The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perelson, Simone
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7255
Resumo: The paper examines the approach proposed by Freud between the ‘father of the primal horde' referred to in Totem and Taboo and the concept of ‘superman' described by Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Based on this analysis, the following points are discussed: (1) problems addressed in the Freudian interpretation of the concept of ‘Superman'; (2) differences between Freud and Nietzsche regarding the understanding of ‘authority' and ‘disregard for the Law', singular aspects, according to Freud, both of the ‘superman' as well as the ‘father of the horde' and (3) difference between ‘contempt for moral' claimed by Freud and Nietzsche's advocacy of a ‘morality based on the transmutation of all values'.
id USP-22_1f37f27c262c4fc4c9765e2a69764c20
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/7255
network_acronym_str USP-22
network_name_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations "El superhombre" y "el padre de la horda": consideraciones éticas O "super-homem" e o "pai da horda": considerações éticas fatherFreudmoralpaiFreudmoralpadreFreudmoral The paper examines the approach proposed by Freud between the ‘father of the primal horde' referred to in Totem and Taboo and the concept of ‘superman' described by Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Based on this analysis, the following points are discussed: (1) problems addressed in the Freudian interpretation of the concept of ‘Superman'; (2) differences between Freud and Nietzsche regarding the understanding of ‘authority' and ‘disregard for the Law', singular aspects, according to Freud, both of the ‘superman' as well as the ‘father of the horde' and (3) difference between ‘contempt for moral' claimed by Freud and Nietzsche's advocacy of a ‘morality based on the transmutation of all values'. El artículo analiza el acercamiento propuesto por Freud entre el "padre de la horda primitiva" al que se refiere en Totem y Tabu y el concepto de "superhombre" descripto por Nietzsche en Así habló Zaratustra. Serán tratados, a través de este análisis: (1) problemas presentes en la interpretación freudiana del concepto de "superhombre"; (2) diferencias entre Freud y Nietzsche en lo concerniente a la comprensión de la "autarquia" y de la "desconsideración de la ley", aspectos propios, según Freud, tanto del "superhombre" como del "padre de la horda", y (3) diferencia entre el "desprecio de la moral" reivindicado por Freud y la defensa nietzscheana de una "moral basada en la transmutación de todos los valores". O artigo analisa a aproximação proposta por Freud entre o "pai da horda primitiva," por ele referido em Totem e Tabu, e a noção de "super-homem" referida por Nietzsche em Assim falou Zaratustra. Por meio desta análise, serão abordados: (1) problemas presentes na interpretação freudiana da noção de "super-homem", (2) diferenças entre Freud e Nietzsche no que concerne à compreensão da "autarquia" e da "desconsideração pela lei", aspectos próprios, segundo Freud, tanto do "super-homem" quanto do "pai da horda" e (3) diferença entre o "desprezo pela moral" reivindicado por Freud e a defesa nietzschiana de uma "moral baseada na transmutação de todos os valores". Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/725510.1590/S0103-863X2010000300013Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 20 n. 47 (2010); 411-419 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 20 No. 47 (2010); 411-419 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2010); 411-419 1982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7255/8738Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPerelson, Simone2012-05-03T17:32:07Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/7255Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-05-03T17:32:07Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
"El superhombre" y "el padre de la horda": consideraciones éticas
O "super-homem" e o "pai da horda": considerações éticas
title The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
spellingShingle The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
Perelson, Simone
father
Freud
moral
pai
Freud
moral
padre
Freud
moral
title_short The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
title_full The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
title_fullStr The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
title_full_unstemmed The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
title_sort The "superman" and the "horde father": ethical considerations
author Perelson, Simone
author_facet Perelson, Simone
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perelson, Simone
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv father
Freud
moral
pai
Freud
moral
padre
Freud
moral
topic father
Freud
moral
pai
Freud
moral
padre
Freud
moral
description The paper examines the approach proposed by Freud between the ‘father of the primal horde' referred to in Totem and Taboo and the concept of ‘superman' described by Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Based on this analysis, the following points are discussed: (1) problems addressed in the Freudian interpretation of the concept of ‘Superman'; (2) differences between Freud and Nietzsche regarding the understanding of ‘authority' and ‘disregard for the Law', singular aspects, according to Freud, both of the ‘superman' as well as the ‘father of the horde' and (3) difference between ‘contempt for moral' claimed by Freud and Nietzsche's advocacy of a ‘morality based on the transmutation of all values'.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7255
10.1590/S0103-863X2010000300013
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7255
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-863X2010000300013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/7255/8738
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 20 n. 47 (2010); 411-419
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 20 No. 47 (2010); 411-419
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 20 Núm. 47 (2010); 411-419
1982-4327
0103-863X
reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
collection Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||paideia@usp.br
_version_ 1800221832391950336

Registros relacionados