The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19391 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. METHODS: The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 72.4%. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) CONCLUSION: All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients. |
id |
USP-19_b530b017e71d2b81efa3e5ef019d470d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19391 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients CAM-ICUICDSCCAM-ICU FlowsheetCritical careDelirium OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. METHODS: The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 72.4%. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) CONCLUSION: All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1939110.1590/S1807-59322011001100011Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 Clinics; v. 66 n. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19391/21454Gusmao-Flores, DimitriSalluh, Jorge Ibrain FigueiraDal-Pizzol, FelipeRitter, CristianeTomasi, Cristiane DamianiLima, Marco Antônio Sales Dantas deSantana, Lauro ReisLins, Rita Márcia PachecoLemos, Patrícia PimentaSerpa, Gisele VasconcelosOliveira, JenissonChalhub, Ricardo ÁvilaPitrowsky, Melissa TassanoLacerda, Acioly L.TKoenen, Karestan CQuarantini, Lucas Cinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:37:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19391Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:37:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
title |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
spellingShingle |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri CAM-ICU ICDSC CAM-ICU Flowsheet Critical care Delirium |
title_short |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
title_full |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
title_fullStr |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
title_sort |
The validity and reliability of the portuguese versions of three tools used to diagnose delirium in critically ill patients |
author |
Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri |
author_facet |
Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Ritter, Cristiane Tomasi, Cristiane Damiani Lima, Marco Antônio Sales Dantas de Santana, Lauro Reis Lins, Rita Márcia Pacheco Lemos, Patrícia Pimenta Serpa, Gisele Vasconcelos Oliveira, Jenisson Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Pitrowsky, Melissa Tassano Lacerda, Acioly L.T Koenen, Karestan C Quarantini, Lucas C |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Ritter, Cristiane Tomasi, Cristiane Damiani Lima, Marco Antônio Sales Dantas de Santana, Lauro Reis Lins, Rita Márcia Pacheco Lemos, Patrícia Pimenta Serpa, Gisele Vasconcelos Oliveira, Jenisson Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Pitrowsky, Melissa Tassano Lacerda, Acioly L.T Koenen, Karestan C Quarantini, Lucas C |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira Dal-Pizzol, Felipe Ritter, Cristiane Tomasi, Cristiane Damiani Lima, Marco Antônio Sales Dantas de Santana, Lauro Reis Lins, Rita Márcia Pacheco Lemos, Patrícia Pimenta Serpa, Gisele Vasconcelos Oliveira, Jenisson Chalhub, Ricardo Ávila Pitrowsky, Melissa Tassano Lacerda, Acioly L.T Koenen, Karestan C Quarantini, Lucas C |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CAM-ICU ICDSC CAM-ICU Flowsheet Critical care Delirium |
topic |
CAM-ICU ICDSC CAM-ICU Flowsheet Critical care Delirium |
description |
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. METHODS: The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 72.4%. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) CONCLUSION: All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19391 10.1590/S1807-59322011001100011 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19391 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322011001100011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19391/21454 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 Clinics; v. 66 n. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 11 (2011); 1917-1922 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222756878417920 |