Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hou, Tianyong
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Zhou, Qiang, Dai, Fei, Luo, Fei, He, Qingyi, Zhang, Jinsong, Xu, Jianzhong
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96954
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To explore the microendoscopic discectomy technique and inclusion criteria for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to supply feasible criteria and technical notes to avoid complications and to increase the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent posterior microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no severe pain in the lumbar region, no lumbar instability observed by flexion-extension radiography and no intervertebral discitis or endplate damage observed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations. RESULTS: Follow-up visits were carried out in all cases. Complications, such as nerve injuries, were not observed. The follow-up outcomes were graded using the MacNab criteria. A grade of excellent was given to 12 patients, good to 12 patients and fair to 1 patient. A grade of excellent or good occurred in 96% of cases. One patient relapsed 3 months after surgery and then underwent lumbar interbody fusion and inner fixation. The numerical rating scale of preoperative leg pain was 7.4± 1.5, whereas it decreased to 2.1±0.8 at 7 days after surgery. The preoperative Oswestry disability index of lumbar function was 57.5±10.0, whereas it was 26.0±8.5 at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In these cases, microendoscopic discectomy was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, it has advantages over other methods because of its smaller incision, reduced bleeding and more efficient recovery.
id USP-19_f89c8fa09f9492aabb3e5ffa26c1f15d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/96954
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation OBJECTIVES: To explore the microendoscopic discectomy technique and inclusion criteria for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to supply feasible criteria and technical notes to avoid complications and to increase the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent posterior microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no severe pain in the lumbar region, no lumbar instability observed by flexion-extension radiography and no intervertebral discitis or endplate damage observed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations. RESULTS: Follow-up visits were carried out in all cases. Complications, such as nerve injuries, were not observed. The follow-up outcomes were graded using the MacNab criteria. A grade of excellent was given to 12 patients, good to 12 patients and fair to 1 patient. A grade of excellent or good occurred in 96% of cases. One patient relapsed 3 months after surgery and then underwent lumbar interbody fusion and inner fixation. The numerical rating scale of preoperative leg pain was 7.4± 1.5, whereas it decreased to 2.1±0.8 at 7 days after surgery. The preoperative Oswestry disability index of lumbar function was 57.5±10.0, whereas it was 26.0±8.5 at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In these cases, microendoscopic discectomy was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, it has advantages over other methods because of its smaller incision, reduced bleeding and more efficient recovery. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/9695410.6061/clinics/2015(02)09Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2015); 120-125Clinics; v. 70 n. 2 (2015); 120-125Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2015); 120-1251980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96954/96034Copyright (c) 2015 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHou, Tianyong Zhou, Qiang Dai, Fei Luo, Fei He, Qingyi Zhang, Jinsong Xu, Jianzhong 2015-03-30T10:50:25Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/96954Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2015-03-30T10:50:25Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
title Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
spellingShingle Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
Hou, Tianyong
title_short Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
title_full Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
title_fullStr Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
title_full_unstemmed Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
title_sort Repeated microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disk herniation
author Hou, Tianyong
author_facet Hou, Tianyong
Zhou, Qiang
Dai, Fei
Luo, Fei
He, Qingyi
Zhang, Jinsong
Xu, Jianzhong
author_role author
author2 Zhou, Qiang
Dai, Fei
Luo, Fei
He, Qingyi
Zhang, Jinsong
Xu, Jianzhong
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hou, Tianyong
Zhou, Qiang
Dai, Fei
Luo, Fei
He, Qingyi
Zhang, Jinsong
Xu, Jianzhong
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the microendoscopic discectomy technique and inclusion criteria for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and to supply feasible criteria and technical notes to avoid complications and to increase the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A consecutive series of 25 patients who underwent posterior microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no severe pain in the lumbar region, no lumbar instability observed by flexion-extension radiography and no intervertebral discitis or endplate damage observed by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestations and imaging examinations. RESULTS: Follow-up visits were carried out in all cases. Complications, such as nerve injuries, were not observed. The follow-up outcomes were graded using the MacNab criteria. A grade of excellent was given to 12 patients, good to 12 patients and fair to 1 patient. A grade of excellent or good occurred in 96% of cases. One patient relapsed 3 months after surgery and then underwent lumbar interbody fusion and inner fixation. The numerical rating scale of preoperative leg pain was 7.4± 1.5, whereas it decreased to 2.1±0.8 at 7 days after surgery. The preoperative Oswestry disability index of lumbar function was 57.5±10.0, whereas it was 26.0±8.5 at 7 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: In these cases, microendoscopic discectomy was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results. Furthermore, it has advantages over other methods because of its smaller incision, reduced bleeding and more efficient recovery.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96954
10.6061/clinics/2015(02)09
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96954
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2015(02)09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/96954/96034
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 70 No. 2 (2015); 120-125
Clinics; v. 70 n. 2 (2015); 120-125
Clinics; Vol. 70 Núm. 2 (2015); 120-125
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222761707110400