Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Dénes, Francisco T., Nahas, William Carlos, Simões, Fabiano A., Colombo Jr., José Roberto, Piovesan, Affonso C., Chambô, José L., Arap, Sami, Srougi, Miguel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17872
Resumo: PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p
id USP-19_8e95b2eb1e677c35f7efa2fbb4f91eb3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17872
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy Donor nephrectomyKidney transplantationLaparoscopySurgical approachesOutcomes PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (pHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1787210.1590/S1807-59322009000100005Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 23-28 Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 23-28 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 23-28 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17872/19937Mitre, Anuar IbrahimDénes, Francisco T.Nahas, William CarlosSimões, Fabiano A.Colombo Jr., José RobertoPiovesan, Affonso C.Chambô, José L.Arap, SamiSrougi, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:41:12Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17872Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:41:12Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
spellingShingle Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Donor nephrectomy
Kidney transplantation
Laparoscopy
Surgical approaches
Outcomes
title_short Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_full Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_fullStr Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
title_sort Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy
author Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
author_facet Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Dénes, Francisco T.
Nahas, William Carlos
Simões, Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr., José Roberto
Piovesan, Affonso C.
Chambô, José L.
Arap, Sami
Srougi, Miguel
author_role author
author2 Dénes, Francisco T.
Nahas, William Carlos
Simões, Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr., José Roberto
Piovesan, Affonso C.
Chambô, José L.
Arap, Sami
Srougi, Miguel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
Dénes, Francisco T.
Nahas, William Carlos
Simões, Fabiano A.
Colombo Jr., José Roberto
Piovesan, Affonso C.
Chambô, José L.
Arap, Sami
Srougi, Miguel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Donor nephrectomy
Kidney transplantation
Laparoscopy
Surgical approaches
Outcomes
topic Donor nephrectomy
Kidney transplantation
Laparoscopy
Surgical approaches
Outcomes
description PURPOSE: Living donor nephrectomy is usually performed by a retroperitoneal flank incision. Due to the significant morbidity and long recovery time for a flank incision, anterior extra peritoneal sub-costal and transperitoneal video-laparoscopic methods have been described for donor nephrectomy. We prospectively compare the long-term results of donors as well as functional recipients submitted to these three approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 live donor renal transplantations were prospectively evaluated from May 2001 to January 2004. Donors were compared with regard to operative and warm ischemia time, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and complications. Recipients were compared with regard to graft function, acute cellular rejection, surgical complications, and graft and recipient survival. RESULTS: The mean operative and warm ischemia times were longer in the video-laparoscopic group (p
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17872
10.1590/S1807-59322009000100005
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17872
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322009000100005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17872/19937
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 23-28
Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 23-28
Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 23-28
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1824324333420412928

Registros relacionados