What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Genc, Volkan
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Sulaimanov, Marlen, Cipe, Gokhan, Basceken, Salim Ilksen, Erverdi, Nezih, Gurel, Mehmet, Aras, Nusret, Hazinedaroglu, Selcuk M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19230
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy is still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decided to review the rate and causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. METHOD: This study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies due to gallstone disease undertaken from May 1999 to June 2010. The exclusion criteria were malignancy and/or existence of gallbladder polyps detected pathologically. Patient demographics, indications for cholecystectomy, concomitant diseases, and histories of previous abdominal surgery were collected. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 5382 patients for whom LC was attempted, 5164 were included this study. The overall rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 3.16% (163 patients). There were 84 male and 79 female patients; the mean age was 52.04 years (range: 26-85). The conversion rates in male and female patients were 5.6% and 2.2%, respectively (p
id USP-19_4350c24665500c718a6ed3f9c6f6030f
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19230
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations Laparoscopic CholecystectomyAcute CholecystitisGallbladderConversionLaparoscopy OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy is still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decided to review the rate and causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. METHOD: This study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies due to gallstone disease undertaken from May 1999 to June 2010. The exclusion criteria were malignancy and/or existence of gallbladder polyps detected pathologically. Patient demographics, indications for cholecystectomy, concomitant diseases, and histories of previous abdominal surgery were collected. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 5382 patients for whom LC was attempted, 5164 were included this study. The overall rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 3.16% (163 patients). There were 84 male and 79 female patients; the mean age was 52.04 years (range: 26-85). The conversion rates in male and female patients were 5.6% and 2.2%, respectively (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1923010.1590/S1807-59322011000300009Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 3 (2011); 417-420 Clinics; v. 66 n. 3 (2011); 417-420 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 3 (2011); 417-420 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19230/21293Genc, VolkanSulaimanov, MarlenCipe, GokhanBasceken, Salim IlksenErverdi, NezihGurel, MehmetAras, NusretHazinedaroglu, Selcuk Minfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:28:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19230Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:28:47Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
title What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
spellingShingle What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
Genc, Volkan
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Acute Cholecystitis
Gallbladder
Conversion
Laparoscopy
title_short What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
title_full What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
title_fullStr What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
title_full_unstemmed What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
title_sort What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations
author Genc, Volkan
author_facet Genc, Volkan
Sulaimanov, Marlen
Cipe, Gokhan
Basceken, Salim Ilksen
Erverdi, Nezih
Gurel, Mehmet
Aras, Nusret
Hazinedaroglu, Selcuk M
author_role author
author2 Sulaimanov, Marlen
Cipe, Gokhan
Basceken, Salim Ilksen
Erverdi, Nezih
Gurel, Mehmet
Aras, Nusret
Hazinedaroglu, Selcuk M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Genc, Volkan
Sulaimanov, Marlen
Cipe, Gokhan
Basceken, Salim Ilksen
Erverdi, Nezih
Gurel, Mehmet
Aras, Nusret
Hazinedaroglu, Selcuk M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Acute Cholecystitis
Gallbladder
Conversion
Laparoscopy
topic Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Acute Cholecystitis
Gallbladder
Conversion
Laparoscopy
description OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy is still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decided to review the rate and causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. METHOD: This study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies due to gallstone disease undertaken from May 1999 to June 2010. The exclusion criteria were malignancy and/or existence of gallbladder polyps detected pathologically. Patient demographics, indications for cholecystectomy, concomitant diseases, and histories of previous abdominal surgery were collected. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion, and postoperative complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of 5382 patients for whom LC was attempted, 5164 were included this study. The overall rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 3.16% (163 patients). There were 84 male and 79 female patients; the mean age was 52.04 years (range: 26-85). The conversion rates in male and female patients were 5.6% and 2.2%, respectively (p
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19230
10.1590/S1807-59322011000300009
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19230
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322011000300009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19230/21293
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 3 (2011); 417-420
Clinics; v. 66 n. 3 (2011); 417-420
Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 3 (2011); 417-420
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222756275486720