Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kanashiro, Hideki
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Falci Jr, Renato, Piovisan, Affonso Celso, Saito, Fernando, Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda, Nahas, Willian Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18369
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision. INTRODUCTION: A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria. RESULTS: The mean time of surgery was 180.5 ± 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 ±8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (±23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85%), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85%), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7%). DISCUSSION: Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature.
id USP-19_8246fa671fb55e2e5f0e94d61a1e3349
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18369
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy TransplantationKidneyNephrectomyMinimally invasive proceduresLiving donor transplant OBJECTIVES: We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision. INTRODUCTION: A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria. RESULTS: The mean time of surgery was 180.5 ± 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 ±8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (±23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85%), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85%), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7%). DISCUSSION: Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1836910.1590/S1807-59322010000500008Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 5 (2010); 507-510 Clinics; v. 65 n. 5 (2010); 507-510 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 5 (2010); 507-510 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18369/20432Kanashiro, HidekiFalci Jr, RenatoPiovisan, Affonso CelsoSaito, FernandoTorricelli, Fabio Cesar MirandaNahas, Willian Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T11:17:38Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18369Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T11:17:38Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
title Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
spellingShingle Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
Kanashiro, Hideki
Transplantation
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Minimally invasive procedures
Living donor transplant
title_short Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
title_full Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
title_fullStr Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
title_sort Subcostal mini incision: a good option for donor nephrectomy
author Kanashiro, Hideki
author_facet Kanashiro, Hideki
Falci Jr, Renato
Piovisan, Affonso Celso
Saito, Fernando
Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda
Nahas, Willian Carlos
author_role author
author2 Falci Jr, Renato
Piovisan, Affonso Celso
Saito, Fernando
Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda
Nahas, Willian Carlos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kanashiro, Hideki
Falci Jr, Renato
Piovisan, Affonso Celso
Saito, Fernando
Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda
Nahas, Willian Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transplantation
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Minimally invasive procedures
Living donor transplant
topic Transplantation
Kidney
Nephrectomy
Minimally invasive procedures
Living donor transplant
description OBJECTIVES: We describe the results of over one hundred nephrectomies performed using a subcostal mini incision. INTRODUCTION: A major effort has been undertaken to encourage living donor renal transplantation. New techniques that use minimally invasive approaches to perform donor nephrectomy have been progressively accepted. Among these new procedures is the mini-incision approach. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed one hundred and seventeen consecutive donors that were subjected to subcostal mini-incision nephrectomy at a single center. Surgical time, warm and cold ischemia time, intraoperative complications, time until hospital discharge, presence of infection, bleeding, the need for a second operation, and death were analyzed. Eventual loss of donor renal function was indicated by increases in serum creatinine and proteinuria. RESULTS: The mean time of surgery was 180.5 ± 26.2 minutes. The mean warm ischemia time was 93 ±8.3 seconds, while the mean cold ischemia time was 85.9 (±23.5) minutes. We had one case with an intraoperative complication, and only two patients required another operation. An intra-abdominal abscess occurred in one patient (0.85%), proteinuria occurred in one patient (0.85%), and a transitory increase of creatinine levels occurred in two patients (1.7%). DISCUSSION: Reducing the length of the abdominal incision did not influence surgical time or result in an increase in intraoperative complications relative to our historical data or literature reports. Organ preparation was accomplished successfully with a brief warm ischemia time. Additionally, the mean hospital stay was short, and few surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The use of a subcostal mini incision is both safe and similar to conventional techniques previously described in the literature.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18369
10.1590/S1807-59322010000500008
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18369
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322010000500008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18369/20432
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 5 (2010); 507-510
Clinics; v. 65 n. 5 (2010); 507-510
Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 5 (2010); 507-510
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222755226910720