Follow-up of children diagnosed with deafness in a neonatal hearing screening program in Manaus

• Autor(a) principal: Botelho, João Bosco Lopes
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Carvalho, Diego Monteiro de, Santos-Melo, Giane Zupellari dos, Neto, José Cardoso, Nascimento, Samuel Machado do, Figueiredo, Wenberger Lanza Daniel de, Lacerda, Larissa Abreu, Nogueira, Kristian Holanda
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
• Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/206152
• topic: Crianças com Deficiência; Triagem Neonatal; Surdez, diagnóstico; Correção de Deficiência Auditiva, tendências; Perda de Seguimento; Centros de Reabilitação; Qualidade, Acesso e Avaliação da Assistência à Saúde; Disabled Children; Neonatal Screening; Deafness, diagnosis; Correction of Hearing Impairment, trends; Lost to Follow-Up; Rehabilitation Centers; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the follow-up of children diagnosed with deafness in neonatal hearing screening and risk factors for hearing loss. METHODS: Quantitative, cross-sectional, and retrospective study to evaluate factors associated with hearing loss and the follow-up of cases of children diagnosed with audiological dysfunction, by analyzing electronic medical records of 5,305 children referred to a Specialized Center in Type I Rehabilitation, from January/2016 to February/2020, in the city of Manaus, Amazonas. The statistical study used Pearson’s chi-square test and binary logistic regression in which odds ratio scans were obtained with reliability intervals of 95%. RESULTS: Of the 5,305 children referred for the otoacoustic emission retest, 366 (6.9%) failed the retest. Children diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss continued in the study, totaling 265 (72.4%). Only 58 (21.9%) children continued in the study to its end, of these 39 had received hearing aids at that point; and 16 (41%) had surgical indication for cochlear implants, of which only 3 (18.7%) had undergone surgery. Among the risk factors for hearing loss, we found 2.6 times more chance of failure in the otoacoustic emissions retest in those children who had a family history of hearing loss and ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Although the screening flow reaches a large part of live births, the dropout rates during the process are high, therefore, the socioeconomic and geographic characteristics of regions such as the Amazon should be considered as relevant factors to the evasion of rehabilitation programs of these children. Hospitalization in the neonatal ICU and family history of hearing loss in the investigations could be identified as the main and most important factors for alteration of the otoacoustic emissions retests.