Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable. |
id |
USP-19_3082936d7ef26698ff7c32e2f5c666c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18495 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitustype 2Diabetes complicationsVascular diseasesVascular endotheliumInsulin INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1849510.1590/S1807-59322010001100015Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; v. 65 n. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495/20558Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas daPenno, Luciana de MoraesBertoluci, Marcello CasacciaIrigoyen, Maria CláudiaSchaan, Beatriz D'Agordinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T11:27:26Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18495Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T11:27:26Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
spellingShingle |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Diabetes mellitus type 2 Diabetes complications Vascular diseases Vascular endothelium Insulin |
title_short |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_full |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_fullStr |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
title_sort |
Insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus |
author |
Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da |
author_facet |
Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Penno, Luciana de Moraes Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Penno, Luciana de Moraes Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Antônio Marcos Vargas da Penno, Luciana de Moraes Bertoluci, Marcello Casaccia Irigoyen, Maria Cláudia Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diabetes mellitus type 2 Diabetes complications Vascular diseases Vascular endothelium Insulin |
topic |
Diabetes mellitus type 2 Diabetes complications Vascular diseases Vascular endothelium Insulin |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Endothelium-dependent dilation is improved in insulin-treated diabetic patients, but this effect is probably due to improved glycemic control. The objective of the present study was to compare endothelium-dependent dilation in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes who are or are not using insulin as part of their therapy. METHODS: We studied 27 patients with type 2 diabetes (11 women, 60.3 years ± 6 years, with HbA1c < 7% and no nephropathy), including 16 patients treated with anti-diabetic agents (No-Ins, 8 women) and 11 patients treated with insulin alone or in combination with anti-diabetic agents (Ins, 3 women). Endothelial function was evaluated by the dorsal hand vein technique, which measures changes in vein diameter in response to phenylephrine, acetylcholine (endothelium-dependent vasodilation) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelium-independent vasodilation). RESULTS: Age, systolic blood pressure (No-Ins: 129.4 mmHg ± 11.8 mmHg, Ins: 134.8 mmHg ± 12.0 mmHg; P= 0.257), HbA1c, lipids and urinary albumin excretion rate [No-Ins: 9 mg/24 h (0-14.1 mg/24 h) vs. Ins: 10.6 mg/24 h (7.5-14.4 mg/24 h), P=0.398] were similar between groups. There was no difference between endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the No-Ins group (59.3% ± 26.5%) vs. the Ins group (54.0% ± 16.3%; P=0.526). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was also similar between the No-Ins (113.7% ± 35.3%) and Ins groups (111.9% ± 28.5%; P=0.888). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous insulin therapy does not interfere with venous endothelial function in type 2 diabetes when glycemic and blood pressure control are stable. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495 10.1590/S1807-59322010001100015 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322010001100015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18495/20558 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; v. 65 n. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 11 (2010); 1139-1142 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222755676749824 |