BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Susan M
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Dantas, Odimariles Maria Souza, Ximenes, Ricardo, Barreto, Mauricio L
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-89102007000800009
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The BCG vaccine has been in use since 1921, but still arouses controversy and uncertainties. The objective was to analyze the protective effect of the BCG vaccine in its first and second doses and the accompanying vaccination policies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in both English and Spanish was carried out, covering the period 1948 to 2006, using the PubMed database. The main search terms used included BCG vaccine, BCG efficacy, BCG and tuberculosis. The studies were grouped by design, with the main results from the clinic tests, case-control studies and meta-analyses presented separately. RESULTS: The protective effect of the first dose of the BCG vaccine against tuberculosis in its miliary and meningeal forms is high. However, the results vary in relation to the pulmonary form of the disease, with some indicating zero effect and others levels of nearly 80%. Research is being carried out to develop new vaccines that could substitute the BCG or be used as a booster. CONCLUSIONS: There are evidences that the protective effect of the BCG vaccine does not increase with a second dose. In spite of its limitations and the expectation that a new tuberculosis vaccine will be developed in the future, the BCG vaccine remains an important tool in controlling the harmful effects of tuberculosis, particularly in countries with medium or high incidence levels of the disease.
id USP-23_0b3ef9d9ba466962d619a5a39405df14
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32292
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
spelling BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies Vacina BCG contra tuberculose: efeito protetor e políticas de vacinação Tuberculose^i1^sprevenção e contrVacina BCG^i1^sprovisão e distribuiVacina BCG^i1^shistóProgramas de imunizaçãoRevisãoTuberculosis^i2^sprevention & contBCG Vaccine^i2^ssupply & distributBCG vaccine^i2^shistImmunization programsReview OBJECTIVE: The BCG vaccine has been in use since 1921, but still arouses controversy and uncertainties. The objective was to analyze the protective effect of the BCG vaccine in its first and second doses and the accompanying vaccination policies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in both English and Spanish was carried out, covering the period 1948 to 2006, using the PubMed database. The main search terms used included BCG vaccine, BCG efficacy, BCG and tuberculosis. The studies were grouped by design, with the main results from the clinic tests, case-control studies and meta-analyses presented separately. RESULTS: The protective effect of the first dose of the BCG vaccine against tuberculosis in its miliary and meningeal forms is high. However, the results vary in relation to the pulmonary form of the disease, with some indicating zero effect and others levels of nearly 80%. Research is being carried out to develop new vaccines that could substitute the BCG or be used as a booster. CONCLUSIONS: There are evidences that the protective effect of the BCG vaccine does not increase with a second dose. In spite of its limitations and the expectation that a new tuberculosis vaccine will be developed in the future, the BCG vaccine remains an important tool in controlling the harmful effects of tuberculosis, particularly in countries with medium or high incidence levels of the disease. OBJETIVO: A vacina BCG é utilizada desde 1921, embora ainda apresente controvérsias e aspectos não esclarecidos. O objetivo do artigo foi analisar aspectos relacionados ao efeito protetor da primeira e segunda doses da vacina BCG e as políticas de vacinação adotadas. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada revisão sistemática da literatura publicada em inglês e espanhol, abrangendo o período compreendido entre 1948 e 2006, na base PubMed. Os principais descritores utilizados foram BCG vaccine, BCG efficacy, BCG e tuberculosis. Os estudos foram agrupados por tipo de desenho, apresentando-se separadamente os principais resultados de ensaios clínicos, estudos de caso-controle e metanálises. RESULTADOS: O efeito protetor da primeira dose da vacina BCG contra a tuberculose na forma miliar ou na meningite é elevado. No entanto, os resultados são discordantes em relação à forma pulmonar, variando de ausência de efeito a níveis próximos a 80%. Estão sendo conduzidas pesquisas sobre novas vacinas candidatas a substituir a BCG ou serem utilizadas como reforço. CONCLUSÕES: Há evidências de que a segunda dose da BCG não aumenta o seu efeito protetor. Apesar de seus limites e da expectativa futura de nova vacina para tuberculose, a vacina BCG mantém-se como importante instrumento no controle dos efeitos danosos da doença, sobretudo em países com taxas de incidência médias e elevadas. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2007-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3229210.1590/S0034-89102007000800009Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292/34444https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292/34445Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Susan MDantas, Odimariles Maria SouzaXimenes, RicardoBarreto, Mauricio L2012-07-09T00:41:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32292Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-09T00:41:05Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
Vacina BCG contra tuberculose: efeito protetor e políticas de vacinação
title BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
spellingShingle BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
Pereira, Susan M
Tuberculose^i1^sprevenção e contr
Vacina BCG^i1^sprovisão e distribui
Vacina BCG^i1^shistó
Programas de imunização
Revisão
Tuberculosis^i2^sprevention & cont
BCG Vaccine^i2^ssupply & distribut
BCG vaccine^i2^shist
Immunization programs
Review
Pereira, Susan M
Tuberculose^i1^sprevenção e contr
Vacina BCG^i1^sprovisão e distribui
Vacina BCG^i1^shistó
Programas de imunização
Revisão
Tuberculosis^i2^sprevention & cont
BCG Vaccine^i2^ssupply & distribut
BCG vaccine^i2^shist
Immunization programs
Review
title_short BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
title_full BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
title_fullStr BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
title_full_unstemmed BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
title_sort BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: its protective effect and vaccination policies
author Pereira, Susan M
author_facet Pereira, Susan M
Pereira, Susan M
Dantas, Odimariles Maria Souza
Ximenes, Ricardo
Barreto, Mauricio L
Dantas, Odimariles Maria Souza
Ximenes, Ricardo
Barreto, Mauricio L
author_role author
author2 Dantas, Odimariles Maria Souza
Ximenes, Ricardo
Barreto, Mauricio L
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Susan M
Dantas, Odimariles Maria Souza
Ximenes, Ricardo
Barreto, Mauricio L
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tuberculose^i1^sprevenção e contr
Vacina BCG^i1^sprovisão e distribui
Vacina BCG^i1^shistó
Programas de imunização
Revisão
Tuberculosis^i2^sprevention & cont
BCG Vaccine^i2^ssupply & distribut
BCG vaccine^i2^shist
Immunization programs
Review
topic Tuberculose^i1^sprevenção e contr
Vacina BCG^i1^sprovisão e distribui
Vacina BCG^i1^shistó
Programas de imunização
Revisão
Tuberculosis^i2^sprevention & cont
BCG Vaccine^i2^ssupply & distribut
BCG vaccine^i2^shist
Immunization programs
Review
description OBJECTIVE: The BCG vaccine has been in use since 1921, but still arouses controversy and uncertainties. The objective was to analyze the protective effect of the BCG vaccine in its first and second doses and the accompanying vaccination policies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in both English and Spanish was carried out, covering the period 1948 to 2006, using the PubMed database. The main search terms used included BCG vaccine, BCG efficacy, BCG and tuberculosis. The studies were grouped by design, with the main results from the clinic tests, case-control studies and meta-analyses presented separately. RESULTS: The protective effect of the first dose of the BCG vaccine against tuberculosis in its miliary and meningeal forms is high. However, the results vary in relation to the pulmonary form of the disease, with some indicating zero effect and others levels of nearly 80%. Research is being carried out to develop new vaccines that could substitute the BCG or be used as a booster. CONCLUSIONS: There are evidences that the protective effect of the BCG vaccine does not increase with a second dose. In spite of its limitations and the expectation that a new tuberculosis vaccine will be developed in the future, the BCG vaccine remains an important tool in controlling the harmful effects of tuberculosis, particularly in countries with medium or high incidence levels of the disease.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292
10.1590/S0034-89102007000800009
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102007000800009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292/34444
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32292/34445
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. suppl.1 (2007); 59-66
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1822179093394751488
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102007000800009