Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zhang, Yongwen
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Han, Huanhuan, Chu, Lanfang
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842
Resumo: This study aimed to systematically review neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and establish a simplified diagnostic criterion for NPSLE. Publications from 1994 to 2018 in the database (Wanfang data (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/index.html) and China National Knowledge Internet (http://www.cnki.net)) were included. In total, 284 original case reports and 24 unpublished cases were collected, and clinical parameters were analyzed. An attempt was made to develop a set of simplified diagnostic criteria for NPSLE based on cases described in the survey and literature; moreover, and pathophysiology and management guidelines were studied. The incidence rate of NPSLE was estimated to be 12.4% of SLE patients in China. A total of 408 NPSLE patients had 652 NP events, of which 91.2% affected the central nervous system and 8.8% affected the peripheral nervous system. Five signs (manifestations, disease activity, antibodies, thrombosis, and skin lesions) showed that negative and positive predictive values were more than 70%, included in the diagnostic criteria. The specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised diagnostic criteria were significantly higher than those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (w2=13.642, 15.591, 65.010, po0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for revised diagnostic criteria was 0.962 (standard error=0.015, 95% confidence intervals [CI] =0.933–0.990), while the AUC for the ACR criteria was 0.900 (standard error=0.024, 95% CI=0.853–0.946). The AUC for the revised diagnostic criteria was different from that for the ACR criteria (Z=2.19, po0.05). Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to NPSLE is essential for the evaluation and design of effective interventions. The set of diagnostic criteria proposed here represents a simplified, reliable, and costeffective approach used to diagnose NPSLE. The revised diagnostic criteria may improve the accuracy rate for diagnosing NPSLE compared to the ACR criteria.
id USP-19_3eb2d54ef1387f41831a9ae66363e247
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/168842
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and SurveyNeuropsychiatric Lupus ErythematosusDiagnostic CriteriaManagementThis study aimed to systematically review neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and establish a simplified diagnostic criterion for NPSLE. Publications from 1994 to 2018 in the database (Wanfang data (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/index.html) and China National Knowledge Internet (http://www.cnki.net)) were included. In total, 284 original case reports and 24 unpublished cases were collected, and clinical parameters were analyzed. An attempt was made to develop a set of simplified diagnostic criteria for NPSLE based on cases described in the survey and literature; moreover, and pathophysiology and management guidelines were studied. The incidence rate of NPSLE was estimated to be 12.4% of SLE patients in China. A total of 408 NPSLE patients had 652 NP events, of which 91.2% affected the central nervous system and 8.8% affected the peripheral nervous system. Five signs (manifestations, disease activity, antibodies, thrombosis, and skin lesions) showed that negative and positive predictive values were more than 70%, included in the diagnostic criteria. The specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised diagnostic criteria were significantly higher than those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (w2=13.642, 15.591, 65.010, po0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for revised diagnostic criteria was 0.962 (standard error=0.015, 95% confidence intervals [CI] =0.933–0.990), while the AUC for the ACR criteria was 0.900 (standard error=0.024, 95% CI=0.853–0.946). The AUC for the revised diagnostic criteria was different from that for the ACR criteria (Z=2.19, po0.05). Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to NPSLE is essential for the evaluation and design of effective interventions. The set of diagnostic criteria proposed here represents a simplified, reliable, and costeffective approach used to diagnose NPSLE. The revised diagnostic criteria may improve the accuracy rate for diagnosing NPSLE compared to the ACR criteria.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/16884210.6061/clinics/2020/e1515Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1515Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1515Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e15151980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842/160251https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842/160252Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZhang, YongwenHan, HuanhuanChu, Lanfang2020-04-16T19:06:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/168842Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-04-16T19:06:58Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
title Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
spellingShingle Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
Zhang, Yongwen
Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus
Diagnostic Criteria
Management
title_short Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
title_full Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
title_fullStr Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
title_full_unstemmed Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
title_sort Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus: Future Directions and Challenges; a Systematic Review and Survey
author Zhang, Yongwen
author_facet Zhang, Yongwen
Han, Huanhuan
Chu, Lanfang
author_role author
author2 Han, Huanhuan
Chu, Lanfang
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zhang, Yongwen
Han, Huanhuan
Chu, Lanfang
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus
Diagnostic Criteria
Management
topic Neuropsychiatric Lupus Erythematosus
Diagnostic Criteria
Management
description This study aimed to systematically review neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and establish a simplified diagnostic criterion for NPSLE. Publications from 1994 to 2018 in the database (Wanfang data (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/index.html) and China National Knowledge Internet (http://www.cnki.net)) were included. In total, 284 original case reports and 24 unpublished cases were collected, and clinical parameters were analyzed. An attempt was made to develop a set of simplified diagnostic criteria for NPSLE based on cases described in the survey and literature; moreover, and pathophysiology and management guidelines were studied. The incidence rate of NPSLE was estimated to be 12.4% of SLE patients in China. A total of 408 NPSLE patients had 652 NP events, of which 91.2% affected the central nervous system and 8.8% affected the peripheral nervous system. Five signs (manifestations, disease activity, antibodies, thrombosis, and skin lesions) showed that negative and positive predictive values were more than 70%, included in the diagnostic criteria. The specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised diagnostic criteria were significantly higher than those of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (w2=13.642, 15.591, 65.010, po0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for revised diagnostic criteria was 0.962 (standard error=0.015, 95% confidence intervals [CI] =0.933–0.990), while the AUC for the ACR criteria was 0.900 (standard error=0.024, 95% CI=0.853–0.946). The AUC for the revised diagnostic criteria was different from that for the ACR criteria (Z=2.19, po0.05). Understanding the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to NPSLE is essential for the evaluation and design of effective interventions. The set of diagnostic criteria proposed here represents a simplified, reliable, and costeffective approach used to diagnose NPSLE. The revised diagnostic criteria may improve the accuracy rate for diagnosing NPSLE compared to the ACR criteria.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1515
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1515
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842/160251
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168842/160252
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1515
Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1515
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1515
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222765017464832