Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guilger, Nádia Ricci
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Jorge, José Marcio Neves, Costa, Renato Prado, Salla, Fernando Cesar, Teixeira, Magaly Gemio, Nahas, Sergio Carlos, Cecconello, Ivan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19321
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Perineal prostatectomy has been proposed as a less invasive and safe procedure, but the risk of anal incontinence has been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perineal access on anal continence mechanisms after perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: From August 2008 to May 2009, twenty three patients underwent perineal prostatectomy. These patients were evaluated before surgery and eight months postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 65 (range, 54-72) years, and the mean prostate weight was 34.5 (range, 24-54) grams. Gleason scores ranged from 6-7, and the mean Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score (mean±;standard deviation) values were 0.9±1.9 and 0.7±1.2 (p.0.05) before and after surgery, respectively. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score did not change significantly after surgery. The mean values for anal manometric parameters before and after surgery were, respectively: Resting Pressures of 64±23 mmHg and 65±17 mmHg (p = 0.763), Maximum Squeezing Pressures of 130±41 mmHg and 117±40 mmHg (p = 0.259), High Pressure Zones of 3.0±0.9 cm and 2.7±0.8 cm(p = 0.398), Rectal Sensory Thresholds of 76±25 mland71±35 ml (p = 0.539), Maximum Tolerated Rectal Volumes of 157±48 ml and 156±56ml (p = 0.836), and Sphincter Asymmetry Indexes 22.4±9% and 14.4±5% (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the sphincter symmetry index after perineal prostatectomy. With the exception of the sphincter asymmetry index, perineal prostatectomy did not affect anal continence parameters.
id USP-19_cf8df0b4d1b46bcb8c3b7f7827bf5223
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19321
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence Anal incontinenceAnorectal manometryPerineal prostatectomyProstate cancer OBJECTIVE: Perineal prostatectomy has been proposed as a less invasive and safe procedure, but the risk of anal incontinence has been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perineal access on anal continence mechanisms after perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: From August 2008 to May 2009, twenty three patients underwent perineal prostatectomy. These patients were evaluated before surgery and eight months postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 65 (range, 54-72) years, and the mean prostate weight was 34.5 (range, 24-54) grams. Gleason scores ranged from 6-7, and the mean Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score (mean±;standard deviation) values were 0.9±1.9 and 0.7±1.2 (p.0.05) before and after surgery, respectively. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score did not change significantly after surgery. The mean values for anal manometric parameters before and after surgery were, respectively: Resting Pressures of 64±23 mmHg and 65±17 mmHg (p = 0.763), Maximum Squeezing Pressures of 130±41 mmHg and 117±40 mmHg (p = 0.259), High Pressure Zones of 3.0±0.9 cm and 2.7±0.8 cm(p = 0.398), Rectal Sensory Thresholds of 76±25 mland71±35 ml (p = 0.539), Maximum Tolerated Rectal Volumes of 157±48 ml and 156±56ml (p = 0.836), and Sphincter Asymmetry Indexes 22.4±9% and 14.4±5% (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the sphincter symmetry index after perineal prostatectomy. With the exception of the sphincter asymmetry index, perineal prostatectomy did not affect anal continence parameters. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1932110.1590/S1807-59322011001200002Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 12 (2011); 2007-2012 Clinics; v. 66 n. 12 (2011); 2007-2012 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 12 (2011); 2007-2012 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19321/21384Guilger, Nádia RicciJorge, José Marcio NevesCosta, Renato PradoSalla, Fernando CesarTeixeira, Magaly GemioNahas, Sergio CarlosCecconello, Ivaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:33:56Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19321Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:33:56Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
title Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
spellingShingle Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
Guilger, Nádia Ricci
Anal incontinence
Anorectal manometry
Perineal prostatectomy
Prostate cancer
title_short Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
title_full Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
title_fullStr Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
title_full_unstemmed Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
title_sort Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence
author Guilger, Nádia Ricci
author_facet Guilger, Nádia Ricci
Jorge, José Marcio Neves
Costa, Renato Prado
Salla, Fernando Cesar
Teixeira, Magaly Gemio
Nahas, Sergio Carlos
Cecconello, Ivan
author_role author
author2 Jorge, José Marcio Neves
Costa, Renato Prado
Salla, Fernando Cesar
Teixeira, Magaly Gemio
Nahas, Sergio Carlos
Cecconello, Ivan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guilger, Nádia Ricci
Jorge, José Marcio Neves
Costa, Renato Prado
Salla, Fernando Cesar
Teixeira, Magaly Gemio
Nahas, Sergio Carlos
Cecconello, Ivan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anal incontinence
Anorectal manometry
Perineal prostatectomy
Prostate cancer
topic Anal incontinence
Anorectal manometry
Perineal prostatectomy
Prostate cancer
description OBJECTIVE: Perineal prostatectomy has been proposed as a less invasive and safe procedure, but the risk of anal incontinence has been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of perineal access on anal continence mechanisms after perineal prostatectomy. METHODS: From August 2008 to May 2009, twenty three patients underwent perineal prostatectomy. These patients were evaluated before surgery and eight months postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 65 (range, 54-72) years, and the mean prostate weight was 34.5 (range, 24-54) grams. Gleason scores ranged from 6-7, and the mean Cleveland Clinic Anal Incontinence Score (mean±;standard deviation) values were 0.9±1.9 and 0.7±1.2 (p.0.05) before and after surgery, respectively. The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score did not change significantly after surgery. The mean values for anal manometric parameters before and after surgery were, respectively: Resting Pressures of 64±23 mmHg and 65±17 mmHg (p = 0.763), Maximum Squeezing Pressures of 130±41 mmHg and 117±40 mmHg (p = 0.259), High Pressure Zones of 3.0±0.9 cm and 2.7±0.8 cm(p = 0.398), Rectal Sensory Thresholds of 76±25 mland71±35 ml (p = 0.539), Maximum Tolerated Rectal Volumes of 157±48 ml and 156±56ml (p = 0.836), and Sphincter Asymmetry Indexes 22.4±9% and 14.4±5% (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the sphincter symmetry index after perineal prostatectomy. With the exception of the sphincter asymmetry index, perineal prostatectomy did not affect anal continence parameters.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19321
10.1590/S1807-59322011001200002
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19321
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322011001200002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19321/21384
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 12 (2011); 2007-2012
Clinics; v. 66 n. 12 (2011); 2007-2012
Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 12 (2011); 2007-2012
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222756763074560