Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monguilhott,Juliana Jacques da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Brüggemann,Odaléa Maria, Freitas,Paulo Fontoura, d'Orsi,Eleonora
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100200
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went into labor. The data were collected between February and August 2011, by interviews and medical records. We performed a bivariate and multivariate analysis, calculating the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS Most women had a companion during labor (51.7%), but few remained during delivery (39.4%) or cesarean section (34.8%). Less than half of the women had access to several recommended practices, while non-recommended practices continue to be performed. In the model adjusted for age, education level, source of payment for the delivery, parity, and score of the Brazilian Association of Market Research Institutes, the presence of a companion was statistically associated with a greater supply of liquids and food (aPR = 1.34), dietary prescription (aPR = 1.34), use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (aPR = 1.37), amniotomy (aPR = 1.10), epidural or spinal analgesia (aPR = 1.84), adoption of non-lithotomy position in the delivery (aPR = 1.77), stay in the same room during labor, delivery, and postpartum (aPR = 1.62), skin-to-skin contact in the delivery (aPR = 1.81) and cesarean section (PR = 2.43), as well as reduced use of the Kristeller maneuver (aPR = 0.67), trichotomy (aPR = 0.59), and enema (aPR = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS In the South region of Brazil, most women do not have access to the best practices in addition to undergoing several unnecessary interventions. The presence of a companion is associated with several beneficial practices and the reduction in some interventions, although other interventions are not impacted.
id USP-23_153682e9b311805044e30508681e9392
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102018000100200
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of BrazilHumanizing DeliveryHumanization of AssistancePatient RightsEvidence-Based PracticeMaternal-Child Health ServicesABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went into labor. The data were collected between February and August 2011, by interviews and medical records. We performed a bivariate and multivariate analysis, calculating the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS Most women had a companion during labor (51.7%), but few remained during delivery (39.4%) or cesarean section (34.8%). Less than half of the women had access to several recommended practices, while non-recommended practices continue to be performed. In the model adjusted for age, education level, source of payment for the delivery, parity, and score of the Brazilian Association of Market Research Institutes, the presence of a companion was statistically associated with a greater supply of liquids and food (aPR = 1.34), dietary prescription (aPR = 1.34), use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (aPR = 1.37), amniotomy (aPR = 1.10), epidural or spinal analgesia (aPR = 1.84), adoption of non-lithotomy position in the delivery (aPR = 1.77), stay in the same room during labor, delivery, and postpartum (aPR = 1.62), skin-to-skin contact in the delivery (aPR = 1.81) and cesarean section (PR = 2.43), as well as reduced use of the Kristeller maneuver (aPR = 0.67), trichotomy (aPR = 0.59), and enema (aPR = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS In the South region of Brazil, most women do not have access to the best practices in addition to undergoing several unnecessary interventions. The presence of a companion is associated with several beneficial practices and the reduction in some interventions, although other interventions are not impacted.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100200Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 2018reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052006258info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonguilhott,Juliana Jacques da CostaBrüggemann,Odaléa MariaFreitas,Paulo Fontourad'Orsi,Eleonoraeng2018-01-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102018000100200Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2018-01-15T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
spellingShingle Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
Monguilhott,Juliana Jacques da Costa
Humanizing Delivery
Humanization of Assistance
Patient Rights
Evidence-Based Practice
Maternal-Child Health Services
title_short Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_full Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_fullStr Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_sort Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
author Monguilhott,Juliana Jacques da Costa
author_facet Monguilhott,Juliana Jacques da Costa
Brüggemann,Odaléa Maria
Freitas,Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi,Eleonora
author_role author
author2 Brüggemann,Odaléa Maria
Freitas,Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi,Eleonora
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monguilhott,Juliana Jacques da Costa
Brüggemann,Odaléa Maria
Freitas,Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi,Eleonora
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Humanizing Delivery
Humanization of Assistance
Patient Rights
Evidence-Based Practice
Maternal-Child Health Services
topic Humanizing Delivery
Humanization of Assistance
Patient Rights
Evidence-Based Practice
Maternal-Child Health Services
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went into labor. The data were collected between February and August 2011, by interviews and medical records. We performed a bivariate and multivariate analysis, calculating the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS Most women had a companion during labor (51.7%), but few remained during delivery (39.4%) or cesarean section (34.8%). Less than half of the women had access to several recommended practices, while non-recommended practices continue to be performed. In the model adjusted for age, education level, source of payment for the delivery, parity, and score of the Brazilian Association of Market Research Institutes, the presence of a companion was statistically associated with a greater supply of liquids and food (aPR = 1.34), dietary prescription (aPR = 1.34), use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (aPR = 1.37), amniotomy (aPR = 1.10), epidural or spinal analgesia (aPR = 1.84), adoption of non-lithotomy position in the delivery (aPR = 1.77), stay in the same room during labor, delivery, and postpartum (aPR = 1.62), skin-to-skin contact in the delivery (aPR = 1.81) and cesarean section (PR = 2.43), as well as reduced use of the Kristeller maneuver (aPR = 0.67), trichotomy (aPR = 0.59), and enema (aPR = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS In the South region of Brazil, most women do not have access to the best practices in addition to undergoing several unnecessary interventions. The presence of a companion is associated with several beneficial practices and the reduction in some interventions, although other interventions are not impacted.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052006258
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 2018
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936504621662208