Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P. Comparison of prices among sectors showed a lower purchase price in the FPB-E, followed by the FPB-P. The FPB-E charged prices that were over 90% cheaper than those in the private sector. The number of working days required to obtain treatment for hypertension and diabetes were fewer in the FPB-E. CONCLUSIONS: The lower availability found in the public sector could be one of the reasons for the migration of users from the public sector to the FPB. The high prices in the private sector also contribute for this Program to be an alternative of medicine access in Brazil. |
id |
USP-23_019123a0e0c16c7ed697b33aed63ec53 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32811 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program Precios y disponibilidad de medicamentos en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil Preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil Preço de MedicamentoMedicamentos EssenciaisSetor PúblicoSetor PrivadoPrecio de MedicamentoMedicamentos EsencialesSector PúblicoSector PrivadoDrug PriceDrugsEssentialPublic SectorPrivate Sector OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P. Comparison of prices among sectors showed a lower purchase price in the FPB-E, followed by the FPB-P. The FPB-E charged prices that were over 90% cheaper than those in the private sector. The number of working days required to obtain treatment for hypertension and diabetes were fewer in the FPB-E. CONCLUSIONS: The lower availability found in the public sector could be one of the reasons for the migration of users from the public sector to the FPB. The high prices in the private sector also contribute for this Program to be an alternative of medicine access in Brazil. OBJETIVO: Analizar el desempeño del Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil frente a los sectores público y privado, con relación a: disponibilidad, precio y costo para el paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensión y diabetes. MÉTODOS: Fue utilizada la metodología desarrollada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud en conjunto con la Acción Internacional para Salud, para comparar los precios y la disponibilidad de medicamentos. La investigación fue aplicada en mayo de 2007, en establecimientos de diferentes sectores [público, privado y las modalidades propia (FPB-P) y expansión (FPB-E) del Programa], en 30 municipios de Brasil. Los cuatro medicamentos analizados fueron: captopril 25 mg e hidroclorotiazida 25 mg, para hipertensión, y metformina 500 mg y glibenclamida 5 mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: El FPB-E presentó mayor disponibilidad de medicamentos y el sector público, la menor. Tanto en el sector público como en la FPB-P el porcentaje de disponibilidad de similares fue mayor que el de los genéricos. La comparación de precios entre los sectores mostró menor precio de adquisición en el FPB-E, seguido por el FPB-P. El FPB-E presentó economía superior a 90% con relación al sector privado. El número de días de trabajo necesarios para adquisición de tratamientos para hipertensión y diabetes fue menor en el FPB-E. CONCLUSIONES: La menor disponibilidad encontrada en el sector público puede ser una de las justificativas de la migración de los usuarios del sector público al FPB. Los altos precios practicados por el sector privado también contribuyen para que el Programa sea una alternativa de acceso a medicamentos en Brasil. OBJETIVO: Analisar o desempenho do Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil perante os setores público e privado, em relação a: disponibilidade, preço e custo, para o paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizada a metodologia desenvolvida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde em conjunto com a Ação Internacional para Saúde, para comparação de preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos. A pesquisa foi aplicada em maio de 2007, em estabelecimentos de diferentes setores [público, privado e as modalidades própria (FPB-P) e expansão (FPB-E) do Programa], em 30 municípios do Brasil. Os quatro medicamentos analisados foram: captopril 25mg e hidroclorotiazida 25mg, para hipertensão, e metformina 500mg e glibenclamida 5mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: O FPB-E apresentou maior disponibilidade de medicamentos e o setor público, a menor. Tanto no setor público quanto na FPB-P o percentual de disponibilidade de similares foi maior que o de genéricos. A comparação de preços entre os setores mostrou menor preço de aquisição no FPB-E, seguido pelo FPB-P. O FPB-E apresentou economia superior a 90% em relação ao setor privado. O número de dias de trabalho necessários para aquisição de tratamentos para hipertensão e diabetes foi menor no FPB-E. CONCLUSÕES: A menor disponibilidade encontrada no setor público pode ser uma das justificativas para migração dos usuários do setor público para o FPB. Os altos preços praticados pelo setor privado também contribuem para que o Programa seja uma alternativa de acesso a medicamentos no País. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3281110.1590/S0034-89102010005000021Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 No. 4 (2010); 611-619 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 4 (2010); 611-619 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 44 n. 4 (2010); 611-619 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811/35328https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811/35329Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Cláudia Du Bocage SantosMiranda, Elaine SilvaEmmerick, Isabel Cristina MartinsCosta, Nilson do RosárioCastro, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio de2012-07-10T02:23:07Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32811Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-10T02:23:07Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program Precios y disponibilidad de medicamentos en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil Preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil |
title |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
spellingShingle |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program Pinto, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos Preço de Medicamento Medicamentos Essenciais Setor Público Setor Privado Precio de Medicamento Medicamentos Esenciales Sector Público Sector Privado Drug Price Drugs Essential Public Sector Private Sector |
title_short |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
title_full |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
title_fullStr |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
title_sort |
Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program |
author |
Pinto, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos |
author_facet |
Pinto, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos Miranda, Elaine Silva Emmerick, Isabel Cristina Martins Costa, Nilson do Rosário Castro, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda, Elaine Silva Emmerick, Isabel Cristina Martins Costa, Nilson do Rosário Castro, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos Miranda, Elaine Silva Emmerick, Isabel Cristina Martins Costa, Nilson do Rosário Castro, Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Preço de Medicamento Medicamentos Essenciais Setor Público Setor Privado Precio de Medicamento Medicamentos Esenciales Sector Público Sector Privado Drug Price Drugs Essential Public Sector Private Sector |
topic |
Preço de Medicamento Medicamentos Essenciais Setor Público Setor Privado Precio de Medicamento Medicamentos Esenciales Sector Público Sector Privado Drug Price Drugs Essential Public Sector Private Sector |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P. Comparison of prices among sectors showed a lower purchase price in the FPB-E, followed by the FPB-P. The FPB-E charged prices that were over 90% cheaper than those in the private sector. The number of working days required to obtain treatment for hypertension and diabetes were fewer in the FPB-E. CONCLUSIONS: The lower availability found in the public sector could be one of the reasons for the migration of users from the public sector to the FPB. The high prices in the private sector also contribute for this Program to be an alternative of medicine access in Brazil. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811 10.1590/S0034-89102010005000021 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102010005000021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811/35328 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32811/35329 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 No. 4 (2010); 611-619 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 4 (2010); 611-619 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 44 n. 4 (2010); 611-619 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221791015141376 |