Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinics |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. |
id |
USP-19_fae00630452f952fdae37563025279f7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17781 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
network_name_str |
Clinics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device Total Hip ArthroplastyRevisionBone graftsFreeze-driedXenograftsBovine BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1778110.1590/S1807-59322008000400016Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; v. 63 n. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 4 (2008); 509-514 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781/19846Rosito, RicardoGalia, Carlos RobertoMacedo, Carlos Alberto SouzaMoreira, Luis FernandoQuaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C.Palma, Humberto Moreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:32:32Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17781Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:32:32Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
title |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
spellingShingle |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device Rosito, Ricardo Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision Bone grafts Freeze-dried Xenografts Bovine |
title_short |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
title_full |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
title_fullStr |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
title_full_unstemmed |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
title_sort |
Acetabular reconstruction with human and bovine freeze-dried bone grafts and a reinforcement device |
author |
Rosito, Ricardo |
author_facet |
Rosito, Ricardo Galia, Carlos Roberto Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza Moreira, Luis Fernando Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C. Palma, Humberto Moreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Galia, Carlos Roberto Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza Moreira, Luis Fernando Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C. Palma, Humberto Moreira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosito, Ricardo Galia, Carlos Roberto Macedo, Carlos Alberto Souza Moreira, Luis Fernando Quaresma, Lourdes Maria Araújo C. Palma, Humberto Moreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision Bone grafts Freeze-dried Xenografts Bovine |
topic |
Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision Bone grafts Freeze-dried Xenografts Bovine |
description |
BACKGROUND: This is a cohort trial (1997-2005) of 49 patients submitted to an acetabular component revision of a total hip arthroplasty, using impacted human and bovine freeze-dried cancellous bone grafts (H&FDBG) and a reinforcement device. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical/radiographic graft incorporation capability between cancellous bone grafts. PATIENTS/METHODS: There were two groups: I (n=26) receiving human grafts and II (n=25) receiving bovine grafts. The average follow-up times were 55 and 49 months, respectively. Clinical analysis was based on the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, and the radiographic analysis involved an established score based on Conn's et al. criteria for radiographic bone incorporation. RESULTS: No clinical/radiographic differences were found between the groups and both showed an overall rate of 88.5% and 76% of graft incorporation (p=0.424). CONCLUSION: The results presented here are comparable to those in the literature with the use of deep-FG. Therefore, cancellous bone grafts can be safely and adequately used in acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781 10.1590/S1807-59322008000400016 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322008000400016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17781/19846 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 63 No. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; v. 63 n. 4 (2008); 509-514 Clinics; Vol. 63 Núm. 4 (2008); 509-514 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Clinics |
collection |
Clinics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
_version_ |
1800222753525071872 |