Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19423 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: Data on the factors that contribute to the antibody response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients are scarce. The current study was conducted on a group of peritoneal dialysis patients to learn how the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination varies according to the patient's clearance of urea normalized to total body water (Kt/V). METHODS: A convenience sample of 33 peritoneal dialysis patients (13 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 49¡12 years) was administered double doses (20 μg IM in each deltoid muscle) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Response to immunization was measured at one to three months after the final dose of vaccine. The subjects were divided into groups according to the level of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), including non-responders ( < 10 IU/L), weak responders (10-100 IU/L), and good responders ( > 100 IU/L). RESULTS: Among non-responders, weak responders, and good responders, significant differences were found in age (54 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 9 vs. 45¡12 years, respectively; p = 0.049) and recombinant human erythropoietin use (20 vs. 29 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.016). No significant differences in weekly total Kt/V (p = 0.704), weekly peritoneal Kt/V (p = 0.064) and residual glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.355) were found across the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delivered clearance measured by weekly peritoneal Kt/V and total clearance measured by weekly total Kt/V did not predict the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients on peritoneal dialysis. |
id |
USP-19_83c8758b8e14325536bf3dd46bcd58d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19423 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisHepatitis B virusVaccinationDialysis adequacyKt/V OBJECTIVES: Data on the factors that contribute to the antibody response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients are scarce. The current study was conducted on a group of peritoneal dialysis patients to learn how the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination varies according to the patient's clearance of urea normalized to total body water (Kt/V). METHODS: A convenience sample of 33 peritoneal dialysis patients (13 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 49¡12 years) was administered double doses (20 μg IM in each deltoid muscle) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Response to immunization was measured at one to three months after the final dose of vaccine. The subjects were divided into groups according to the level of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), including non-responders ( < 10 IU/L), weak responders (10-100 IU/L), and good responders ( > 100 IU/L). RESULTS: Among non-responders, weak responders, and good responders, significant differences were found in age (54 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 9 vs. 45¡12 years, respectively; p = 0.049) and recombinant human erythropoietin use (20 vs. 29 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.016). No significant differences in weekly total Kt/V (p = 0.704), weekly peritoneal Kt/V (p = 0.064) and residual glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.355) were found across the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delivered clearance measured by weekly peritoneal Kt/V and total clearance measured by weekly total Kt/V did not predict the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1942310.1590/S1807-59322011000900009Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 Clinics; v. 66 n. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19423/21486Dervisoglu, ErkanSimsek, MelihYilmaz, Ahmetinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:40:04Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19423Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:40:04Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
title |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
spellingShingle |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? Dervisoglu, Erkan Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Hepatitis B virus Vaccination Dialysis adequacy Kt/V |
title_short |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
title_full |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
title_fullStr |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
title_sort |
Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter? |
author |
Dervisoglu, Erkan |
author_facet |
Dervisoglu, Erkan Simsek, Melih Yilmaz, Ahmet |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simsek, Melih Yilmaz, Ahmet |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dervisoglu, Erkan Simsek, Melih Yilmaz, Ahmet |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Hepatitis B virus Vaccination Dialysis adequacy Kt/V |
topic |
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis Hepatitis B virus Vaccination Dialysis adequacy Kt/V |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Data on the factors that contribute to the antibody response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients are scarce. The current study was conducted on a group of peritoneal dialysis patients to learn how the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination varies according to the patient's clearance of urea normalized to total body water (Kt/V). METHODS: A convenience sample of 33 peritoneal dialysis patients (13 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 49¡12 years) was administered double doses (20 μg IM in each deltoid muscle) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Response to immunization was measured at one to three months after the final dose of vaccine. The subjects were divided into groups according to the level of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), including non-responders ( < 10 IU/L), weak responders (10-100 IU/L), and good responders ( > 100 IU/L). RESULTS: Among non-responders, weak responders, and good responders, significant differences were found in age (54 ± 12 vs. 56 ± 9 vs. 45¡12 years, respectively; p = 0.049) and recombinant human erythropoietin use (20 vs. 29 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.016). No significant differences in weekly total Kt/V (p = 0.704), weekly peritoneal Kt/V (p = 0.064) and residual glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.355) were found across the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Delivered clearance measured by weekly peritoneal Kt/V and total clearance measured by weekly total Kt/V did not predict the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients on peritoneal dialysis. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19423 10.1590/S1807-59322011000900009 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19423 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322011000900009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19423/21486 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 Clinics; v. 66 n. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 9 (2011); 1559-1562 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222757249613824 |