Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carrara, Guilherme Freire Angotti
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Scapulatempo-Neto, Cristovam, Abrahão-Machado, Lucas Faria, Brentani, Maria Mitzi, Nunes, João Soares, Folgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike, Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130842
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed in patients with locally advanced breast cancer submitted to breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on an adriamycin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. We evaluated the clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemistry, and surgical factors that contribute to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox model were used to evaluate the main factors related to disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 449 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 98 underwent breast-conserving surgery. The average diameter of the tumors was 5.3 cm, and 87.2% reached a size of up to 3 cm. Moreover, 86.7% were classified as clinical stage III, 74.5% had T3-T4 tumors, 80.5% had N1-N2 axilla, and 89.8% had invasive ductal carcinoma. A pathologic complete response was observed in 27.6% of the tumors, and 100.0% of samples had free margins. The 5-year actuarial overall survival rate was 81.2%, and the mean follow-up was 72.8 months. The rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence were 11.2% and 15.3%, respectively. Multifocal morphology response was the only factor related to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the pathologic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-breast cutoff was the only factor related to locoregional recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving surgery is a safe and effective therapy for selected locally advanced breast tumors.
id USP-19_ddf84f2ad45e003a92fa0fe0e1306bc8
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/130842
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-upBreast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyDrug Therapy CombinationBreast-Conserving SurgeryRecurrenceDisease-Free SurvivalOBJECTIVE: To evaluate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed in patients with locally advanced breast cancer submitted to breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on an adriamycin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. We evaluated the clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemistry, and surgical factors that contribute to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox model were used to evaluate the main factors related to disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 449 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 98 underwent breast-conserving surgery. The average diameter of the tumors was 5.3 cm, and 87.2% reached a size of up to 3 cm. Moreover, 86.7% were classified as clinical stage III, 74.5% had T3-T4 tumors, 80.5% had N1-N2 axilla, and 89.8% had invasive ductal carcinoma. A pathologic complete response was observed in 27.6% of the tumors, and 100.0% of samples had free margins. The 5-year actuarial overall survival rate was 81.2%, and the mean follow-up was 72.8 months. The rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence were 11.2% and 15.3%, respectively. Multifocal morphology response was the only factor related to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the pathologic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-breast cutoff was the only factor related to locoregional recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving surgery is a safe and effective therapy for selected locally advanced breast tumors.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/13084210.6061/clinics/2017(03)02Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 3 (2017); 134-142Clinics; v. 72 n. 3 (2017); 134-142Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 3 (2017); 134-1421980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130842/127281Copyright (c) 2017 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarrara, Guilherme Freire AngottiScapulatempo-Neto, CristovamAbrahão-Machado, Lucas FariaBrentani, Maria MitziNunes, João SoaresFolgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo KoikeVieira, René Aloisio da Costa2017-04-10T16:00:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/130842Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2017-04-10T16:00:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
title Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
spellingShingle Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
Carrara, Guilherme Freire Angotti
Breast Neoplasms
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Drug Therapy Combination
Breast-Conserving Surgery
Recurrence
Disease-Free Survival
title_short Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
title_full Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
title_sort Breast-conserving surgery in locally advanced breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety and effectiveness based on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and long-term follow-up
author Carrara, Guilherme Freire Angotti
author_facet Carrara, Guilherme Freire Angotti
Scapulatempo-Neto, Cristovam
Abrahão-Machado, Lucas Faria
Brentani, Maria Mitzi
Nunes, João Soares
Folgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike
Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa
author_role author
author2 Scapulatempo-Neto, Cristovam
Abrahão-Machado, Lucas Faria
Brentani, Maria Mitzi
Nunes, João Soares
Folgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike
Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carrara, Guilherme Freire Angotti
Scapulatempo-Neto, Cristovam
Abrahão-Machado, Lucas Faria
Brentani, Maria Mitzi
Nunes, João Soares
Folgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike
Vieira, René Aloisio da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast Neoplasms
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Drug Therapy Combination
Breast-Conserving Surgery
Recurrence
Disease-Free Survival
topic Breast Neoplasms
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Drug Therapy Combination
Breast-Conserving Surgery
Recurrence
Disease-Free Survival
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed in patients with locally advanced breast cancer submitted to breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on an adriamycin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen. We evaluated the clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemistry, and surgical factors that contribute to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox model were used to evaluate the main factors related to disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 449 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 98 underwent breast-conserving surgery. The average diameter of the tumors was 5.3 cm, and 87.2% reached a size of up to 3 cm. Moreover, 86.7% were classified as clinical stage III, 74.5% had T3-T4 tumors, 80.5% had N1-N2 axilla, and 89.8% had invasive ductal carcinoma. A pathologic complete response was observed in 27.6% of the tumors, and 100.0% of samples had free margins. The 5-year actuarial overall survival rate was 81.2%, and the mean follow-up was 72.8 months. The rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrence were 11.2% and 15.3%, respectively. Multifocal morphology response was the only factor related to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the pathologic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-breast cutoff was the only factor related to locoregional recurrence disease-free survival (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving surgery is a safe and effective therapy for selected locally advanced breast tumors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130842
10.6061/clinics/2017(03)02
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130842
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2017(03)02
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/130842/127281
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 72 No. 3 (2017); 134-142
Clinics; v. 72 n. 3 (2017); 134-142
Clinics; Vol. 72 Núm. 3 (2017); 134-142
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222763130028032