Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romero-Vega,Liliana
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Pacheco,Oscar, la Hoz-Restrepo,Fernando de, Díaz-Quijano,Fredi Alexander
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000600899
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of dengue fever reports and how they relate to the definition of case and severity. METHODS Diagnostic test assessment was conducted using cross-sectional sampling from a universe of 13,873 patients treated during the fifth epidemiological period in health institutions from 11 Colombian departments in 2013. The test under analyses was the reporting to the National Public Health Surveillance System, and the reference standard was the review of histories identified by active institutional search. We reviewed all histories of patients diagnosed with dengue fever, as well as a random sample of patients with febrile syndromes. The specificity and sensitivity of reports were estimated for this purpose, considering the inverse of the probability of being selected for weighting. The concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search was calculated using Kappa statistics. RESULTS We included 4,359 febrile patients, and 31.7% were classified as compatible with dengue fever (17 with severe dengue fever; 461 with dengue fever and warning signs; 904 with dengue fever and no warning signs). The global sensitivity of reports was 13.2% (95%CI 10.9;15.4) and specificity was 98.4% (95%CI 97.9;98.9). Sensitivity varied according to severity: 12.1% (95%CI 9.3;14.8) for patients presenting dengue fever with no warning signs; 14.5% (95%CI 10.6;18.4) for those presenting dengue fever with warning signs, and 40.0% (95%CI 9.6;70.4) for those with severe dengue fever. Concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search resulted in a Kappa of 10.1%. CONCLUSIONS Low concordance was observed between reporting and the review of clinical histories, which was associated with the low reporting of dengue fever compatible cases, especially milder cases.
id USP-23_603f56441481e9cc979a15d915d5bd74
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102014000600899
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, ColombiaDengue, epidemiologyEpidemics, statistics & numerical dataDisease NotificationSensitivity and SpecificityEpidemiological Surveillance OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of dengue fever reports and how they relate to the definition of case and severity. METHODS Diagnostic test assessment was conducted using cross-sectional sampling from a universe of 13,873 patients treated during the fifth epidemiological period in health institutions from 11 Colombian departments in 2013. The test under analyses was the reporting to the National Public Health Surveillance System, and the reference standard was the review of histories identified by active institutional search. We reviewed all histories of patients diagnosed with dengue fever, as well as a random sample of patients with febrile syndromes. The specificity and sensitivity of reports were estimated for this purpose, considering the inverse of the probability of being selected for weighting. The concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search was calculated using Kappa statistics. RESULTS We included 4,359 febrile patients, and 31.7% were classified as compatible with dengue fever (17 with severe dengue fever; 461 with dengue fever and warning signs; 904 with dengue fever and no warning signs). The global sensitivity of reports was 13.2% (95%CI 10.9;15.4) and specificity was 98.4% (95%CI 97.9;98.9). Sensitivity varied according to severity: 12.1% (95%CI 9.3;14.8) for patients presenting dengue fever with no warning signs; 14.5% (95%CI 10.6;18.4) for those presenting dengue fever with warning signs, and 40.0% (95%CI 9.6;70.4) for those with severe dengue fever. Concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search resulted in a Kappa of 10.1%. CONCLUSIONS Low concordance was observed between reporting and the review of clinical histories, which was associated with the low reporting of dengue fever compatible cases, especially milder cases.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000600899Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.6 2014reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005321info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomero-Vega,LilianaPacheco,Oscarla Hoz-Restrepo,Fernando deDíaz-Quijano,Fredi Alexandereng2020-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102014000600899Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2020-04-24T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
title Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
spellingShingle Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
Romero-Vega,Liliana
Dengue, epidemiology
Epidemics, statistics & numerical data
Disease Notification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Epidemiological Surveillance
title_short Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
title_full Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
title_fullStr Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
title_sort Evaluation of dengue fever reports during an epidemic, Colombia
author Romero-Vega,Liliana
author_facet Romero-Vega,Liliana
Pacheco,Oscar
la Hoz-Restrepo,Fernando de
Díaz-Quijano,Fredi Alexander
author_role author
author2 Pacheco,Oscar
la Hoz-Restrepo,Fernando de
Díaz-Quijano,Fredi Alexander
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romero-Vega,Liliana
Pacheco,Oscar
la Hoz-Restrepo,Fernando de
Díaz-Quijano,Fredi Alexander
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dengue, epidemiology
Epidemics, statistics & numerical data
Disease Notification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Epidemiological Surveillance
topic Dengue, epidemiology
Epidemics, statistics & numerical data
Disease Notification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Epidemiological Surveillance
description OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of dengue fever reports and how they relate to the definition of case and severity. METHODS Diagnostic test assessment was conducted using cross-sectional sampling from a universe of 13,873 patients treated during the fifth epidemiological period in health institutions from 11 Colombian departments in 2013. The test under analyses was the reporting to the National Public Health Surveillance System, and the reference standard was the review of histories identified by active institutional search. We reviewed all histories of patients diagnosed with dengue fever, as well as a random sample of patients with febrile syndromes. The specificity and sensitivity of reports were estimated for this purpose, considering the inverse of the probability of being selected for weighting. The concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search was calculated using Kappa statistics. RESULTS We included 4,359 febrile patients, and 31.7% were classified as compatible with dengue fever (17 with severe dengue fever; 461 with dengue fever and warning signs; 904 with dengue fever and no warning signs). The global sensitivity of reports was 13.2% (95%CI 10.9;15.4) and specificity was 98.4% (95%CI 97.9;98.9). Sensitivity varied according to severity: 12.1% (95%CI 9.3;14.8) for patients presenting dengue fever with no warning signs; 14.5% (95%CI 10.6;18.4) for those presenting dengue fever with warning signs, and 40.0% (95%CI 9.6;70.4) for those with severe dengue fever. Concordance between reporting and the findings of the active institutional search resulted in a Kappa of 10.1%. CONCLUSIONS Low concordance was observed between reporting and the review of clinical histories, which was associated with the low reporting of dengue fever compatible cases, especially milder cases.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000600899
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102014000600899
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.48 n.6 2014
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936502839083008