Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130850 |
Resumo: | A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was performed in January 2015 to examine the available literature on validated diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease and to describe the characteristics of the models. Studies that were designed to develop and validate diagnostic models of pre-test probability for stable coronary artery disease were included. Data regarding baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modeling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness were extracted. Ten studies involving the development of 12 models and two studies focusing on external validation were identified. Seven models were validated internally, and seven models were validated externally. Discrimination varied between studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.66-0.81) and externally (0.49-0.87). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of better performing models included sex, age, symptoms, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia as variables. Only two diagnostic models evaluated the effects on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. Most diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease have had modest success, and very few present data regarding the effects of these models on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. |
id |
USP-19_29600056430379de75ca1c98aa88e8c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/130850 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic reviewCoronary Artery DiseaseRisk AssessmentPre-Test ProbabilitySystematic ReviewDiagnosisA comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was performed in January 2015 to examine the available literature on validated diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease and to describe the characteristics of the models. Studies that were designed to develop and validate diagnostic models of pre-test probability for stable coronary artery disease were included. Data regarding baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modeling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness were extracted. Ten studies involving the development of 12 models and two studies focusing on external validation were identified. Seven models were validated internally, and seven models were validated externally. Discrimination varied between studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.66-0.81) and externally (0.49-0.87). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of better performing models included sex, age, symptoms, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia as variables. Only two diagnostic models evaluated the effects on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. Most diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease have had modest success, and very few present data regarding the effects of these models on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/13085010.6061/clinics/2017(03)10Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 3 (2017); 188-196Clinics; v. 72 n. 3 (2017); 188-196Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 3 (2017); 188-1961980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130850/127289Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHe, TingLiu, XingXu, NanaLi, YingWu, QiaoyuLiu, MeilinYuan, Hong2017-04-10T16:00:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/130850Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-04-10T16:00:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
title |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review He, Ting Coronary Artery Disease Risk Assessment Pre-Test Probability Systematic Review Diagnosis |
title_short |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
title_full |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
title_sort |
Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review |
author |
He, Ting |
author_facet |
He, Ting Liu, Xing Xu, Nana Li, Ying Wu, Qiaoyu Liu, Meilin Yuan, Hong |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Liu, Xing Xu, Nana Li, Ying Wu, Qiaoyu Liu, Meilin Yuan, Hong |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
He, Ting Liu, Xing Xu, Nana Li, Ying Wu, Qiaoyu Liu, Meilin Yuan, Hong |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Coronary Artery Disease Risk Assessment Pre-Test Probability Systematic Review Diagnosis |
topic |
Coronary Artery Disease Risk Assessment Pre-Test Probability Systematic Review Diagnosis |
description |
A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was performed in January 2015 to examine the available literature on validated diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease and to describe the characteristics of the models. Studies that were designed to develop and validate diagnostic models of pre-test probability for stable coronary artery disease were included. Data regarding baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modeling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness were extracted. Ten studies involving the development of 12 models and two studies focusing on external validation were identified. Seven models were validated internally, and seven models were validated externally. Discrimination varied between studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.66-0.81) and externally (0.49-0.87). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of better performing models included sex, age, symptoms, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia as variables. Only two diagnostic models evaluated the effects on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. Most diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease have had modest success, and very few present data regarding the effects of these models on clinical decision making processes or patient outcomes. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130850 10.6061/clinics/2017(03)10 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130850 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2017(03)10 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130850/127289 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 3 (2017); 188-196 Clinics; v. 72 n. 3 (2017); 188-196 Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 3 (2017); 188-196 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222763145756672 |