Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shi, Chunhong
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Zhang, Ru, Bai, Ran, Liu, Dan, Wang, Yongbo, Zhang, Xueyang, Wang, Hao, Du, Jianling
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with voglibose added to combined metformin and insulin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: In this 12-week prospective, randomized, parallel trial, 70 newly diagnosed T2DM patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) X9% and/or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) X11.1 mmol/L were randomized (1:1) to receive sitagliptin 100 mg per day + metformin + insulin glargine or voglibose 0.2 mg three times daily + metformin + insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c at week 12 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The mean baseline HbA1c was 11.0% in the patients. The changes in HbA1c from baseline were -6.00% in the sitagliptin group and -3.58% in the voglibose group, and the between-group difference was -2.42% (95% CI -1.91 to -2.93, p=0.02). The differences in FPG and homeostatic model assessment of b-cell function (HOMA-b) and the change in body weight between groups from baseline were -2.95 mmol/L (p=0.04), 43.91 (p=0.01) and -2.23 kg (p=0.01), respectively. One patient (2.9%) in the sitagliptin group and three patients (8.6%) in the voglibose group exhibited hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin added to combined metformin and insulin therapy showed greater efficacy and good safety regarding hypoglycemia in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM compared with voglibose.
id USP-19_1ec930f6d2c31fb753a47a8311c9d15e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/157982
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetesDiabetes MellitusType 2Sitagliptin PhosphateVogliboseCombined TherapyEfficacySafetyOBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with voglibose added to combined metformin and insulin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: In this 12-week prospective, randomized, parallel trial, 70 newly diagnosed T2DM patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) X9% and/or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) X11.1 mmol/L were randomized (1:1) to receive sitagliptin 100 mg per day + metformin + insulin glargine or voglibose 0.2 mg three times daily + metformin + insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c at week 12 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The mean baseline HbA1c was 11.0% in the patients. The changes in HbA1c from baseline were -6.00% in the sitagliptin group and -3.58% in the voglibose group, and the between-group difference was -2.42% (95% CI -1.91 to -2.93, p=0.02). The differences in FPG and homeostatic model assessment of b-cell function (HOMA-b) and the change in body weight between groups from baseline were -2.95 mmol/L (p=0.04), 43.91 (p=0.01) and -2.23 kg (p=0.01), respectively. One patient (2.9%) in the sitagliptin group and three patients (8.6%) in the voglibose group exhibited hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin added to combined metformin and insulin therapy showed greater efficacy and good safety regarding hypoglycemia in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM compared with voglibose.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-05-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/15798210.6061/clinics/2019/e736Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e736Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e736Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e7361980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982/153246https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982/153593Copyright (c) 2019 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShi, ChunhongZhang, RuBai, RanLiu, DanWang, YongboZhang, XueyangWang, HaoDu, Jianling2019-05-24T13:16:00Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/157982Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-05-24T13:16Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
title Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
spellingShingle Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
Shi, Chunhong
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2
Sitagliptin Phosphate
Voglibose
Combined Therapy
Efficacy
Safety
title_short Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
title_full Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
title_sort Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to metformin and insulin compared with voglibose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
author Shi, Chunhong
author_facet Shi, Chunhong
Zhang, Ru
Bai, Ran
Liu, Dan
Wang, Yongbo
Zhang, Xueyang
Wang, Hao
Du, Jianling
author_role author
author2 Zhang, Ru
Bai, Ran
Liu, Dan
Wang, Yongbo
Zhang, Xueyang
Wang, Hao
Du, Jianling
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shi, Chunhong
Zhang, Ru
Bai, Ran
Liu, Dan
Wang, Yongbo
Zhang, Xueyang
Wang, Hao
Du, Jianling
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2
Sitagliptin Phosphate
Voglibose
Combined Therapy
Efficacy
Safety
topic Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2
Sitagliptin Phosphate
Voglibose
Combined Therapy
Efficacy
Safety
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin compared with voglibose added to combined metformin and insulin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: In this 12-week prospective, randomized, parallel trial, 70 newly diagnosed T2DM patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) X9% and/or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) X11.1 mmol/L were randomized (1:1) to receive sitagliptin 100 mg per day + metformin + insulin glargine or voglibose 0.2 mg three times daily + metformin + insulin glargine. Change in HbA1c at week 12 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: The mean baseline HbA1c was 11.0% in the patients. The changes in HbA1c from baseline were -6.00% in the sitagliptin group and -3.58% in the voglibose group, and the between-group difference was -2.42% (95% CI -1.91 to -2.93, p=0.02). The differences in FPG and homeostatic model assessment of b-cell function (HOMA-b) and the change in body weight between groups from baseline were -2.95 mmol/L (p=0.04), 43.91 (p=0.01) and -2.23 kg (p=0.01), respectively. One patient (2.9%) in the sitagliptin group and three patients (8.6%) in the voglibose group exhibited hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin added to combined metformin and insulin therapy showed greater efficacy and good safety regarding hypoglycemia in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM compared with voglibose.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982
10.6061/clinics/2019/e736
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2019/e736
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982/153246
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/157982/153593
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e736
Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e736
Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e736
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222764139806720