Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases. |
id |
USP-23_1cd7a3bf022b0da61dd3df7c98107579 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31958 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating Validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating DemênciaDeliriumdemênciatranstorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivosIdosoClinical Dementia RatingTestes psicológicosDementia. Deliriumdementiaamnesticcognitive disordersAgedClinical Dementia RatingPsychological tests OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases. OBJETIVO: Analisar a validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating para classificar a função cognitiva de idosos. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se o instrumento Mini-Mental State Examination para rastreamento de déficit cognitivo em coorte composta por 424 idosos. Foram selecionados todos que obtiveram escores ;26. Os 156 idosos selecionados foram submetidos a uma avaliação clínica e testes neuropsicológicos para diagnóstico de casos de demência. Tanto os casos como os não-casos foram classificados segundo a versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating em: normais, casos questionáveis e casos de demência leve, moderada ou grave. RESULTADOS: Entre os 156 avaliados, 122 eram não-casos, destes 62 (51%) foram classificados como normais (CDR=0) e questionáveis 60 (49%) (CDR=0,5). Entre os 34 casos de demência, 17 (50%) foram classificados como demência leve (CDR=1), 8 (23%) moderada (CDR=2) e 6 (18%) grave (CDR=3). Apenas três (9%) dos casos foram considerados questionáveis pelo Clinical Dementia Rating. Sua sensibilidade foi de 91,2% e a especificidade de 100%, com valor preditivo positivo de 100% e negativo de 97,6%. As pontuações no Mini-Mental State Examination declinaram significativamente conforme o grau de demência. CONCLUSÕES: O Clinical Dementia Rating mostrou ser instrumento válido para classificar o grau de demência entre idosos. Quase metade dos não-casos foram casos questionáveis pelo Clinical Dementia Rating e podem corresponder a casos de transtorno cognitivo leve, com maior risco de conversão em demência. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3195810.1590/S0034-89102005000600007Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 6 (2005); 912-917 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33958https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33959Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz MRamos, Luiz Roberto2012-07-08T22:48:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31958Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:48:58Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating Validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating |
title |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
spellingShingle |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M Demência Delirium demência transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos Idoso Clinical Dementia Rating Testes psicológicos Dementia. Delirium dementia amnestic cognitive disorders Aged Clinical Dementia Rating Psychological tests |
title_short |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
title_full |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
title_fullStr |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
title_sort |
Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating |
author |
Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M |
author_facet |
Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M Ramos, Luiz Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramos, Luiz Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M Ramos, Luiz Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Demência Delirium demência transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos Idoso Clinical Dementia Rating Testes psicológicos Dementia. Delirium dementia amnestic cognitive disorders Aged Clinical Dementia Rating Psychological tests |
topic |
Demência Delirium demência transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos Idoso Clinical Dementia Rating Testes psicológicos Dementia. Delirium dementia amnestic cognitive disorders Aged Clinical Dementia Rating Psychological tests |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958 10.1590/S0034-89102005000600007 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-89102005000600007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33958 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33959 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 6 (2005); 912-917 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221783801987072 |