Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mei, ShuYa
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Jin, ShuQing, Chen, ZhiXia, Ding, XiBing, Zhao, Xiang, Li, Quan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/103942
Resumo: Patients frequently experience postoperative pain after a total knee arthroplasty; such pain is always challenging to treat and may delay the patient’s recovery. It is unclear whether local infiltration or a femoral nerve block offers a better analgesic effect after total knee arthroplasty.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare local infiltration with a femoral nerve block in patients who underwent a primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through December 2014. Two reviewers scanned abstracts and extracted data. The data collected included numeric rating scale values for pain at rest and pain upon movement and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each end point. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity.While the numeric rating scale values for pain upon movement (MD-0.62; 95%CI: -1.13 to -0.12; p=0.02) in the first 24 hours differed significantly between the patients who received local infiltration and those who received a femoral nerve block, there were no differences in the numeric rating scale results for pain at rest (MD-0.42; 95%CI:-1.32 to 0.47; p=0.35) or opioid consumption (MD 2.92; 95%CI:-1.32 to 7.16; p=0.18) in the first 24 hours.Local infiltration and femoral nerve block showed no significant differences in pain intensity at rest or opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty, but the femoral nerve block was associated with reduced pain upon movement.
id USP-19_ce301408b35ecf6393a48f31df9369e2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/103942
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block Patients frequently experience postoperative pain after a total knee arthroplasty; such pain is always challenging to treat and may delay the patient’s recovery. It is unclear whether local infiltration or a femoral nerve block offers a better analgesic effect after total knee arthroplasty.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare local infiltration with a femoral nerve block in patients who underwent a primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through December 2014. Two reviewers scanned abstracts and extracted data. The data collected included numeric rating scale values for pain at rest and pain upon movement and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each end point. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity.While the numeric rating scale values for pain upon movement (MD-0.62; 95%CI: -1.13 to -0.12; p=0.02) in the first 24 hours differed significantly between the patients who received local infiltration and those who received a femoral nerve block, there were no differences in the numeric rating scale results for pain at rest (MD-0.42; 95%CI:-1.32 to 0.47; p=0.35) or opioid consumption (MD 2.92; 95%CI:-1.32 to 7.16; p=0.18) in the first 24 hours.Local infiltration and femoral nerve block showed no significant differences in pain intensity at rest or opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty, but the femoral nerve block was associated with reduced pain upon movement. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10394210.6061/clinics/2015(09)09Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 9 (2015); 648-653Clinics; v. 70 n. 9 (2015); 648-653Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 9 (2015); 648-6531980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/103942/102485Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMei, ShuYaJin, ShuQingChen, ZhiXiaDing, XiBingZhao, XiangLi, Quan2015-09-15T20:12:20Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/103942Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-09-15T20:12:20Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
title Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
spellingShingle Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
Mei, ShuYa
title_short Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
title_full Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
title_fullStr Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
title_full_unstemmed Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
title_sort Analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing local infiltration and femoral nerve block
author Mei, ShuYa
author_facet Mei, ShuYa
Jin, ShuQing
Chen, ZhiXia
Ding, XiBing
Zhao, Xiang
Li, Quan
author_role author
author2 Jin, ShuQing
Chen, ZhiXia
Ding, XiBing
Zhao, Xiang
Li, Quan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mei, ShuYa
Jin, ShuQing
Chen, ZhiXia
Ding, XiBing
Zhao, Xiang
Li, Quan
description Patients frequently experience postoperative pain after a total knee arthroplasty; such pain is always challenging to treat and may delay the patient’s recovery. It is unclear whether local infiltration or a femoral nerve block offers a better analgesic effect after total knee arthroplasty.We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare local infiltration with a femoral nerve block in patients who underwent a primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through December 2014. Two reviewers scanned abstracts and extracted data. The data collected included numeric rating scale values for pain at rest and pain upon movement and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each end point. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity.While the numeric rating scale values for pain upon movement (MD-0.62; 95%CI: -1.13 to -0.12; p=0.02) in the first 24 hours differed significantly between the patients who received local infiltration and those who received a femoral nerve block, there were no differences in the numeric rating scale results for pain at rest (MD-0.42; 95%CI:-1.32 to 0.47; p=0.35) or opioid consumption (MD 2.92; 95%CI:-1.32 to 7.16; p=0.18) in the first 24 hours.Local infiltration and femoral nerve block showed no significant differences in pain intensity at rest or opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty, but the femoral nerve block was associated with reduced pain upon movement.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/103942
10.6061/clinics/2015(09)09
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/103942
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/103942/102485
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 9 (2015); 648-653
Clinics; v. 70 n. 9 (2015); 648-653
Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 9 (2015); 648-653
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222762224058368