Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
DOI: | 10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177 |
Resumo: | The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic). |
id |
USP-22_78f26d60f502d726ac1134e954ba83a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/6177 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-22 |
network_name_str |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
spelling |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Escalonamento do prestígio social por métodos psicofísicos diretos e indiretos Psicofísica sociallei de Stevensprestígio socialestimação de magnitudeSocial psychophysicsStevens Lawsocial prestigemagnitude estimates The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic). O prestígio profissional social sustentado por Assistentes Sociais, Biólogos, Dentistas, Enfermeiros, Engenheiros, Farmacêuticos, Físicos, Fisioterapeutas, Fonoaudiólogos, Médicos, Psicólogos, Químicos e Sociólogos foi escalonado pelos métodos psicofísicos de comparação aos pares (indireto) e estimação de magnitude (direto). Os resultados mostraram que: 1) ambos os métodos forneceram escalonamentos substancialmente diferentes; 2) a escala de comparações aos pares (proporção de z) é uma função logarítmica da escala de estimação de magnitude; 3) a escala de comparação aos pares (proporção de z) é uma função linear dos logaritmos da escala de estimação de magnitude; e 4) obteve-se uma alta correlação (rho = 0, 95) entre os graus de prestígio atribuídos às profissões nos dois métodos. Com estes resultados, podemos concluir que: 1) o contínuo do prestígio social (não-métrico) escalonado por estes dois métodos permite uma relação similar à obtida no contínuo sensorial (métrico); e 2) o contínuo do prestígio social possui as seguintes características: quantitativo, protético e não-quanlitativo (metatético). Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2004-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/617710.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 14 n. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 No. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 Núm. 27 (2004); 89-94 1982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177/7708Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaleiros-Sousa, FátimaSilva, José Aparecido Da2012-04-30T01:46:43Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/6177Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-04-30T01:46:43Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Escalonamento do prestígio social por métodos psicofísicos diretos e indiretos |
title |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
spellingShingle |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima Psicofísica social lei de Stevens prestígio social estimação de magnitude Social psychophysics Stevens Law social prestige magnitude estimates Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima Psicofísica social lei de Stevens prestígio social estimação de magnitude Social psychophysics Stevens Law social prestige magnitude estimates |
title_short |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
title_full |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
title_fullStr |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
title_sort |
Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods |
author |
Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima |
author_facet |
Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima Silva, José Aparecido Da Silva, José Aparecido Da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, José Aparecido Da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima Silva, José Aparecido Da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psicofísica social lei de Stevens prestígio social estimação de magnitude Social psychophysics Stevens Law social prestige magnitude estimates |
topic |
Psicofísica social lei de Stevens prestígio social estimação de magnitude Social psychophysics Stevens Law social prestige magnitude estimates |
description |
The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic). |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177 10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177/7708 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 14 n. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 No. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 Núm. 27 (2004); 89-94 1982-4327 0103-863X reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
collection |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||paideia@usp.br |
_version_ |
1822181723988819968 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012 |