Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mezzalira, Raquel
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira, do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky, Marcia Maria, Brugnera, Cibele, Grasel, Signe Schuster
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/138271
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study compared the results of the caloric test with those of the video head impulse test obtained during the same session and evaluated whether the former can be used to screen for non-acute vestibular dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 157 participants complaining of dizziness with vestibular characteristics of varying durations and clinical courses completed the caloric test and video head impulse test. RESULTS: Significantly more caloric test results than video head impulse test results were abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the caloric test and video head impulse test are distinct but complement each other. Within our sample, the caloric test was more sensitive for vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, the video head impulse test is not a suitable screening tool of the vestibular system in patients with chronic complaints.
id USP-19_94ba326b2e3ceffd3a149bf6e3bdeafd
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/138271
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaintsCaloric TestVideo Head Impulse TestVestibular Ocular ReflexVertigoOBJECTIVE: This study compared the results of the caloric test with those of the video head impulse test obtained during the same session and evaluated whether the former can be used to screen for non-acute vestibular dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 157 participants complaining of dizziness with vestibular characteristics of varying durations and clinical courses completed the caloric test and video head impulse test. RESULTS: Significantly more caloric test results than video head impulse test results were abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the caloric test and video head impulse test are distinct but complement each other. Within our sample, the caloric test was more sensitive for vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, the video head impulse test is not a suitable screening tool of the vestibular system in patients with chronic complaints.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/13827110.6061/clinics/2017(08)03Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 8 (2017); 469-473Clinics; v. 72 n. 8 (2017); 469-473Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 8 (2017); 469-4731980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/138271/133712Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMezzalira, RaquelBittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreirado Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky, Marcia MariaBrugnera, CibeleGrasel, Signe Schuster2017-09-22T16:20:24Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/138271Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-09-22T16:20:24Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
title Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
spellingShingle Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
Mezzalira, Raquel
Caloric Test
Video Head Impulse Test
Vestibular Ocular Reflex
Vertigo
title_short Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
title_full Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
title_fullStr Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
title_sort Sensitivity of caloric test and video head impulse as screening test for chronic vestibular complaints
author Mezzalira, Raquel
author_facet Mezzalira, Raquel
Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky, Marcia Maria
Brugnera, Cibele
Grasel, Signe Schuster
author_role author
author2 Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky, Marcia Maria
Brugnera, Cibele
Grasel, Signe Schuster
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mezzalira, Raquel
Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
do Carmo Bilécki-Stipsky, Marcia Maria
Brugnera, Cibele
Grasel, Signe Schuster
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caloric Test
Video Head Impulse Test
Vestibular Ocular Reflex
Vertigo
topic Caloric Test
Video Head Impulse Test
Vestibular Ocular Reflex
Vertigo
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared the results of the caloric test with those of the video head impulse test obtained during the same session and evaluated whether the former can be used to screen for non-acute vestibular dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 157 participants complaining of dizziness with vestibular characteristics of varying durations and clinical courses completed the caloric test and video head impulse test. RESULTS: Significantly more caloric test results than video head impulse test results were abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the caloric test and video head impulse test are distinct but complement each other. Within our sample, the caloric test was more sensitive for vestibular dysfunction. Therefore, the video head impulse test is not a suitable screening tool of the vestibular system in patients with chronic complaints.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/138271
10.6061/clinics/2017(08)03
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/138271
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2017(08)03
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/138271/133712
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 8 (2017); 469-473
Clinics; v. 72 n. 8 (2017); 469-473
Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 8 (2017); 469-473
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222763223351296

Registros relacionados