Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Leandro Emílio Nascimento
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Navarro, Túlio Pinho, Carla Jorge, Carla Jorge, Cabrita, Henrique Antônio Berwanger de Amorim, Pires, Robinson Esteves, Figueiredo, Leonardo Brandão, Gurgel, Henrique Melo Campos, Pfeilsticker, Rudolf Moreira, Grandinetti, Helvécio, Souza, Amanda Damasceno de, Andrade, Marco Antônio Percope de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212988
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to correlate a higher Pelvic-Trochanteric Index (PTI) with an increased varus of the femoral neck with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). The secondary objective was to check whether the pelvic width changes with age. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to compare female patients diagnosed with GTPS (case group) with asymptomatic female participants (control group) from March 2011 to June 2017. On an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, lines were drawn by two radiologists, and the PTI (ratio of the distance between the greater trochanters and distance between the iliac crests) was defined and the femoral neck-shaft angle was measured. RESULTS: Data collected based on radiographs of 182 female patients (cases) and 150 female participants (controls) showed that the mean PTI was 1.09 (SD=0.01) in the case group and 1.07 (SD=0.01) in the control group (p<0.05), regardless of age. The distance between iliac crests increased with age (p<0.05) in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. It was also found that the mean femoral neck-shaft angle was 130.6° (SD=0.59) and progression of the varus angulation occurred with age in both groups, with a significance level of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The PTI was higher in patients with GTPS. The femoral neck-shaft angle does not differ between individuals with and without GTPS; however, it does decrease with age. The pelvic width tends to increase with aging in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals; therefore, the increase in the pelvic width and decrease in the femoral neck-shaft angle can be interpreted as normal in aging women, which could alter the biomechanics of the hips and pelvis.
id USP-19_1b63add6ae66faedabfec0bc3458e2d5
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/212988
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndromeHip InjuriesPelvisRadiologyTendinopathyWaist-Hip RatioOBJECTIVES: This study aimed to correlate a higher Pelvic-Trochanteric Index (PTI) with an increased varus of the femoral neck with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). The secondary objective was to check whether the pelvic width changes with age. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to compare female patients diagnosed with GTPS (case group) with asymptomatic female participants (control group) from March 2011 to June 2017. On an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, lines were drawn by two radiologists, and the PTI (ratio of the distance between the greater trochanters and distance between the iliac crests) was defined and the femoral neck-shaft angle was measured. RESULTS: Data collected based on radiographs of 182 female patients (cases) and 150 female participants (controls) showed that the mean PTI was 1.09 (SD=0.01) in the case group and 1.07 (SD=0.01) in the control group (p<0.05), regardless of age. The distance between iliac crests increased with age (p<0.05) in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. It was also found that the mean femoral neck-shaft angle was 130.6° (SD=0.59) and progression of the varus angulation occurred with age in both groups, with a significance level of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The PTI was higher in patients with GTPS. The femoral neck-shaft angle does not differ between individuals with and without GTPS; however, it does decrease with age. The pelvic width tends to increase with aging in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals; therefore, the increase in the pelvic width and decrease in the femoral neck-shaft angle can be interpreted as normal in aging women, which could alter the biomechanics of the hips and pelvis.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21298810.6061/clinics/2021/e3312Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e3312Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e3312Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e33121980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212988/195010Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Leandro Emílio NascimentoNavarro, Túlio PinhoCarla Jorge, Carla JorgeCabrita, Henrique Antônio Berwanger de AmorimPires, Robinson EstevesFigueiredo, Leonardo BrandãoGurgel, Henrique Melo CamposPfeilsticker, Rudolf MoreiraGrandinetti, HelvécioSouza, Amanda Damasceno deAndrade, Marco Antônio Percope de2023-07-06T13:04:06Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/212988Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:06Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
title Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
spellingShingle Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
Santos, Leandro Emílio Nascimento
Hip Injuries
Pelvis
Radiology
Tendinopathy
Waist-Hip Ratio
title_short Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
title_full Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
title_fullStr Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
title_sort Relationship of the Pelvic-Trochanteric Index with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
author Santos, Leandro Emílio Nascimento
author_facet Santos, Leandro Emílio Nascimento
Navarro, Túlio Pinho
Carla Jorge, Carla Jorge
Cabrita, Henrique Antônio Berwanger de Amorim
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Figueiredo, Leonardo Brandão
Gurgel, Henrique Melo Campos
Pfeilsticker, Rudolf Moreira
Grandinetti, Helvécio
Souza, Amanda Damasceno de
Andrade, Marco Antônio Percope de
author_role author
author2 Navarro, Túlio Pinho
Carla Jorge, Carla Jorge
Cabrita, Henrique Antônio Berwanger de Amorim
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Figueiredo, Leonardo Brandão
Gurgel, Henrique Melo Campos
Pfeilsticker, Rudolf Moreira
Grandinetti, Helvécio
Souza, Amanda Damasceno de
Andrade, Marco Antônio Percope de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Leandro Emílio Nascimento
Navarro, Túlio Pinho
Carla Jorge, Carla Jorge
Cabrita, Henrique Antônio Berwanger de Amorim
Pires, Robinson Esteves
Figueiredo, Leonardo Brandão
Gurgel, Henrique Melo Campos
Pfeilsticker, Rudolf Moreira
Grandinetti, Helvécio
Souza, Amanda Damasceno de
Andrade, Marco Antônio Percope de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hip Injuries
Pelvis
Radiology
Tendinopathy
Waist-Hip Ratio
topic Hip Injuries
Pelvis
Radiology
Tendinopathy
Waist-Hip Ratio
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to correlate a higher Pelvic-Trochanteric Index (PTI) with an increased varus of the femoral neck with greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). The secondary objective was to check whether the pelvic width changes with age. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted to compare female patients diagnosed with GTPS (case group) with asymptomatic female participants (control group) from March 2011 to June 2017. On an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, lines were drawn by two radiologists, and the PTI (ratio of the distance between the greater trochanters and distance between the iliac crests) was defined and the femoral neck-shaft angle was measured. RESULTS: Data collected based on radiographs of 182 female patients (cases) and 150 female participants (controls) showed that the mean PTI was 1.09 (SD=0.01) in the case group and 1.07 (SD=0.01) in the control group (p<0.05), regardless of age. The distance between iliac crests increased with age (p<0.05) in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. It was also found that the mean femoral neck-shaft angle was 130.6° (SD=0.59) and progression of the varus angulation occurred with age in both groups, with a significance level of 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The PTI was higher in patients with GTPS. The femoral neck-shaft angle does not differ between individuals with and without GTPS; however, it does decrease with age. The pelvic width tends to increase with aging in symptomatic or asymptomatic individuals; therefore, the increase in the pelvic width and decrease in the femoral neck-shaft angle can be interpreted as normal in aging women, which could alter the biomechanics of the hips and pelvis.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212988
10.6061/clinics/2021/e3312
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212988
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3312
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/212988/195010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e3312
Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e3312
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e3312
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222766185578496