Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Menezes, Pedro de Lemos, Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins, Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa, Leal, Mariana de Carvalho, Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold.
id USP-19_514b384b5999db78faf48587f0b07c83
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/76870
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perceptionOBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7687010.1590/clin.v68i6.76870Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 6 (2013); 815-819Clinics; v. 68 n. 6 (2013); 815-819Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 6 (2013); 815-8191980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870/80732Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira deMenezes, Pedro de LemosCarnaúba, Aline Tenório LinsRodrigues, Renato Glauco de SousaLeal, Mariana de CarvalhoPereira, Liliane Desgualdoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-21T19:56:32Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/76870Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-21T19:56:32Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
title Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
spellingShingle Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
title_short Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
title_full Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
title_fullStr Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
title_full_unstemmed Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
title_sort Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception
author Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
author_facet Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa
Leal, Mariana de Carvalho
Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo
author_role author
author2 Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa
Leal, Mariana de Carvalho
Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Rodrigues, Renato Glauco de Sousa
Leal, Mariana de Carvalho
Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo
description OBJECTIVE: The audibility thresholds for the sound frequency of 137 upward- and downward-sloping audiograms showing sensorineural hearing loss were selected and analyzed in conjunction with speech recognition thresholds obtained from individuals seen at a public otolaryngology clinic to determine which frequencies in slope audiograms best represent speech recognition thresholds. METHOD: The linear regression model and mean square error were used to determine the associations between the threshold values. RESULT: The mean square error identified larger errors when using thresholds of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz than when using audibility thresholds of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The linear regression model showed a higher correlation (91%) between the audiogram thresholds for frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz than for the frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz (88%). CONCLUSION: Frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were the most significant in predicting the speech recognition threshold.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870
10.1590/clin.v68i6.76870
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/clin.v68i6.76870
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/76870/80732
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 6 (2013); 815-819
Clinics; v. 68 n. 6 (2013); 815-819
Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 6 (2013); 815-819
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222760221278208