Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jales, Mario de Queiroz Monteiro
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Costa, Cinthia Cabral da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Economia Aplicada
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/88430
Resumo: The objectives of this study were to measure the subsidy equivalent value of ethanol policies in the United States and Brazil, and estimate the magnitude of associated economic distortions. For 2002-11, average annual ethanol subsidy levels were US$7.2 billion in the United States and US$2.1 billion in Brazil. Brazilian support measures for ethanol increased the world price by 2.7% on average in this period, which expanded out put in both countries (1.2% in the United States and 5.3% in Brazil), reduced U.S. consumption by 4.7% and increased Brazilian consumption by 16.1%. On the other hand, U.S. ethanol policies depressed world prices by 2.4% on average in the same period, which boosted consumption in both countries (by 2.5% in the United States and 1.3% in Brazil), expanded U.S. production by 8.3%, but reduced Brazilian out put by 4.7%. Although both countries changed their policies in 2012, distortions remain.
id USP-21_a7da1d02fb76c50d55442ab7271ea0ca
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/88430
network_acronym_str USP-21
network_name_str Economia Aplicada
repository_id_str
spelling Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policiesThe objectives of this study were to measure the subsidy equivalent value of ethanol policies in the United States and Brazil, and estimate the magnitude of associated economic distortions. For 2002-11, average annual ethanol subsidy levels were US$7.2 billion in the United States and US$2.1 billion in Brazil. Brazilian support measures for ethanol increased the world price by 2.7% on average in this period, which expanded out put in both countries (1.2% in the United States and 5.3% in Brazil), reduced U.S. consumption by 4.7% and increased Brazilian consumption by 16.1%. On the other hand, U.S. ethanol policies depressed world prices by 2.4% on average in the same period, which boosted consumption in both countries (by 2.5% in the United States and 1.3% in Brazil), expanded U.S. production by 8.3%, but reduced Brazilian out put by 4.7%. Although both countries changed their policies in 2012, distortions remain.Este estudo tem por objetivos medir os valores dos subsídios equivalentes das políticas de apoio ao etanol nos Estados Unidos e no Brasil e estimar a magnitude das distorções econômicas por eles causadas. Para o período entre 2002 e 2011, os valores anuais médios destes subsídios foram de US$7,2 bilhões nos Estados Unidos e US$2,1 bilhões no Brasil. As políticas brasileiras elevaram o preço mundial em média em 2,7% neste período, elevando a produção nos dois países (1,2% nos Estados Unidos e 5,3% no Brasil), reduzindo o consumo norte-americano em 4,7% e expandindo o consumo brasileiro em 16,1%. Já as políticas dos Estados Unidos deprimiram o preço mundial em média em 2,4% no mesmo período, expandindo o consumo nos dois países (2,5% no Estados Unidos e 1,3% no Brasil), aumentando a produção norte-americana em 8,3%, mas provocando uma queda de 4,7% na produção brasileira. Em 2012, ambos países mudaram suas políticas, mas as distorções no mercado permanecem.Universidade de São Paulo, FEA-RP/USP2014-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/8843010.1590/1413-8050/ea375Economia Aplicada; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2014); 455-481Economia Aplicada; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2014); 455-481Economia Aplicada; v. 18 n. 3 (2014); 455-4811980-53301413-8050reponame:Economia Aplicadainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/88430/91313Copyright (c) 2015 Economia Aplicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJales, Mario de Queiroz MonteiroCosta, Cinthia Cabral da2016-02-03T16:59:19Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/88430Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/oai||revecap@usp.br1980-53301413-8050opendoar:2023-09-13T12:17:02.554623Economia Aplicada - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
title Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
spellingShingle Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
Jales, Mario de Queiroz Monteiro
title_short Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
title_full Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
title_fullStr Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
title_sort Measurement of ethanol subsidies and associated economic distortions: an analysis of Brazilian and U.S. policies
author Jales, Mario de Queiroz Monteiro
author_facet Jales, Mario de Queiroz Monteiro
Costa, Cinthia Cabral da
author_role author
author2 Costa, Cinthia Cabral da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jales, Mario de Queiroz Monteiro
Costa, Cinthia Cabral da
description The objectives of this study were to measure the subsidy equivalent value of ethanol policies in the United States and Brazil, and estimate the magnitude of associated economic distortions. For 2002-11, average annual ethanol subsidy levels were US$7.2 billion in the United States and US$2.1 billion in Brazil. Brazilian support measures for ethanol increased the world price by 2.7% on average in this period, which expanded out put in both countries (1.2% in the United States and 5.3% in Brazil), reduced U.S. consumption by 4.7% and increased Brazilian consumption by 16.1%. On the other hand, U.S. ethanol policies depressed world prices by 2.4% on average in the same period, which boosted consumption in both countries (by 2.5% in the United States and 1.3% in Brazil), expanded U.S. production by 8.3%, but reduced Brazilian out put by 4.7%. Although both countries changed their policies in 2012, distortions remain.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/88430
10.1590/1413-8050/ea375
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/88430
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1413-8050/ea375
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ecoa/article/view/88430/91313
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Economia Aplicada
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Economia Aplicada
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, FEA-RP/USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo, FEA-RP/USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economia Aplicada; Vol. 18 No. 3 (2014); 455-481
Economia Aplicada; Vol. 18 Núm. 3 (2014); 455-481
Economia Aplicada; v. 18 n. 3 (2014); 455-481
1980-5330
1413-8050
reponame:Economia Aplicada
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Economia Aplicada
collection Economia Aplicada
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economia Aplicada - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revecap@usp.br
_version_ 1800221695073583104