Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Silva, José Aparecido Da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177
Resumo: The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic).
id USP-22_78f26d60f502d726ac1134e954ba83a4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/6177
network_acronym_str USP-22
network_name_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods Escalonamento do prestígio social por métodos psicofísicos diretos e indiretos Psicofísica sociallei de Stevensprestígio socialestimação de magnitudeSocial psychophysicsStevens Lawsocial prestigemagnitude estimates The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic). O prestígio profissional social sustentado por Assistentes Sociais, Biólogos, Dentistas, Enfermeiros, Engenheiros, Farmacêuticos, Físicos, Fisioterapeutas, Fonoaudiólogos, Médicos, Psicólogos, Químicos e Sociólogos foi escalonado pelos métodos psicofísicos de comparação aos pares (indireto) e estimação de magnitude (direto). Os resultados mostraram que: 1) ambos os métodos forneceram escalonamentos substancialmente diferentes; 2) a escala de comparações aos pares (proporção de z) é uma função logarítmica da escala de estimação de magnitude; 3) a escala de comparação aos pares (proporção de z) é uma função linear dos logaritmos da escala de estimação de magnitude; e 4) obteve-se uma alta correlação (rho = 0, 95) entre os graus de prestígio atribuídos às profissões nos dois métodos. Com estes resultados, podemos concluir que: 1) o contínuo do prestígio social (não-métrico) escalonado por estes dois métodos permite uma relação similar à obtida no contínuo sensorial (métrico); e 2) o contínuo do prestígio social possui as seguintes características: quantitativo, protético e não-quanlitativo (metatético). Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2004-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/617710.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 14 n. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 No. 27 (2004); 89-94 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 Núm. 27 (2004); 89-94 1982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177/7708Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaleiros-Sousa, FátimaSilva, José Aparecido Da2012-04-30T01:46:43Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/6177Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-04-30T01:46:43Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
Escalonamento do prestígio social por métodos psicofísicos diretos e indiretos
title Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
spellingShingle Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima
Psicofísica social
lei de Stevens
prestígio social
estimação de magnitude
Social psychophysics
Stevens Law
social prestige
magnitude estimates
title_short Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
title_full Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
title_fullStr Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
title_full_unstemmed Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
title_sort Scaling of social prestige by direct and indirect psychophysical methods
author Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima
author_facet Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima
Silva, José Aparecido Da
author_role author
author2 Silva, José Aparecido Da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faleiros-Sousa, Fátima
Silva, José Aparecido Da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psicofísica social
lei de Stevens
prestígio social
estimação de magnitude
Social psychophysics
Stevens Law
social prestige
magnitude estimates
topic Psicofísica social
lei de Stevens
prestígio social
estimação de magnitude
Social psychophysics
Stevens Law
social prestige
magnitude estimates
description The professional social prestige practiced by: Social Assistants, Biologists, Dentists, Nurses, Engineers, Pharmacists, Physicists, Physical Therapists, Phonoaudiologists, Physicians, Psychologists, Chemists, and Sociologists was scaled by psychophysical methods of pair comparisons (indirect) and the magnitude estimations (direct). The results showed: 1) both of the methods yield substantially different scaling; 2) the pair comparisons scale (proportion or z) is a logarithmic function of the magnitude estimations scale; 3) the pair of comparison scale (proportion or z) is a linear function of the logarithms of the magnitude estimations scale; and 4) a high correlation (rho = .95) between the degrees of prestige attributed to the professions obtained by both methods. With these results we can conclude that: 1) the continuous of social prestige (not metric) scaled by these two methods yield a relation similar to the obtained in the sensorial continuous (metric); and 2) the continuous of social prestige has the following characteristics: quantitative, prothetic and non-qualitative (metathetic).
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177
10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-863X2004000100012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/6177/7708
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 14 n. 27 (2004); 89-94
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 No. 27 (2004); 89-94
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 14 Núm. 27 (2004); 89-94
1982-4327
0103-863X
reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
collection Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||paideia@usp.br
_version_ 1800221830649217024