Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cai, Song-Wang
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Shen, Ning, Li, Dong-Xia, Wei, Bo, An, Jun, Zhang, Jun-Hang
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating.
id USP-19_e6d5ff985adba296f766fe97510c20d9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/100962
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/10096210.6061/clinics/2015(03)11Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 3 (2015); 214-219Clinics; v. 70 n. 3 (2015); 214-219Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 3 (2015); 214-2191980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962/99626Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCai, Song-Wang Shen, Ning Li, Dong-Xia Wei, Bo An, Jun Zhang, Jun-Hang 2015-07-28T13:01:13Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/100962Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-07-28T13:01:13Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Cai, Song-Wang
title_short Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Compensatory sweating after restricting or lowering the level of sympathectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Cai, Song-Wang
author_facet Cai, Song-Wang
Shen, Ning
Li, Dong-Xia
Wei, Bo
An, Jun
Zhang, Jun-Hang
author_role author
author2 Shen, Ning
Li, Dong-Xia
Wei, Bo
An, Jun
Zhang, Jun-Hang
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cai, Song-Wang
Shen, Ning
Li, Dong-Xia
Wei, Bo
An, Jun
Zhang, Jun-Hang
description OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962
10.6061/clinics/2015(03)11
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2015(03)11
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/100962/99626
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 3 (2015); 214-219
Clinics; v. 70 n. 3 (2015); 214-219
Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 3 (2015); 214-219
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761733324800