Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Alves, Aline Teixeira, Lucio, Adélia, Garcia, Patrícia Azevedo, Lorena, Dayanne Cristina Ramos, Sousa, João Batista de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and transcutaneous parasacral stimulation on the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in elderly people and to compare the final results between groups. METHODS: Fifty female volunteers, mean age 68.62 (±5.9) years, were randomly allocated into two groups: those receiving TTNS (G1, N=25) and those receiving transcutaneous parasacral stimulation (G2, N=25). The primary outcome was the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-OAB) score, and secondary outcomes were the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – short form (ICIQ-SF) score and 3-day bladder diary measurements. Volunteers were assessed before and after the treatment. Clinical Trials (ReBeC): RBR-9Q7J7Y. RESULTS: Both groups’ symptoms improved as measured by the ICIQ-OAB (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001) and ICIQSF (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001). In the 3-day bladder diary assessments after treatment, G1 showed a reduced number of nocturia (po0.001), urgency (po0.001) and urge urinary incontinence episodes (po0.001), whereas G2 showed only a reduced number of nocturia episodes (po0.001). No difference between groups was found. CONCLUSION: Both of the proposed treatments were effective in the improvement of OAB symptoms, but TTNS showed a reduction in a greater number of symptoms as measured by the 3-day bladder diary. No differences were found between groups.
id USP-19_13f05b01d0ea021bec2dd2d3788d5207
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/167286
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trialOveractive Urinary BladderAgedTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationLower Urinary Tract SymptomsOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and transcutaneous parasacral stimulation on the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in elderly people and to compare the final results between groups. METHODS: Fifty female volunteers, mean age 68.62 (±5.9) years, were randomly allocated into two groups: those receiving TTNS (G1, N=25) and those receiving transcutaneous parasacral stimulation (G2, N=25). The primary outcome was the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-OAB) score, and secondary outcomes were the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – short form (ICIQ-SF) score and 3-day bladder diary measurements. Volunteers were assessed before and after the treatment. Clinical Trials (ReBeC): RBR-9Q7J7Y. RESULTS: Both groups’ symptoms improved as measured by the ICIQ-OAB (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001) and ICIQSF (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001). In the 3-day bladder diary assessments after treatment, G1 showed a reduced number of nocturia (po0.001), urgency (po0.001) and urge urinary incontinence episodes (po0.001), whereas G2 showed only a reduced number of nocturia episodes (po0.001). No difference between groups was found. CONCLUSION: Both of the proposed treatments were effective in the improvement of OAB symptoms, but TTNS showed a reduction in a greater number of symptoms as measured by the 3-day bladder diary. No differences were found between groups.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-03-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1477Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1477Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e14771980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286/159703https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286/159704Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJacomo, Raquel HenriquesAlves, Aline TeixeiraLucio, AdéliaGarcia, Patrícia AzevedoLorena, Dayanne Cristina RamosSousa, João Batista de2020-03-02T18:40:22Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/167286Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-03-02T18:40:22Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
Overactive Urinary Bladder
Aged
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
title_short Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial
author Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
author_facet Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
Alves, Aline Teixeira
Lucio, Adélia
Garcia, Patrícia Azevedo
Lorena, Dayanne Cristina Ramos
Sousa, João Batista de
author_role author
author2 Alves, Aline Teixeira
Lucio, Adélia
Garcia, Patrícia Azevedo
Lorena, Dayanne Cristina Ramos
Sousa, João Batista de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jacomo, Raquel Henriques
Alves, Aline Teixeira
Lucio, Adélia
Garcia, Patrícia Azevedo
Lorena, Dayanne Cristina Ramos
Sousa, João Batista de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Overactive Urinary Bladder
Aged
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
topic Overactive Urinary Bladder
Aged
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and transcutaneous parasacral stimulation on the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in elderly people and to compare the final results between groups. METHODS: Fifty female volunteers, mean age 68.62 (±5.9) years, were randomly allocated into two groups: those receiving TTNS (G1, N=25) and those receiving transcutaneous parasacral stimulation (G2, N=25). The primary outcome was the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-OAB) score, and secondary outcomes were the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – short form (ICIQ-SF) score and 3-day bladder diary measurements. Volunteers were assessed before and after the treatment. Clinical Trials (ReBeC): RBR-9Q7J7Y. RESULTS: Both groups’ symptoms improved as measured by the ICIQ-OAB (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001) and ICIQSF (G1 = o0.001; G2 = o0.001). In the 3-day bladder diary assessments after treatment, G1 showed a reduced number of nocturia (po0.001), urgency (po0.001) and urge urinary incontinence episodes (po0.001), whereas G2 showed only a reduced number of nocturia episodes (po0.001). No difference between groups was found. CONCLUSION: Both of the proposed treatments were effective in the improvement of OAB symptoms, but TTNS showed a reduction in a greater number of symptoms as measured by the 3-day bladder diary. No differences were found between groups.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286/159703
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/167286/159704
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1477
Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1477
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1477
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222764711280640