Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/80512 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to perform a survey with psychotherapists, regarding the criteria they consider relevant to measure the progress of children in psychotherapy and whether the criteria indicated by them differ according to the therapist’s theoretical approach. Therapists were contacted electronically and answered a questionnaire composed of items with criteria of positive change present in the literature. Participants were 154 child therapists from different regions of Brazil. The analysis regarding the criteria of positive change that the participants indicated and their theoretical approach suggested that, despite the theoretical differences, in practice psychotherapists seem to adopt similar criteria to interpret progress in child psychotherapies. The criteria mentioned may be useful for a better systematization of the psychotherapy techniques for children. However, due to the lack of elements to evaluate the sample’s representativeness, caution is advised in generalizing the results. |
id |
USP-22_834f46a64f6f123d97e4e3c2beca1671 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80512 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-22 |
network_name_str |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists Criterios de Progreso en Psicoterapias de Niños en la Evaluación de Psicoterapeutas Critérios de Progresso em Psicoterapias de Crianças na Avaliação de Psicoterapeutas This study aimed to perform a survey with psychotherapists, regarding the criteria they consider relevant to measure the progress of children in psychotherapy and whether the criteria indicated by them differ according to the therapist’s theoretical approach. Therapists were contacted electronically and answered a questionnaire composed of items with criteria of positive change present in the literature. Participants were 154 child therapists from different regions of Brazil. The analysis regarding the criteria of positive change that the participants indicated and their theoretical approach suggested that, despite the theoretical differences, in practice psychotherapists seem to adopt similar criteria to interpret progress in child psychotherapies. The criteria mentioned may be useful for a better systematization of the psychotherapy techniques for children. However, due to the lack of elements to evaluate the sample’s representativeness, caution is advised in generalizing the results. El trabajo tuvo como objetivos realizar un trabajo junto con psicoterapeutas infantiles, de varios aproximaciones teóricas diferentes, sobre los criterios que consideran relevantes para mensurar progreso y si estos criterios difieren de acuerdo con las diferentes líneas teóricas. Los terapeutas fueron contactados por medio electrónico. Respondieron a un cuestionario con puntos compuestos por criterios de cambio positivo presentes en la literatura. La muestra se compuso de 154 terapeutas infantiles de diferentes regiones de Brasil. El análisis involucrando los criterios de cambio positiva y la aproximación teórica del participante sugirieron que, a pesar de las diferencias teóricas, los psicoterapeutas, en la práctica, parecen apoyarse en criterios semejantes para interpretar los progresos en psicoterapias infantiles. Los criterios mencionados podrán ser útiles para una mejor sistematización de las técnicas de psicoterapias infantiles. No obstante, debido a la falta de elementos para evaluar la representatividad de la muestra, se sugiere cautela en la generalización de los resultados. O trabalho teve como objetivos fazer um levantamento junto a psicoterapeutas de crianças, de várias abordagens teóricas, sobre os critérios que consideram relevantes para aferir progresso e se estes diferem de acordo com as linhas teóricas. Os terapeutas foram contatados por meio eletrônico. Responderam a um questionário com itens compostos por critérios de mudança positiva presentes na literatura. A amostra foi composta por 154 terapeutas de crianças de diferentes regiões do Brasil. A análise envolvendo os critérios de mudança positiva e a abordagem teórica do participante sugeriram que apesar das diferenças teóricas, os psicoterapeutas, na prática, parecem se apoiar em critérios semelhantes para interpretarem o progresso em psicoterapias infantis. Os critérios mencionados poderão ser úteis para uma melhor sistematização das técnicas de psicoterapias infantis. Entretanto, devido à falta de elementos para avaliar a representatividade da amostra, sugere-se cautela na generalização dos resultados. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/8051210.1590/1982-43272457201412Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 24 n. 57 (2014); 95-104Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 24 No. 57 (2014); 95-104Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 24 Núm. 57 (2014); 95-1041982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/80512/84175Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães, Lilian Pereira de Medeiros Yoshida, Elisa Medici Pizão 2014-05-08T13:44:26Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80512Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2014-05-08T13:44:26Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists Criterios de Progreso en Psicoterapias de Niños en la Evaluación de Psicoterapeutas Critérios de Progresso em Psicoterapias de Crianças na Avaliação de Psicoterapeutas |
title |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
spellingShingle |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists Guimarães, Lilian Pereira de Medeiros |
title_short |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
title_full |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
title_fullStr |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
title_sort |
Criteria of Progress in Child Psychotherapies According to Psychotherapists |
author |
Guimarães, Lilian Pereira de Medeiros |
author_facet |
Guimarães, Lilian Pereira de Medeiros Yoshida, Elisa Medici Pizão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yoshida, Elisa Medici Pizão |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães, Lilian Pereira de Medeiros Yoshida, Elisa Medici Pizão |
description |
This study aimed to perform a survey with psychotherapists, regarding the criteria they consider relevant to measure the progress of children in psychotherapy and whether the criteria indicated by them differ according to the therapist’s theoretical approach. Therapists were contacted electronically and answered a questionnaire composed of items with criteria of positive change present in the literature. Participants were 154 child therapists from different regions of Brazil. The analysis regarding the criteria of positive change that the participants indicated and their theoretical approach suggested that, despite the theoretical differences, in practice psychotherapists seem to adopt similar criteria to interpret progress in child psychotherapies. The criteria mentioned may be useful for a better systematization of the psychotherapy techniques for children. However, due to the lack of elements to evaluate the sample’s representativeness, caution is advised in generalizing the results. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/80512 10.1590/1982-43272457201412 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/80512 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-43272457201412 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/80512/84175 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 24 n. 57 (2014); 95-104 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 24 No. 57 (2014); 95-104 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 24 Núm. 57 (2014); 95-104 1982-4327 0103-863X reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
collection |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||paideia@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221834230104064 |