Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gameiro, Mônica Orsi
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira, Gameiro, Luiz Felipe, Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro, Padovani, Carlos Roberto, Amaro, João Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles.
id USP-19_eebdccec6d9d4728b95c96c8c062f4a3
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/19264
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study Musculature StrengthNulliparousPelvic Floor MusclePrimiparous OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1926410.1590/S1807-59322011000800014Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; v. 66 n. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 8 (2011); 1389-1394 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264/21327Gameiro, Mônica OrsiSousa, Vanessa OliveiraGameiro, Luiz FelipeMuchailh, Rosana CarneiroPadovani, Carlos RobertoAmaro, João Luizinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T16:30:57Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/19264Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T16:30:57Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
title Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
spellingShingle Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
Gameiro, Mônica Orsi
Musculature Strength
Nulliparous
Pelvic Floor Muscle
Primiparous
title_short Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
title_full Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
title_sort Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength evaluations in nulliparous and primiparous women: a prospective study
author Gameiro, Mônica Orsi
author_facet Gameiro, Mônica Orsi
Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira
Gameiro, Luiz Felipe
Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro
Padovani, Carlos Roberto
Amaro, João Luiz
author_role author
author2 Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira
Gameiro, Luiz Felipe
Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro
Padovani, Carlos Roberto
Amaro, João Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gameiro, Mônica Orsi
Sousa, Vanessa Oliveira
Gameiro, Luiz Felipe
Muchailh, Rosana Carneiro
Padovani, Carlos Roberto
Amaro, João Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Musculature Strength
Nulliparous
Pelvic Floor Muscle
Primiparous
topic Musculature Strength
Nulliparous
Pelvic Floor Muscle
Primiparous
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the pelvic floor muscle strength of nulliparous and primiparous women. METHODS: A total of 100 women were prospectively distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) (n = 50) included healthy nulliparous women, and Group 2 (G2) (n = 50) included healthy primiparous women. Pelvic floor muscle strength was subjectively evaluated using transvaginal digital palpation. Pelvic floor muscle strength was objectively assessed using a portable perineometer. All of the parameters were evaluated simultaneously in G1 and were evaluated in G2 during the 20th and 36th weeks of pregnancy and 45 days after delivery. RESULTS: In G2, 14 women were excluded because they left the study before the follow-up evaluation. The median age was 23 years in G1 and 22 years in G2; there was no significant difference between the groups. The average body mass index was 21.7 kg/m² in G1 and 25.0 kg/m² in G2; there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0004). In G2, transvaginal digital palpation evaluation showed significant impairments of pelvic floor muscle strength at the 36th week of pregnancy (p = 0.0006) and 45 days after vaginal delivery (p = 0.0001) compared to G1. Objective evaluations of pelvic floor muscle strength in G2 revealed a significant decrease 45 days after vaginal delivery compared to nulliparous patients. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy and vaginal delivery may cause weakness of the pelvic floor muscles.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264
10.1590/S1807-59322011000800014
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322011000800014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19264/21327
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 66 No. 8 (2011); 1389-1394
Clinics; v. 66 n. 8 (2011); 1389-1394
Clinics; Vol. 66 Núm. 8 (2011); 1389-1394
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222756327915520