Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Penno, Luciana de Moraes, Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia, Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia, Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable.
id USP-19_3082936d7ef26698ff7c32e2f5c666c3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18495
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitustype 2Diabetes complicationsVascular diseasesVascular endotheliumInsulin INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1849510.1590/S1807-59322010001100015Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; v. 65 n. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495/20558Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas daPenno, Luciana de MoraesBertoluci, Marcello CasacciaIrigoyen, Maria CláudiaSchaan, Beatriz D'Agordinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T11:27:26Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18495Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T11:27:26Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
spellingShingle Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da
Diabetes mellitus
type 2
Diabetes complications
Vascular diseases
Vascular endothelium
Insulin
title_short Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
author Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da
author_facet Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da
Penno, Luciana de Moraes
Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia
Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
author_role author
author2 Penno, Luciana de Moraes
Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia
Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da
Penno, Luciana de Moraes
Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia
Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes mellitus
type 2
Diabetes complications
Vascular diseases
Vascular endothelium
Insulin
topic Diabetes mellitus
type 2
Diabetes complications
Vascular diseases
Vascular endothelium
Insulin
description INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495
10.1590/S1807-59322010001100015
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322010001100015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495/20558
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 11 (2010); 1139-1142
Clinics; v. 65 n. 11 (2010); 1139-1142
Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 11 (2010); 1139-1142
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222755676749824