Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold. |
id |
USP-19_514b384b5999db78faf48587f0b07c83 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/76870 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perceptionOBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7687010.1590/clin.v68i6.76870Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 6 (2013); 815-819Clinics; v. 68 n. 6 (2013); 815-819Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 6 (2013); 815-8191980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870/80732Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira deMenezes, Pedro de LemosCarnaúba, Aline Tenório LinsRodrigues, Renato Glauco de SousaLeal, Mariana de CarvalhoPereira, Liliane Desgualdoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-21T19:56:32Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/76870Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-21T19:56:32Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
title |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
spellingShingle |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de |
title_short |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
title_full |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
title_fullStr |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
title_sort |
Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception |
author |
Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de |
author_facet |
Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Menezes, Pedro de Lemos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa Leal, Mariana de Carvalho Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa Leal, Mariana de Carvalho Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Menezes, Pedro de Lemos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa Leal, Mariana de Carvalho Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870 10.1590/clin.v68i6.76870 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/clin.v68i6.76870 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870/80732 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 6 (2013); 815-819 Clinics; v. 68 n. 6 (2013); 815-819 Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 6 (2013); 815-819 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222760221278208 |