Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101085 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To determine the range of motion and stability of the human cadaveric cervical spine after the implantation of a novel artificial disc and vertebra system by comparing an intact group and a fusion group. METHODS: Biomechanical tests were conducted on 18 human cadaveric cervical specimens. The range of motion and the stability index range of motion were measured to study the function and stability of the artificial disc and vertebra system of the intact group compared with the fusion group. RESULTS: In all cases, the artificial disc and vertebra system maintained intervertebral motion and reestablished vertebral height at the operative level. After its implantation, there was no significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) of C3-7 in all directions in the non-fusion group compared with the intact group (p>;0.05), but significant differences were detected in flexion, extension and axial rotation compared with the fusion group (p |
id |
USP-19_610b208ecbbd0ab3291259668afdf725 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/101085 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy OBJECTIVE: To determine the range of motion and stability of the human cadaveric cervical spine after the implantation of a novel artificial disc and vertebra system by comparing an intact group and a fusion group. METHODS: Biomechanical tests were conducted on 18 human cadaveric cervical specimens. The range of motion and the stability index range of motion were measured to study the function and stability of the artificial disc and vertebra system of the intact group compared with the fusion group. RESULTS: In all cases, the artificial disc and vertebra system maintained intervertebral motion and reestablished vertebral height at the operative level. After its implantation, there was no significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) of C3-7 in all directions in the non-fusion group compared with the intact group (p>;0.05), but significant differences were detected in flexion, extension and axial rotation compared with the fusion group (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10108510.6061/clinics/2015(07)06Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 7 (2015); 493-499Clinics; v. 70 n. 7 (2015); 493-499Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 7 (2015); 493-4991980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101085/99744Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDong, Jun Lu, Meng Lu, Teng Liang, Baobao Xu, Junkui Qin, Jie Cai, Xuan Huang, Sihua Wang, Dong Li, Haopeng He, Xijing 2015-07-28T16:48:23Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/101085Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-07-28T16:48:23Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
title |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
spellingShingle |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy Dong, Jun |
title_short |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
title_full |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
title_fullStr |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
title_sort |
Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy |
author |
Dong, Jun |
author_facet |
Dong, Jun Lu, Meng Lu, Teng Liang, Baobao Xu, Junkui Qin, Jie Cai, Xuan Huang, Sihua Wang, Dong Li, Haopeng He, Xijing |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lu, Meng Lu, Teng Liang, Baobao Xu, Junkui Qin, Jie Cai, Xuan Huang, Sihua Wang, Dong Li, Haopeng He, Xijing |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dong, Jun Lu, Meng Lu, Teng Liang, Baobao Xu, Junkui Qin, Jie Cai, Xuan Huang, Sihua Wang, Dong Li, Haopeng He, Xijing |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To determine the range of motion and stability of the human cadaveric cervical spine after the implantation of a novel artificial disc and vertebra system by comparing an intact group and a fusion group. METHODS: Biomechanical tests were conducted on 18 human cadaveric cervical specimens. The range of motion and the stability index range of motion were measured to study the function and stability of the artificial disc and vertebra system of the intact group compared with the fusion group. RESULTS: In all cases, the artificial disc and vertebra system maintained intervertebral motion and reestablished vertebral height at the operative level. After its implantation, there was no significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) of C3-7 in all directions in the non-fusion group compared with the intact group (p>;0.05), but significant differences were detected in flexion, extension and axial rotation compared with the fusion group (p |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101085 10.6061/clinics/2015(07)06 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101085 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2015(07)06 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/101085/99744 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 7 (2015); 493-499 Clinics; v. 70 n. 7 (2015); 493-499 Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 7 (2015); 493-499 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222762169532416 |