Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients. |
id |
USP-19_1c33e7ecc615031c86fd02e6d8f21eff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/154707 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?Sleep ApneaObstructivePerceptionPhysiopathologyPolysomnographyQuestionnairesOBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-02-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/15470710.6061/clinics/2018/e355Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355Clinics; v. 73 (2018); e355Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e3551980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707/150761Copyright (c) 2019 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLaranjeira, Cárita de MouraBarbosa, Eline Rozária FerreiraRabahi, Marcelo Fouad2019-05-14T11:48:50Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/154707Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-05-14T11:48:50Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
title |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
spellingShingle |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura Sleep Apnea Obstructive Perception Physiopathology Polysomnography Questionnaires |
title_short |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
title_full |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
title_fullStr |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
title_sort |
Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea? |
author |
Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura |
author_facet |
Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sleep Apnea Obstructive Perception Physiopathology Polysomnography Questionnaires |
topic |
Sleep Apnea Obstructive Perception Physiopathology Polysomnography Questionnaires |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707 10.6061/clinics/2018/e355 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2018/e355 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707/150761 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355 Clinics; v. 73 (2018); e355 Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222763731910656 |