Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569 |
Resumo: | Objectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability. |
id |
USP-19_3d6a227a3aeb8cfd51082ee9b0cb0d48 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/213569 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind studyGenitourinary SyndromePromestrieneOxytocinVulvovaginal AtrophyMenopauseObjectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/21356910.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100116Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 1001161980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569/195646Copyright (c) 2023 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Liani Patricia AndradeBonduki, Claudio EmílioDardes, Rita de Cássia de MaioHeinke, ThaisPatriarca, Marisa Teresinha2023-07-06T13:04:59Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/213569Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:59Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
spellingShingle |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade Genitourinary Syndrome Promestriene Oxytocin Vulvovaginal Atrophy Menopause |
title_short |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_full |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_fullStr |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
title_sort |
Effects of oxytocin versus promestriene on genitourinary syndrome: a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study |
author |
Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade |
author_facet |
Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade Bonduki, Claudio Emílio Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio Heinke, Thais Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bonduki, Claudio Emílio Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio Heinke, Thais Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Liani Patricia Andrade Bonduki, Claudio Emílio Dardes, Rita de Cássia de Maio Heinke, Thais Patriarca, Marisa Teresinha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Genitourinary Syndrome Promestriene Oxytocin Vulvovaginal Atrophy Menopause |
topic |
Genitourinary Syndrome Promestriene Oxytocin Vulvovaginal Atrophy Menopause |
description |
Objectives: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the authors compared the efficacy of oxytocin with promestriene in improving vaginal atrophy of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). Methods: A total of 51 postmenopausal women with symptoms of GSM were evaluated. They were randomized into two groups: oxytocin (25 patients) and promestriene (26 patients) and were evaluated before and after 90 days of treatment; the evaluation was based on the domains of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (lubrication, satisfaction, and pain during sexual intercourse), clinical visual examination, and vaginal wall thickness. Results: After the use of the medications, both groups showed significant improvement in the three evaluated FSFI domains (p < 0.05) and there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). On clinical examination, the medications improved all the evaluated parameters but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The evaluation of the thickness of the vaginal epithelium showed that both treatments led to increase in the vaginal epithelium (p < 0.05); however, the efficacy of promestriene was higher than that of oxytocin (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both medications were effective, however, studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical applicability. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100116 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/213569/195646 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116 Clinics; v. 77 (2022); 100116 Clinics; Vol. 77 (2022); 100116 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222766992982016 |