Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT. |
id |
USP-19_ede7d3c31fe6cebfb2b60e153433048e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/162057 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload?Static StretchingResistance TrainingAutonomic Nervous SystemHeartBlood OcclusionOBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2019-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/16205710.6061/clinics/2019/e1066Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e1066Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e10661980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155950https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155951Silva, Gabriel Costa eSimão, RobertoConceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues daCosta, Pablo B.Miranda, HumbertoConceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues daAlmeida, Roberto L.Sato, Mônica Akemiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-09-09T14:53:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/162057Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2019-09-09T14:53:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
title |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
spellingShingle |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? Silva, Gabriel Costa e Static Stretching Resistance Training Autonomic Nervous System Heart Blood Occlusion |
title_short |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
title_full |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
title_fullStr |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
title_sort |
Does the combination of resistance training and stretching increase cardiac overload? |
author |
Silva, Gabriel Costa e |
author_facet |
Silva, Gabriel Costa e Simão, Roberto Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Costa, Pablo B. Miranda, Humberto Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da Almeida, Roberto L. Sato, Mônica Akemi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Simão, Roberto Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Costa, Pablo B. Miranda, Humberto Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da Almeida, Roberto L. Sato, Mônica Akemi |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Gabriel Costa e Simão, Roberto Conceicão, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Costa, Pablo B. Miranda, Humberto Conceição, Rodolfo Rodrigues da Almeida, Roberto L. Sato, Mônica Akemi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Static Stretching Resistance Training Autonomic Nervous System Heart Blood Occlusion |
topic |
Static Stretching Resistance Training Autonomic Nervous System Heart Blood Occlusion |
description |
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on heart rate (HR), systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), rating of perceived effort (RPE), and heart rate variability (HRV) in men. METHODS: Twelve normotensive healthy men participated in four protocols: a) SS+RT, b) RT+SS, c) RT, and d) SS. Variables were measured before, immediately after, and 15, 30, and 45 min after the sessions. RESULTS: The combination of SS and RT increased (po0.001) HR when compared to the effects of the noncombined protocols (from 2.38 to 11.02%), and this result indicated metabolic compensation. Regarding DBP, there were differences (po0.001) between the RT and SS groups (53.93±8.59 vs. 67.00±7.01 mmHg). SS has been shown to be able to reduce (po0.001) SpO2 (4.67%) due to the occlusion caused by a reduction in the caliber of the blood vessels during SS compared to during rest. The increase in RPP (6.88% between RT and SS+RT) along with the HR results indicated higher metabolic stress than that reflected by the RPE (combined protocols increased RPE from 21.63 to 43.25%). The HRV analysis confirmed these results, showing increases (po0.01) in the LF index between the combined and noncombined protocols. Compared to the effect of RT, the combination of SS and RT promoted a vagal suppression root mean square of the successive differences (RMSSD) index (from 9.51 to 21.52%) between the RT and SS+RT groups (po0.01) and between the RT and RT+SS groups (po0.001). CONCLUSION: Static stretching increases cardiac overload and RPE, reducing oxygen supply, especially when performed in combination with RT. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1066 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.6061/clinics/2019/e1066 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155950 https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/162057/155951 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066 Clinics; v. 74 (2019); e1066 Clinics; Vol. 74 (2019); e1066 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222764571820032 |