The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
DOI: | 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1508 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that infection or inflammation is a major contributor to early spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the development and causes of maternal infection associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with sPTB. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study with a nested case–control component, the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP), conducted from April 2011 to July 2012 in 20 Brazilian referral obstetric hospitals. Women with preterm birth (PTB) and their neonates were enrolled. In this analysis, 2,682 women undergoing spontaneous preterm labor and premature pre-labor rupture of membranes were included. Two groups were identified based on self-reports or prenatal or hospital records: women with at least one infection factor and women without any maternal infection (vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection, or dental infection). A bivariate analysis was performed to identify potential individual risk factors for PTB. The odds ratios (ORs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The majority of women with sPTB fulfilled at least one criterion for the identification of maternal infection (65.9%), and more than half reported having urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Approximately 9.6% of women with PTB and maternal infection were classified as having periodontal infection only. Apart from the presence of a partner, which was more common among women with infectious diseases (p=0.026; OR, 1.28 [1.03–1.59]), other variables did not show any significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Maternal infection was highly prevalent in all cases of sPTBs, although it was not clearly associated with the type of PTB, gestational age, or any adverse neonatal outcomes. |
id |
USP-19_c057f28fef6fa306f8c40b4978f5aff9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/168269 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
spelling |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP)Preterm BirthPrematurityMaternal InfectionNeonatal HealthOBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that infection or inflammation is a major contributor to early spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the development and causes of maternal infection associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with sPTB. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study with a nested case–control component, the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP), conducted from April 2011 to July 2012 in 20 Brazilian referral obstetric hospitals. Women with preterm birth (PTB) and their neonates were enrolled. In this analysis, 2,682 women undergoing spontaneous preterm labor and premature pre-labor rupture of membranes were included. Two groups were identified based on self-reports or prenatal or hospital records: women with at least one infection factor and women without any maternal infection (vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection, or dental infection). A bivariate analysis was performed to identify potential individual risk factors for PTB. The odds ratios (ORs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The majority of women with sPTB fulfilled at least one criterion for the identification of maternal infection (65.9%), and more than half reported having urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Approximately 9.6% of women with PTB and maternal infection were classified as having periodontal infection only. Apart from the presence of a partner, which was more common among women with infectious diseases (p=0.026; OR, 1.28 [1.03–1.59]), other variables did not show any significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Maternal infection was highly prevalent in all cases of sPTBs, although it was not clearly associated with the type of PTB, gestational age, or any adverse neonatal outcomes.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/16826910.6061/clinics/2020/e1508Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1508Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1508Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e15081980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269/160059https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269/160060Copyright (c) 2020 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTedesco, Ricardo P.Galvão, Rafael B.Guida, Jose PauloPassini-Júnior, RenatoLajos, Giuliane J.Nomura, Marcelo L.Rehder, Patricia M.Dias, Tabata Z.Souza, Renato T.Cecatti, Jose G.2020-03-30T21:07:44Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/168269Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2020-03-30T21:07:44Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
title |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
spellingShingle |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) Tedesco, Ricardo P. Preterm Birth Prematurity Maternal Infection Neonatal Health Tedesco, Ricardo P. Preterm Birth Prematurity Maternal Infection Neonatal Health |
title_short |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
title_full |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
title_fullStr |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
title_sort |
The role of maternal infection in preterm birth: evidence from the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP) |
author |
Tedesco, Ricardo P. |
author_facet |
Tedesco, Ricardo P. Tedesco, Ricardo P. Galvão, Rafael B. Guida, Jose Paulo Passini-Júnior, Renato Lajos, Giuliane J. Nomura, Marcelo L. Rehder, Patricia M. Dias, Tabata Z. Souza, Renato T. Cecatti, Jose G. Galvão, Rafael B. Guida, Jose Paulo Passini-Júnior, Renato Lajos, Giuliane J. Nomura, Marcelo L. Rehder, Patricia M. Dias, Tabata Z. Souza, Renato T. Cecatti, Jose G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galvão, Rafael B. Guida, Jose Paulo Passini-Júnior, Renato Lajos, Giuliane J. Nomura, Marcelo L. Rehder, Patricia M. Dias, Tabata Z. Souza, Renato T. Cecatti, Jose G. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tedesco, Ricardo P. Galvão, Rafael B. Guida, Jose Paulo Passini-Júnior, Renato Lajos, Giuliane J. Nomura, Marcelo L. Rehder, Patricia M. Dias, Tabata Z. Souza, Renato T. Cecatti, Jose G. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Preterm Birth Prematurity Maternal Infection Neonatal Health |
topic |
Preterm Birth Prematurity Maternal Infection Neonatal Health |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Evidence suggests that infection or inflammation is a major contributor to early spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the development and causes of maternal infection associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with sPTB. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study with a nested case–control component, the Brazilian Multicentre Study on Preterm Birth (EMIP), conducted from April 2011 to July 2012 in 20 Brazilian referral obstetric hospitals. Women with preterm birth (PTB) and their neonates were enrolled. In this analysis, 2,682 women undergoing spontaneous preterm labor and premature pre-labor rupture of membranes were included. Two groups were identified based on self-reports or prenatal or hospital records: women with at least one infection factor and women without any maternal infection (vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection, or dental infection). A bivariate analysis was performed to identify potential individual risk factors for PTB. The odds ratios (ORs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The majority of women with sPTB fulfilled at least one criterion for the identification of maternal infection (65.9%), and more than half reported having urinary tract infection during pregnancy. Approximately 9.6% of women with PTB and maternal infection were classified as having periodontal infection only. Apart from the presence of a partner, which was more common among women with infectious diseases (p=0.026; OR, 1.28 [1.03–1.59]), other variables did not show any significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Maternal infection was highly prevalent in all cases of sPTBs, although it was not clearly associated with the type of PTB, gestational age, or any adverse neonatal outcomes. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1508 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1508 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269/160059 https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/168269/160060 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1508 Clinics; v. 75 (2020); e1508 Clinics; Vol. 75 (2020); e1508 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1822179003963801600 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1508 |