Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on tuberculosis (TB) incidence rates of removal of improper duplicate records from the notification system. METHODS: Data from the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Brazilian Information System for Tuberculosis Notification) from 2000 to 2004 were analyzed. Repeat records were identified through probabilistic record linkage and classified into six mutually exclusive categories and then kept, combined or removed from database. RESULTS: Of all TB records, 73.7% had no duplicate, 18.9% were duplicate, 4.7% were triplicate, and 2.7% were quadruplicate or more. Of all repeat records, 47.3% were classified as transfer in/out; 23.6% return after default, 16.4% true duplicates, 10% relapse, 2.5% inconclusive and 0.2% had missing data. These proportions were different in Brazilian states. Removal of improper duplicate records reduced TB incidence rate per 100.000 inhabitants by 6.1% in the year 2000 (from 44 to 41.3), 8.3% in 2001 (from 44.5 to 40.8), 9.4% in 2002 (from 45.8 to 41.5), 9.2% in 2003 (from 46.9 to 42.6) and 8.4% in 2004 (from 45.4 to 41.6). CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the observed tuberculosis incidence rates represent estimates that would be closer to the actual rates than those obtained from the raw database at state and country level. The use of record linkage approach should be promoted for better quality of notification system data. |
id |
USP-23_0fa53bc4581f084da1173e2ad8d8c381 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/32293 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records Efeito da remoção de notificações repetidas sobre a incidência da tuberculose no Brasil Tuberculose^i1^sepidemioloNotificação de doençasRegistros de doençasFontes de dadosSistemas de Informação BrasilTuberculosis^i2^sepidemiolDisease NotificationDiseases registriesData sourcesInformation SystemsBrazil OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on tuberculosis (TB) incidence rates of removal of improper duplicate records from the notification system. METHODS: Data from the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Brazilian Information System for Tuberculosis Notification) from 2000 to 2004 were analyzed. Repeat records were identified through probabilistic record linkage and classified into six mutually exclusive categories and then kept, combined or removed from database. RESULTS: Of all TB records, 73.7% had no duplicate, 18.9% were duplicate, 4.7% were triplicate, and 2.7% were quadruplicate or more. Of all repeat records, 47.3% were classified as transfer in/out; 23.6% return after default, 16.4% true duplicates, 10% relapse, 2.5% inconclusive and 0.2% had missing data. These proportions were different in Brazilian states. Removal of improper duplicate records reduced TB incidence rate per 100.000 inhabitants by 6.1% in the year 2000 (from 44 to 41.3), 8.3% in 2001 (from 44.5 to 40.8), 9.4% in 2002 (from 45.8 to 41.5), 9.2% in 2003 (from 46.9 to 42.6) and 8.4% in 2004 (from 45.4 to 41.6). CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the observed tuberculosis incidence rates represent estimates that would be closer to the actual rates than those obtained from the raw database at state and country level. The use of record linkage approach should be promoted for better quality of notification system data. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto nas taxas de incidência de tuberculose com a exclusão de registros indevidamente repetidos no sistema de notificação. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados dados do Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação do Ministério da Saúde, referentes ao período de 2000 a 2004. Os registros repetidos foram identificados por pareamento probabilístico e classificados em seis categorias excludentes que determinaram suas remoções, vinculações ou permanências na base. RESULTADOS: Verificou-se que 73,7% das notificações eram únicas, 18,9% formavam duplas, 4,7% triplas e 2,7% grupos de quatro ou mais registros. Dentre os registros repetidos, 47,3% foram classificados como transferência entre unidades de saúde, 23,6% reingresso, 16,4% duplicidade verdadeira, 10% recidiva, 2,5% foram inconclusivos e 0,2% tinham dados incompletos. Essas percentagens variaram entre estados. A exclusão de registros indevidamente repetidos resultou em redução na taxa de incidência por 100.000 habitantes de 6,1% em 2000 (de 44 para 41,3), 8,3% em 2001 (de 44,5 para 40,8), 9,4% em 2002 (de 45,8 para 41,5), 9,2% em 2003 (de 46,9 para 42,6) e 8,4% em 2004 (de 45,4 para 41,6). CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que as taxas observadas de incidência de tuberculose representem estimativas mais próximas do que seriam os valores reais do que as obtidas com a base em seu estado bruto, tanto em nível nacional como estadual. A prática de pareamento de registros de notificação de tuberculose deve ser estimulada e mantida para melhoria da qualidade dos dados de notificação. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2007-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3229310.1590/S0034-89102007000800010Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293/34446https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293/34447Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBierrenbach, Ana LuizaStevens, Antony PeterGomes, Adriana Bacelar FerreiraNoronha, Elza FerreiraGlatt, RuthCarvalho, Carolina NovaesOliveira Junior, João Gregório deSouza, Maria de Fátima Marinho de2012-07-09T00:41:15Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/32293Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-09T00:41:15Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records Efeito da remoção de notificações repetidas sobre a incidência da tuberculose no Brasil |
title |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
spellingShingle |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Tuberculose^i1^sepidemiolo Notificação de doenças Registros de doenças Fontes de dados Sistemas de Informação Brasil Tuberculosis^i2^sepidemiol Disease Notification Diseases registries Data sources Information Systems Brazil |
title_short |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
title_full |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
title_fullStr |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
title_sort |
Impact on tuberculosis incidence rates of removal of repeat notification records |
author |
Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza |
author_facet |
Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Stevens, Antony Peter Gomes, Adriana Bacelar Ferreira Noronha, Elza Ferreira Glatt, Ruth Carvalho, Carolina Novaes Oliveira Junior, João Gregório de Souza, Maria de Fátima Marinho de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stevens, Antony Peter Gomes, Adriana Bacelar Ferreira Noronha, Elza Ferreira Glatt, Ruth Carvalho, Carolina Novaes Oliveira Junior, João Gregório de Souza, Maria de Fátima Marinho de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza Stevens, Antony Peter Gomes, Adriana Bacelar Ferreira Noronha, Elza Ferreira Glatt, Ruth Carvalho, Carolina Novaes Oliveira Junior, João Gregório de Souza, Maria de Fátima Marinho de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tuberculose^i1^sepidemiolo Notificação de doenças Registros de doenças Fontes de dados Sistemas de Informação Brasil Tuberculosis^i2^sepidemiol Disease Notification Diseases registries Data sources Information Systems Brazil |
topic |
Tuberculose^i1^sepidemiolo Notificação de doenças Registros de doenças Fontes de dados Sistemas de Informação Brasil Tuberculosis^i2^sepidemiol Disease Notification Diseases registries Data sources Information Systems Brazil |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on tuberculosis (TB) incidence rates of removal of improper duplicate records from the notification system. METHODS: Data from the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Brazilian Information System for Tuberculosis Notification) from 2000 to 2004 were analyzed. Repeat records were identified through probabilistic record linkage and classified into six mutually exclusive categories and then kept, combined or removed from database. RESULTS: Of all TB records, 73.7% had no duplicate, 18.9% were duplicate, 4.7% were triplicate, and 2.7% were quadruplicate or more. Of all repeat records, 47.3% were classified as transfer in/out; 23.6% return after default, 16.4% true duplicates, 10% relapse, 2.5% inconclusive and 0.2% had missing data. These proportions were different in Brazilian states. Removal of improper duplicate records reduced TB incidence rate per 100.000 inhabitants by 6.1% in the year 2000 (from 44 to 41.3), 8.3% in 2001 (from 44.5 to 40.8), 9.4% in 2002 (from 45.8 to 41.5), 9.2% in 2003 (from 46.9 to 42.6) and 8.4% in 2004 (from 45.4 to 41.6). CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that the observed tuberculosis incidence rates represent estimates that would be closer to the actual rates than those obtained from the raw database at state and country level. The use of record linkage approach should be promoted for better quality of notification system data. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293 10.1590/S0034-89102007000800010 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102007000800010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293/34446 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/32293/34447 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 No. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 41 Núm. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 41 n. suppl.1 (2007); 67-76 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221786763165696 |