Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosito, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Galia, Carlos Roberto, Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza, Moreira, Luis Fernando, Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C., Palma, Humberto Moreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781
Resumo: BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty.
id USP-19_fae00630452f952fdae37563025279f7
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17781
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device Total Hip ArthroplastyRevisionBone graftsFreeze-driedXenograftsBovine BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1778110.1590/S1807-59322008000400016Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; v. 63 n. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 4 (2008); 509-514 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781/19846Rosito, RicardoGalia, Carlos RobertoMacedo, Carlos Alberto SouzaMoreira, Luis FernandoQuaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C.Palma, Humberto Moreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:32:32Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17781Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:32:32Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
title Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
spellingShingle Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
Rosito, Ricardo
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Revision
Bone grafts
Freeze-dried
Xenografts
Bovine
title_short Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
title_full Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
title_fullStr Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
title_full_unstemmed Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
title_sort Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
author Rosito, Ricardo
author_facet Rosito, Ricardo
Galia, Carlos Roberto
Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza
Moreira, Luis Fernando
Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C.
Palma, Humberto Moreira
author_role author
author2 Galia, Carlos Roberto
Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza
Moreira, Luis Fernando
Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C.
Palma, Humberto Moreira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosito, Ricardo
Galia, Carlos Roberto
Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza
Moreira, Luis Fernando
Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C.
Palma, Humberto Moreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Total Hip Arthroplasty
Revision
Bone grafts
Freeze-dried
Xenografts
Bovine
topic Total Hip Arthroplasty
Revision
Bone grafts
Freeze-dried
Xenografts
Bovine
description BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781
10.1590/S1807-59322008000400016
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322008000400016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781/19846
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 4 (2008); 509-514
Clinics; v. 63 n. 4 (2008); 509-514
Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 4 (2008); 509-514
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222753525071872