Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hurtado-Roca, Yamilée
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Becerra-Chauca, Naysha, Malca, Magaly
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
spa
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of the use of cryotherapy, cold knife or thermocoagulation compared to Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing treatment with cryotherapy, cold knife, or thermo-coagulation compared with LEEP, to estimate its efficacy and safety. The search was conducted on MEDLINE/PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus, until September 2018. RESULTS: The total of 72 studies were identified, of which only 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The treatment of CIN with cold knife decreases the risk of residual disease compared with LEEP (RR, 0.54, 95%CI, 0.30–0.96, p = 0.04). The management of premalignant lesions with cryotherapy, compared with LEEP, increases the risk of disease recurrence by 86% (RR, 1.86, 95%CI, 1.16–2.97, p = 0.01), increases the risk of infections (RR, 1.17, 95%CI, 1.08–1.28, p < 0.001) and reduces the risk of minor bleeding by 51% (RR, 0.49, 95%CI) %, 0.40–0.59, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of premalignant lesions of cervical cancer with cold knife reduces the risk of residual disease. Nevertheless, cryotherapy reduces the risk of minor bleeding in the 24 hours after treatment and increases the risk of recurrence of disease and infections.
id USP-23_0e5f5df7a6d755fa41fea7565d88b9aa
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/167657
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic reviewEficacia y seguridad de crioterapia, cono frio o termo-coagulación en comparación con LEEP como terapia para la neoplasia intraepitelial cervical: Revisión sistemáticaCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiatherapyCryotherapyConizationElectrosurgeryUterine Cervical NeoplasmsSystematic ReviewNeoplasia Intraepitelial CervicalterapiaCrioterapiaConizaciónElectrocirugíaNeoplasias del Cuello UterinoRevisión SistemáticaOBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of the use of cryotherapy, cold knife or thermocoagulation compared to Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing treatment with cryotherapy, cold knife, or thermo-coagulation compared with LEEP, to estimate its efficacy and safety. The search was conducted on MEDLINE/PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus, until September 2018. RESULTS: The total of 72 studies were identified, of which only 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The treatment of CIN with cold knife decreases the risk of residual disease compared with LEEP (RR, 0.54, 95%CI, 0.30–0.96, p = 0.04). The management of premalignant lesions with cryotherapy, compared with LEEP, increases the risk of disease recurrence by 86% (RR, 1.86, 95%CI, 1.16–2.97, p = 0.01), increases the risk of infections (RR, 1.17, 95%CI, 1.08–1.28, p < 0.001) and reduces the risk of minor bleeding by 51% (RR, 0.49, 95%CI) %, 0.40–0.59, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of premalignant lesions of cervical cancer with cold knife reduces the risk of residual disease. Nevertheless, cryotherapy reduces the risk of minor bleeding in the 24 hours after treatment and increases the risk of recurrence of disease and infections.OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad del uso de crioterapia, cono frio o termo-coagulación en comparación con el procedimiento de escisión electroquirúrgica en asa (LEEP) para el manejo de neoplasias intraepiteliales cervicales. MÉTODOS: Revisión sistemática de ensayos controlados aleatorizados en mujeres con neoplasia intraepitelial cervical en tratamiento con crioterapia, cono frio, o termo coagulación y LEEP, para estimar su eficacia y seguridad. La búsqueda se realizó en MEDLINE/PUBMED, Registro Cochrane Central de Ensayos Controlados (CENTRAL) y Scopus, hasta setiembre de 2018. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 72 estudios, ocho cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Cono frio disminuyó el riesgo de enfermedad residual en comparación con LEEP (RR 0,54; IC del 95%, 0,30–0,96, p = 0,04). Crioterapia en comparación con LEEP incrementó el riesgo de recurrencia de enfermedad en un 86,0% (RR 1,86; IC del 95%, 1,16–2,97, p = 0,01) con un tiempo de seguimiento de seis a 24 meses, y de infecciones (RR, 1,17; IC del 95%, 1,08–1,28, p < 0,001); pero redujo el riesgo de sangrado menor en un 51,0% (RR 0,49; IC del 95%, 0,40–0,59, p ≤ 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Cono frio reduce el riesgo de enfermedad residual. Sin embargo, la crioterapia reduce el riesgo de sangrado menor en las 24 horas posteriores al tratamiento e incrementa el riesgo de recurrencia de enfermedad y de infecciones.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2020-03-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/16765710.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001750Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 27Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 27Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 271518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159893https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159895https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159894Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHurtado-Roca, YamiléeBecerra-Chauca, NayshaMalca, Magaly2020-03-24T20:14:27Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/167657Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2020-03-24T20:14:27Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
Eficacia y seguridad de crioterapia, cono frio o termo-coagulación en comparación con LEEP como terapia para la neoplasia intraepitelial cervical: Revisión sistemática
title Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
spellingShingle Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
Hurtado-Roca, Yamilée
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
therapy
Cryotherapy
Conization
Electrosurgery
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Systematic Review
Neoplasia Intraepitelial Cervical
terapia
Crioterapia
Conización
Electrocirugía
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino
Revisión Sistemática
title_short Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
title_full Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
title_sort Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review
author Hurtado-Roca, Yamilée
author_facet Hurtado-Roca, Yamilée
Becerra-Chauca, Naysha
Malca, Magaly
author_role author
author2 Becerra-Chauca, Naysha
Malca, Magaly
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hurtado-Roca, Yamilée
Becerra-Chauca, Naysha
Malca, Magaly
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
therapy
Cryotherapy
Conization
Electrosurgery
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Systematic Review
Neoplasia Intraepitelial Cervical
terapia
Crioterapia
Conización
Electrocirugía
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino
Revisión Sistemática
topic Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
therapy
Cryotherapy
Conization
Electrosurgery
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Systematic Review
Neoplasia Intraepitelial Cervical
terapia
Crioterapia
Conización
Electrocirugía
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino
Revisión Sistemática
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of the use of cryotherapy, cold knife or thermocoagulation compared to Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing treatment with cryotherapy, cold knife, or thermo-coagulation compared with LEEP, to estimate its efficacy and safety. The search was conducted on MEDLINE/PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus, until September 2018. RESULTS: The total of 72 studies were identified, of which only 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The treatment of CIN with cold knife decreases the risk of residual disease compared with LEEP (RR, 0.54, 95%CI, 0.30–0.96, p = 0.04). The management of premalignant lesions with cryotherapy, compared with LEEP, increases the risk of disease recurrence by 86% (RR, 1.86, 95%CI, 1.16–2.97, p = 0.01), increases the risk of infections (RR, 1.17, 95%CI, 1.08–1.28, p < 0.001) and reduces the risk of minor bleeding by 51% (RR, 0.49, 95%CI) %, 0.40–0.59, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of premalignant lesions of cervical cancer with cold knife reduces the risk of residual disease. Nevertheless, cryotherapy reduces the risk of minor bleeding in the 24 hours after treatment and increases the risk of recurrence of disease and infections.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657
10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001750
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001750
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159893
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159895
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/167657/159894
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 27
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 27
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 27
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221801253437440