Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gabriel Costa e
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Simão, Roberto, Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da, Costa, Pablo B., Miranda, Humberto, Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da, Almeida, Roberto L., Sato, Mônica Akemi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT.
id USP-19_ede7d3c31fe6cebfb2b60e153433048e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/162057
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?Static StretchingResistance TrainingAutonomic Nervous SystemHeartBlood OcclusionOBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/16205710.6061/clinics/2019/e1066Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e1066Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e10661980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155950https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155951Silva, Gabriel Costa eSimão, RobertoConceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues daCosta, Pablo B.Miranda, HumbertoConceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues daAlmeida, Roberto L.Sato, Mônica Akemiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-09T14:53:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/162057Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-09-09T14:53:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
title Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
spellingShingle Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
Silva, Gabriel Costa e
Static Stretching
Resistance Training
Autonomic Nervous System
Heart
Blood Occlusion
title_short Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
title_full Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
title_fullStr Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
title_full_unstemmed Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
title_sort Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
author Silva, Gabriel Costa e
author_facet Silva, Gabriel Costa e
Simão, Roberto
Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da
Costa, Pablo B.
Miranda, Humberto
Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da
Almeida, Roberto L.
Sato, Mônica Akemi
author_role author
author2 Simão, Roberto
Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da
Costa, Pablo B.
Miranda, Humberto
Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da
Almeida, Roberto L.
Sato, Mônica Akemi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gabriel Costa e
Simão, Roberto
Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da
Costa, Pablo B.
Miranda, Humberto
Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da
Almeida, Roberto L.
Sato, Mônica Akemi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Static Stretching
Resistance Training
Autonomic Nervous System
Heart
Blood Occlusion
topic Static Stretching
Resistance Training
Autonomic Nervous System
Heart
Blood Occlusion
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057
10.6061/clinics/2019/e1066
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1066
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155950
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155951
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e1066
Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066
Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1787713181398859776