Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bonduki, Claudio Emílio, Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio, Heinke, Thais, Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569
Resumo: Objectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability.
id USP-19_3d6a227a3aeb8cfd51082ee9b0cb0d48
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/213569
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind studyGenitourinary SyndromePromestrieneOxytocinVulvovaginal AtrophyMenopauseObjectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21356910.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100116Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 1001161980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569/195646Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Liani Patricia AndradeBonduki, Claudio EmílioDardes, Rita de Cássia de MaioHeinke, ThaisPatriarca, Marisa Teresinha2023-07-06T13:04:59Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/213569Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:59Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
spellingShingle Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade
Genitourinary Syndrome
Promestriene
Oxytocin
Vulvovaginal Atrophy
Menopause
title_short Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_full Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_fullStr Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
title_sort Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
author Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade
author_facet Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade
Bonduki, Claudio Emílio
Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio
Heinke, Thais
Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha
author_role author
author2 Bonduki, Claudio Emílio
Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio
Heinke, Thais
Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade
Bonduki, Claudio Emílio
Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio
Heinke, Thais
Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Genitourinary Syndrome
Promestriene
Oxytocin
Vulvovaginal Atrophy
Menopause
topic Genitourinary Syndrome
Promestriene
Oxytocin
Vulvovaginal Atrophy
Menopause
description Objectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569
10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569
identifier_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569/195646
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116
Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100116
Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222766992982016