AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gama,Zenewton André da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Saturno-Hernandez,Pedro Jesus, Caldas,Anna Claudia Sales Gomes, Freitas,Marise Reis de, Mendonça,Ana Elza Oliveira de, Medeiros,Carlos Alexandre de Souza, Medeiros,Wilton Rodrigues, Kessler,Oliver, Soares,Diogo Penha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100217
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the development and the validity analysis of the Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care Questionnaire (AGRASS). METHODS This is a validation study of a measurement instrument following the stages: 1) Development of conceptual model and items; 2) Formal multidisciplinary assessment; 3) Nominal group for validity analysis with national specialists; 4) Development of software and national pilot study in 62 Brazilian hospitals 5) Delphi for validity analysis with the users of the questionnaire. In stages 3 and 5, the items were judged based on face validity, content validity, and utility and viability, by a 1-7 Likert scale (cut-off point: median < 6). Accuracy and reliability of the questionnaire were analyzed with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS The initial version of the instrument (98 items) was adapted during stages 1 to 3 for the final version with 40 items, which were considered relevant, of adequate content, useful, and viable. The instrument has 2 dimensions and 9 subdimensions, and the items have closed-ended questions (yes or no). The software for the automatic collection and analysis generates indicators, tables, and automatic graphs for the assessed institution and aggregated data. The adjustment indices confirmed a bi-dimensional model composed of structure and process (X2/gl = 1.070, RMSEA ≤ 0.05 = 0.847, TLI = 0.972), with high reliability for the AGRASS Questionnaire (α = 0.94) and process dimension (α = 0.93), and adequate for the structural dimension (α = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS The AGRASS Questionnaire is a potentially useful instrument for the surveillance and monitoring of the risk management and patient safety in health services.
id USP-23_43c8c2eb0d91157906a992c105e37fb5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102020000100217
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health CarePatient SafetyRisk ManagementValidation StudiesABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the development and the validity analysis of the Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care Questionnaire (AGRASS). METHODS This is a validation study of a measurement instrument following the stages: 1) Development of conceptual model and items; 2) Formal multidisciplinary assessment; 3) Nominal group for validity analysis with national specialists; 4) Development of software and national pilot study in 62 Brazilian hospitals 5) Delphi for validity analysis with the users of the questionnaire. In stages 3 and 5, the items were judged based on face validity, content validity, and utility and viability, by a 1-7 Likert scale (cut-off point: median < 6). Accuracy and reliability of the questionnaire were analyzed with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS The initial version of the instrument (98 items) was adapted during stages 1 to 3 for the final version with 40 items, which were considered relevant, of adequate content, useful, and viable. The instrument has 2 dimensions and 9 subdimensions, and the items have closed-ended questions (yes or no). The software for the automatic collection and analysis generates indicators, tables, and automatic graphs for the assessed institution and aggregated data. The adjustment indices confirmed a bi-dimensional model composed of structure and process (X2/gl = 1.070, RMSEA ≤ 0.05 = 0.847, TLI = 0.972), with high reliability for the AGRASS Questionnaire (α = 0.94) and process dimension (α = 0.93), and adequate for the structural dimension (α = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS The AGRASS Questionnaire is a potentially useful instrument for the surveillance and monitoring of the risk management and patient safety in health services.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100217Revista de Saúde Pública v.54 2020reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001335info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGama,Zenewton André da SilvaSaturno-Hernandez,Pedro JesusCaldas,Anna Claudia Sales GomesFreitas,Marise Reis deMendonça,Ana Elza Oliveira deMedeiros,Carlos Alexandre de SouzaMedeiros,Wilton RodriguesKessler,OliverSoares,Diogo Penhaeng2020-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102020000100217Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2020-02-06T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
title AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
spellingShingle AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
Gama,Zenewton André da Silva
Patient Safety
Risk Management
Validation Studies
title_short AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
title_full AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
title_fullStr AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
title_full_unstemmed AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
title_sort AGRASS Questionnaire: Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care
author Gama,Zenewton André da Silva
author_facet Gama,Zenewton André da Silva
Saturno-Hernandez,Pedro Jesus
Caldas,Anna Claudia Sales Gomes
Freitas,Marise Reis de
Mendonça,Ana Elza Oliveira de
Medeiros,Carlos Alexandre de Souza
Medeiros,Wilton Rodrigues
Kessler,Oliver
Soares,Diogo Penha
author_role author
author2 Saturno-Hernandez,Pedro Jesus
Caldas,Anna Claudia Sales Gomes
Freitas,Marise Reis de
Mendonça,Ana Elza Oliveira de
Medeiros,Carlos Alexandre de Souza
Medeiros,Wilton Rodrigues
Kessler,Oliver
Soares,Diogo Penha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gama,Zenewton André da Silva
Saturno-Hernandez,Pedro Jesus
Caldas,Anna Claudia Sales Gomes
Freitas,Marise Reis de
Mendonça,Ana Elza Oliveira de
Medeiros,Carlos Alexandre de Souza
Medeiros,Wilton Rodrigues
Kessler,Oliver
Soares,Diogo Penha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patient Safety
Risk Management
Validation Studies
topic Patient Safety
Risk Management
Validation Studies
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the development and the validity analysis of the Assessment of Risk Management in Health Care Questionnaire (AGRASS). METHODS This is a validation study of a measurement instrument following the stages: 1) Development of conceptual model and items; 2) Formal multidisciplinary assessment; 3) Nominal group for validity analysis with national specialists; 4) Development of software and national pilot study in 62 Brazilian hospitals 5) Delphi for validity analysis with the users of the questionnaire. In stages 3 and 5, the items were judged based on face validity, content validity, and utility and viability, by a 1-7 Likert scale (cut-off point: median < 6). Accuracy and reliability of the questionnaire were analyzed with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS The initial version of the instrument (98 items) was adapted during stages 1 to 3 for the final version with 40 items, which were considered relevant, of adequate content, useful, and viable. The instrument has 2 dimensions and 9 subdimensions, and the items have closed-ended questions (yes or no). The software for the automatic collection and analysis generates indicators, tables, and automatic graphs for the assessed institution and aggregated data. The adjustment indices confirmed a bi-dimensional model composed of structure and process (X2/gl = 1.070, RMSEA ≤ 0.05 = 0.847, TLI = 0.972), with high reliability for the AGRASS Questionnaire (α = 0.94) and process dimension (α = 0.93), and adequate for the structural dimension (α = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS The AGRASS Questionnaire is a potentially useful instrument for the surveillance and monitoring of the risk management and patient safety in health services.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100217
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102020000100217
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001335
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.54 2020
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936505653460992