Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating. |
id |
USP-19_e6d5ff985adba296f766fe97510c20d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/100962 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10096210.6061/clinics/2015(03)11Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 3 (2015); 214-219Clinics; v. 70 n. 3 (2015); 214-219Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 3 (2015); 214-2191980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962/99626Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCai, Song-Wang Shen, Ning Li, Dong-Xia Wei, Bo An, Jun Zhang, Jun-Hang 2015-07-28T13:01:13Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/100962Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-07-28T13:01:13Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cai, Song-Wang |
title_short |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Cai, Song-Wang |
author_facet |
Cai, Song-Wang Shen, Ning Li, Dong-Xia Wei, Bo An, Jun Zhang, Jun-Hang |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Shen, Ning Li, Dong-Xia Wei, Bo An, Jun Zhang, Jun-Hang |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cai, Song-Wang Shen, Ning Li, Dong-Xia Wei, Bo An, Jun Zhang, Jun-Hang |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962 10.6061/clinics/2015(03)11 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2015(03)11 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962/99626 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 3 (2015); 214-219 Clinics; v. 70 n. 3 (2015); 214-219 Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 3 (2015); 214-219 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222761733324800 |