Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Paula Pereira, Gustavo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Bunduki, Victor, Hase, Eliane Azeka, Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira, Zugaib, Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120878
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prenatal outcomes in a cohort of fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis and determine whether performing serial ultrasounds is a good follow-up strategy. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 62 fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis. Fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis was considered when the renal pelvis measured (in millimeters) ≥5.0 to 10.0, ≥7.0 to 10.0, and ≥10.0 to 15 at ≤23 weeks 6 days, 24 to 31 weeks 6 days, and ≥32 weeks, respectively, with no uretero-calyceal dilatation. Ultrasounds were performed every 3 weeks to assess whether the mild bilateral pyelectasis regressed, remained unchanged (Group 1) or progressed (Group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 53 fetuses (85.4%), and progression was observed in 9 cases (Group 2, 14.6%). The initial renal pelvis diameter was significantly larger in fetuses with progression (p=0.028). Statistically significant differences in the renal pelvis diameter were also found at weeks 31 and 35 for both kidneys (p
id USP-19_737a6e5271fa28b4ea4f1dc8be8c6831
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/120878
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prenatal outcomes in a cohort of fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis and determine whether performing serial ultrasounds is a good follow-up strategy. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 62 fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis. Fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis was considered when the renal pelvis measured (in millimeters) ≥5.0 to 10.0, ≥7.0 to 10.0, and ≥10.0 to 15 at ≤23 weeks 6 days, 24 to 31 weeks 6 days, and ≥32 weeks, respectively, with no uretero-calyceal dilatation. Ultrasounds were performed every 3 weeks to assess whether the mild bilateral pyelectasis regressed, remained unchanged (Group 1) or progressed (Group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 53 fetuses (85.4%), and progression was observed in 9 cases (Group 2, 14.6%). The initial renal pelvis diameter was significantly larger in fetuses with progression (p=0.028). Statistically significant differences in the renal pelvis diameter were also found at weeks 31 and 35 for both kidneys (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/12087810.6061/clinics/2016(09)05Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 9 (2016); 511-516Clinics; v. 71 n. 9 (2016); 511-516Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 9 (2016); 511-5161980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120878/117939Copyright (c) 2016 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Paula Pereira, GustavoBunduki, VictorHase, Eliane AzekaFrancisco, Rossana Pulcineli VieiraZugaib, Marcelo2016-09-16T10:29:22Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/120878Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2016-09-16T10:29:22Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
title Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
spellingShingle Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
de Paula Pereira, Gustavo
title_short Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
title_full Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
title_fullStr Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
title_sort Prenatal natural history of isolated fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis
author de Paula Pereira, Gustavo
author_facet de Paula Pereira, Gustavo
Bunduki, Victor
Hase, Eliane Azeka
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib, Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Bunduki, Victor
Hase, Eliane Azeka
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib, Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Paula Pereira, Gustavo
Bunduki, Victor
Hase, Eliane Azeka
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
Zugaib, Marcelo
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prenatal outcomes in a cohort of fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis and determine whether performing serial ultrasounds is a good follow-up strategy. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 62 fetuses with mild bilateral pyelectasis. Fetal mild bilateral pyelectasis was considered when the renal pelvis measured (in millimeters) ≥5.0 to 10.0, ≥7.0 to 10.0, and ≥10.0 to 15 at ≤23 weeks 6 days, 24 to 31 weeks 6 days, and ≥32 weeks, respectively, with no uretero-calyceal dilatation. Ultrasounds were performed every 3 weeks to assess whether the mild bilateral pyelectasis regressed, remained unchanged (Group 1) or progressed (Group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 53 fetuses (85.4%), and progression was observed in 9 cases (Group 2, 14.6%). The initial renal pelvis diameter was significantly larger in fetuses with progression (p=0.028). Statistically significant differences in the renal pelvis diameter were also found at weeks 31 and 35 for both kidneys (p
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120878
10.6061/clinics/2016(09)05
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120878
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2016(09)05
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/120878/117939
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 9 (2016); 511-516
Clinics; v. 71 n. 9 (2016); 511-516
Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 9 (2016); 511-516
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222762682286080