Uterine transplantation: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/124114 |
Resumo: | Up to 15% of the reproductive population is infertile, and 3 to 5% of these cases are caused by uterine dysfunction. This abnormality generally leads women to consider surrogacy or adoption. Uterine transplantation, although still experimental, may be an option in these cases. This systematic review will outline the recommendations, surgical aspects, immunosuppressive drugs and reproductive aspects related to experimental uterine transplantation in women. |
id |
USP-19_8186a2884b657f7e5e7d7a2c2e9738c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/124114 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review Up to 15% of the reproductive population is infertile, and 3 to 5% of these cases are caused by uterine dysfunction. This abnormality generally leads women to consider surrogacy or adoption. Uterine transplantation, although still experimental, may be an option in these cases. This systematic review will outline the recommendations, surgical aspects, immunosuppressive drugs and reproductive aspects related to experimental uterine transplantation in women. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2016-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/12411410.6061/clinics/2016(11)10Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 11 (2016); 679-683Clinics; v. 71 n. 11 (2016); 679-683Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 11 (2016); 679-6831980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/124114/120272Copyright (c) 2016 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEjzenberg, DaniMendes, Luana Regina Baratelli CarelliHaddad, Luciana Bertocco de PaivaBaracat, Edmund ChadaD’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto CarneiroAndraus, Wellington2016-12-13T19:15:39Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/124114Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2016-12-13T19:15:39Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
title |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review Ejzenberg, Dani |
title_short |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
title_full |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Uterine transplantation: a systematic review |
author |
Ejzenberg, Dani |
author_facet |
Ejzenberg, Dani Mendes, Luana Regina Baratelli Carelli Haddad, Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Baracat, Edmund Chada D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Andraus, Wellington |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendes, Luana Regina Baratelli Carelli Haddad, Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Baracat, Edmund Chada D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Andraus, Wellington |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ejzenberg, Dani Mendes, Luana Regina Baratelli Carelli Haddad, Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Baracat, Edmund Chada D’Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto Carneiro Andraus, Wellington |
description |
Up to 15% of the reproductive population is infertile, and 3 to 5% of these cases are caused by uterine dysfunction. This abnormality generally leads women to consider surrogacy or adoption. Uterine transplantation, although still experimental, may be an option in these cases. This systematic review will outline the recommendations, surgical aspects, immunosuppressive drugs and reproductive aspects related to experimental uterine transplantation in women. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/124114 10.6061/clinics/2016(11)10 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/124114 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2016(11)10 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/124114/120272 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 11 (2016); 679-683 Clinics; v. 71 n. 11 (2016); 679-683 Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 11 (2016); 679-683 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222762726326272 |