Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira, Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients.
id USP-19_1c33e7ecc615031c86fd02e6d8f21eff
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/154707
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?Sleep ApneaObstructivePerceptionPhysiopathologyPolysomnographyQuestionnairesOBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-02-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/15470710.6061/clinics/2018/e355Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355Clinics; v. 73 (2018); e355Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e3551980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707/150761Copyright (c) 2019 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLaranjeira, Cárita de MouraBarbosa, Eline Rozária FerreiraRabahi, Marcelo Fouad2019-05-14T11:48:50Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/154707Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-05-14T11:48:50Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
title Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
spellingShingle Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura
Sleep Apnea
Obstructive
Perception
Physiopathology
Polysomnography
Questionnaires
title_short Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
title_full Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
title_fullStr Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
title_full_unstemmed Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
title_sort Is subjective sleep evaluation a good predictor for obstructive sleep apnea?
author Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura
author_facet Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura
Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira
Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad
author_role author
author2 Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira
Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Laranjeira, Cárita de Moura
Barbosa, Eline Rozária Ferreira
Rabahi, Marcelo Fouad
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sleep Apnea
Obstructive
Perception
Physiopathology
Polysomnography
Questionnaires
topic Sleep Apnea
Obstructive
Perception
Physiopathology
Polysomnography
Questionnaires
description OBJECTIVE: To compare subjective sleep evaluation obtained using four questionnaires with polysomnography results for individuals with and without obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: Observational and analytical study in which individuals underwent polysomnography were studied retrospectively to investigate sleep disorders. We compared subjective data from a research database used to predict obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire, evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), sleep quality questionnaire (Mini Sleep Questionnaire) and Post-Sleep Data Collection Instrument with the self-reported total sleep time and sleep-onset latency for subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire was a good predictor for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the other instruments did not show a significant difference between healthy and sick individuals. Patients’ perceptions of their sleep onset time were significantly lower than the polysomnographic data, but this difference remained for both subjects with and without obstructive sleep apnea. No difference was found between the subjective duration of sleep and the total sleep time assessed by polysomnography in either the healthy subjects or the patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the STOP-BANG questionnaire, subjective evaluation of sleepiness, sleep quality, perception of onset, and total sleep time are not important parameters for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, which reinforces the need for an active search for better management of these patients.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707
10.6061/clinics/2018/e355
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2018/e355
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/154707/150761
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355
Clinics; v. 73 (2018); e355
Clinics; Vol. 73 (2018); e355
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222763731910656