Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Peng, Ke
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Wu, Shao-ru, Ji, Fu-hai, Li, Jian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96919
Resumo: Premedication is important in pediatric anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of dexmedetomidine as a premedicant for pediatric patients. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine premedication with midazolam or ketamine premedication or placebo in children. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. The original data were pooled for the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5. The main parameters investigated included satisfactory separation from parents, satisfactory mask induction, postoperative rescue analgesia, emergence agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients were included. When compared with midazolam, premedication with dexmedetomidine resulted in an increase in satisfactory separation from parents (RD = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.30, p = 0.003) and a decrease in the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (RD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.09, p = 0.0003). Children treated with dexmedetomidine had a lower heart rate before induction. The incidence of satisfactory mask induction, emergence agitation and PONV did not differ between the groups. Dexmedetomidine was superior in providing satisfactory intravenous cannulation compared to placebo. This meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam premedication because it resulted in enhanced preoperative sedation and decreased postoperative pain. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the dosing schemes and long-term outcomes of dexmedetomidine premedication in pediatric anesthesia.
id USP-19_94085fa1e6bbb282f28a504d158deee4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/96919
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Premedication is important in pediatric anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of dexmedetomidine as a premedicant for pediatric patients. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine premedication with midazolam or ketamine premedication or placebo in children. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. The original data were pooled for the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5. The main parameters investigated included satisfactory separation from parents, satisfactory mask induction, postoperative rescue analgesia, emergence agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients were included. When compared with midazolam, premedication with dexmedetomidine resulted in an increase in satisfactory separation from parents (RD = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.30, p = 0.003) and a decrease in the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (RD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.09, p = 0.0003). Children treated with dexmedetomidine had a lower heart rate before induction. The incidence of satisfactory mask induction, emergence agitation and PONV did not differ between the groups. Dexmedetomidine was superior in providing satisfactory intravenous cannulation compared to placebo. This meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam premedication because it resulted in enhanced preoperative sedation and decreased postoperative pain. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the dosing schemes and long-term outcomes of dexmedetomidine premedication in pediatric anesthesia. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2014-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/9691910.6061/clinics/2014(11)12Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 11 (2014); 777-786Clinics; v. 69 n. 11 (2014); 777-786Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 11 (2014); 777-7861980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96919/95999Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeng, Ke Wu, Shao-ru Ji, Fu-hai Li, Jian 2015-03-27T18:21:03Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/96919Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-03-27T18:21:03Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Peng, Ke
title_short Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Peng, Ke
author_facet Peng, Ke
Wu, Shao-ru
Ji, Fu-hai
Li, Jian
author_role author
author2 Wu, Shao-ru
Ji, Fu-hai
Li, Jian
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peng, Ke
Wu, Shao-ru
Ji, Fu-hai
Li, Jian
description Premedication is important in pediatric anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of dexmedetomidine as a premedicant for pediatric patients. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine premedication with midazolam or ketamine premedication or placebo in children. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. The original data were pooled for the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5. The main parameters investigated included satisfactory separation from parents, satisfactory mask induction, postoperative rescue analgesia, emergence agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 1190 patients were included. When compared with midazolam, premedication with dexmedetomidine resulted in an increase in satisfactory separation from parents (RD = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.30, p = 0.003) and a decrease in the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (RD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.09, p = 0.0003). Children treated with dexmedetomidine had a lower heart rate before induction. The incidence of satisfactory mask induction, emergence agitation and PONV did not differ between the groups. Dexmedetomidine was superior in providing satisfactory intravenous cannulation compared to placebo. This meta-analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam premedication because it resulted in enhanced preoperative sedation and decreased postoperative pain. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the dosing schemes and long-term outcomes of dexmedetomidine premedication in pediatric anesthesia.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96919
10.6061/clinics/2014(11)12
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96919
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2014(11)12
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96919/95999
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 69 No. 11 (2014); 777-786
Clinics; v. 69 n. 11 (2014); 777-786
Clinics; Vol. 69 Núm. 11 (2014); 777-786
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761657827328