Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles. |
id |
USP-19_eebdccec6d9d4728b95c96c8c062f4a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19264 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study Musculature StrengthNulliparousPelvic Floor MusclePrimiparous OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1926410.1590/S1807-59322011000800014Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; v. 66 n. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264/21327Gameiro, Mônica OrsiSousa, Vanessa OliveiraGameiro, Luiz FelipeMuchailh, Rosana CarneiroPadovani, Carlos RobertoAmaro, João Luizinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:30:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19264Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:30:57Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
title |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study Gameiro, Mônica Orsi Musculature Strength Nulliparous Pelvic Floor Muscle Primiparous |
title_short |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
title_full |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
title_sort |
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study |
author |
Gameiro, Mônica Orsi |
author_facet |
Gameiro, Mônica Orsi Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira Gameiro, Luiz Felipe Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro Padovani, Carlos Roberto Amaro, João Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira Gameiro, Luiz Felipe Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro Padovani, Carlos Roberto Amaro, João Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gameiro, Mônica Orsi Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira Gameiro, Luiz Felipe Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro Padovani, Carlos Roberto Amaro, João Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Musculature Strength Nulliparous Pelvic Floor Muscle Primiparous |
topic |
Musculature Strength Nulliparous Pelvic Floor Muscle Primiparous |
description |
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264 10.1590/S1807-59322011000800014 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322011000800014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264/21327 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; v. 66 n. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222756327915520 |