Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases.
id USP-23_1cd7a3bf022b0da61dd3df7c98107579
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/31958
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating Validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating DemênciaDeliriumdemênciatranstorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivosIdosoClinical Dementia RatingTestes psicológicosDementia. Deliriumdementiaamnesticcognitive disordersAgedClinical Dementia RatingPsychological tests OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases. OBJETIVO: Analisar a validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating para classificar a função cognitiva de idosos. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se o instrumento Mini-Mental State Examination para rastreamento de déficit cognitivo em coorte composta por 424 idosos. Foram selecionados todos que obtiveram escores ;26. Os 156 idosos selecionados foram submetidos a uma avaliação clínica e testes neuropsicológicos para diagnóstico de casos de demência. Tanto os casos como os não-casos foram classificados segundo a versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating em: normais, casos questionáveis e casos de demência leve, moderada ou grave. RESULTADOS: Entre os 156 avaliados, 122 eram não-casos, destes 62 (51%) foram classificados como normais (CDR=0) e questionáveis 60 (49%) (CDR=0,5). Entre os 34 casos de demência, 17 (50%) foram classificados como demência leve (CDR=1), 8 (23%) moderada (CDR=2) e 6 (18%) grave (CDR=3). Apenas três (9%) dos casos foram considerados questionáveis pelo Clinical Dementia Rating. Sua sensibilidade foi de 91,2% e a especificidade de 100%, com valor preditivo positivo de 100% e negativo de 97,6%. As pontuações no Mini-Mental State Examination declinaram significativamente conforme o grau de demência. CONCLUSÕES: O Clinical Dementia Rating mostrou ser instrumento válido para classificar o grau de demência entre idosos. Quase metade dos não-casos foram casos questionáveis pelo Clinical Dementia Rating e podem corresponder a casos de transtorno cognitivo leve, com maior risco de conversão em demência. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/3195810.1590/S0034-89102005000600007Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 6 (2005); 912-917 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 6 (2005); 912-917 1518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33958https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33959Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz MRamos, Luiz Roberto2012-07-08T22:48:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/31958Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2012-07-08T22:48:58Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
Validade da versão em português da Clinical Dementia Rating
title Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
spellingShingle Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M
Demência
Delirium
demência
transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos
Idoso
Clinical Dementia Rating
Testes psicológicos
Dementia. Delirium
dementia
amnestic
cognitive disorders
Aged
Clinical Dementia Rating
Psychological tests
title_short Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
title_full Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
title_fullStr Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
title_sort Validity of the Portuguese version of Clinical Dementia Rating
author Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M
author_facet Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M
Ramos, Luiz Roberto
author_role author
author2 Ramos, Luiz Roberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Macedo Montaño, Maria Beatriz M
Ramos, Luiz Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Demência
Delirium
demência
transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos
Idoso
Clinical Dementia Rating
Testes psicológicos
Dementia. Delirium
dementia
amnestic
cognitive disorders
Aged
Clinical Dementia Rating
Psychological tests
topic Demência
Delirium
demência
transtorno amnéstico e outros transtornos cognitivos
Idoso
Clinical Dementia Rating
Testes psicológicos
Dementia. Delirium
dementia
amnestic
cognitive disorders
Aged
Clinical Dementia Rating
Psychological tests
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating for classifying the cognitive function among the elderly. METHODS: The Mini Mental State Examination was utilized as a screening method for cognitive deficit among a cohort of 424 elderly. All those who scored ;26 were included in the study. The 156 subjects selected were submitted to clinical evaluation and neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of dementia. Afterwards, both cases and non-cases were classified, according to the Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating, in the categories normal, borderline, mild, moderate and severe dementia. RESULTS: Among the 156 subjects selected, 122 were non-cases, 62 (51%) were classified as normal (CDR=0) and 60 (49%) as borderline (CDR=0.5). Among the 34 cases of dementia, 17 (50%) were classified as mild dementia (CDR=1), eight (23%) as moderate (CDR=2) and six (18%) as severe dementia (CDR=3). Only three (9%) of the cases were considered borderline cases by the Clinical Dementia Rating. Its sensibility was 91.2% and the specificity was100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97.6%. The Mini Mental State Examination scores declined significantly according to the degree of dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese version of the Clinical Dementia Rating is a valid instrument for classifying the dementia status of the elderly. Almost half the cases considered normal by the diagnostic criteria of the Mini Mental State Examination were borderline cases according to the Clinical Dementia Rating and might correspond to cases of mild cognitive impairment, with an increased risk of conversion to dementia cases.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958
10.1590/S0034-89102005000600007
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-89102005000600007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33958
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/31958/33959
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 No. 6 (2005); 912-917
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 39 Núm. 6 (2005); 912-917
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 39 n. 6 (2005); 912-917
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221783801987072