015(10)10Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 10 (2015); 714-719Clinics; v. 70 n. 10 (2015); 714-719Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 10 (2015); 714-7191980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/106681/105297Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZeng, Huan BeiYing, Xiao ZhouChen, Guang JunYang, Xia QingLin, Duo DuoLi, Zhi JieLiu, Hai Xiao2015-10-27T16:10:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/106681Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-10-27T16:10:28Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
spellingShingle Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Zeng, Huan Bei
title_short Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
author Zeng, Huan Bei
author_facet Zeng, Huan Bei
Ying, Xiao Zhou
Chen, Guang Jun
Yang, Xia Qing
Lin, Duo Duo
Li, Zhi Jie
Liu, Hai Xiao
author_role author
author2 Ying, Xiao Zhou
Chen, Guang Jun
Yang, Xia Qing
Lin, Duo Duo
Li, Zhi Jie
Liu, Hai Xiao
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zeng, Huan Bei
Ying, Xiao Zhou
Chen, Guang Jun
Yang, Xia Qing
Lin, Duo Duo
Li, Zhi Jie
Liu, Hai Xiao
description The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of an extramedullary or intramedullary tibial cutting guide leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 350 knees was performed. For the mechanical axis, frontal tibial component angle and tibial slope, there were no significant differences in the mean values or the number of outliers (±3°) between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups. A reduced tourniquet time was associated with the intramedullary guide. No significant difference in the complication rate was noted between the two groups. Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary tibial alignment was more accurate in facilitating the tibial cut. Use of an intramedullary guide results in a shorter tourniquet time and exhibits a similar complication rate as the extramedullary guide.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/106681
10.6061/clinics/2015(10)10
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/106681
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2015(10)10
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/106681/105297
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 10 (2015); 714-719
Clinics; v. 70 n. 10 (2015); 714-719
Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 10 (2015); 714-719
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222762242932736