Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Entringer,Aline Piovezan
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Pinto,Márcia, Gomes,Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100273
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of natural childbirth and elective C-section for normal risk pregnant women. METHODS The study was conducted from the perspective of supplemental health, a health subsystem that finances private obstetric care, represented in Brazil by health plan operators. The reference populations were normal risk pregnant women, who could undergo natural childbirth or elective C-section, subdivided into primiparous and multiparous women with previous uterine scar. A decision analysis model was constructed including choice of delivery types and health consequences for mother and newborn, from admission for delivery to maternity hospital discharge. Effectiveness measures were identified from the scientific literature, and cost data obtained by consultation with health professionals, health plan operators’ pricing tables, and pricing reference publications of health resources. RESULTS Natural childbirth was dominant compared with elective C-section for primiparous normal risk pregnant women, presenting lower cost (R$5,210.96 versus R$5,753.54) and better or equal effectiveness for all evaluated outcomes. For multiparous women with previous uterine scar, C-section presented lower cost (R$5,364.07) than natural childbirth (R$5,632.24), and better or equal effectiveness; therefore, C-section is more efficient for this population. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to control and audit C-sections without clinical indication, especially with regard to primiparous women, contributing to the management of perinatal care.
id USP-23_66e666ce1cec353b34bfe663fddaa0cb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-89102018000100273
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental healthNatural Childbirth, economicsCesarean Section, economicsCost-Effectiveness EvaluationSupplemental HealthABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of natural childbirth and elective C-section for normal risk pregnant women. METHODS The study was conducted from the perspective of supplemental health, a health subsystem that finances private obstetric care, represented in Brazil by health plan operators. The reference populations were normal risk pregnant women, who could undergo natural childbirth or elective C-section, subdivided into primiparous and multiparous women with previous uterine scar. A decision analysis model was constructed including choice of delivery types and health consequences for mother and newborn, from admission for delivery to maternity hospital discharge. Effectiveness measures were identified from the scientific literature, and cost data obtained by consultation with health professionals, health plan operators’ pricing tables, and pricing reference publications of health resources. RESULTS Natural childbirth was dominant compared with elective C-section for primiparous normal risk pregnant women, presenting lower cost (R$5,210.96 versus R$5,753.54) and better or equal effectiveness for all evaluated outcomes. For multiparous women with previous uterine scar, C-section presented lower cost (R$5,364.07) than natural childbirth (R$5,632.24), and better or equal effectiveness; therefore, C-section is more efficient for this population. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to control and audit C-sections without clinical indication, especially with regard to primiparous women, contributing to the management of perinatal care.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100273Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 2018reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000373info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEntringer,Aline PiovezanPinto,MárciaGomes,Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendeseng2018-11-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102018000100273Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2018-11-13T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
spellingShingle Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
Entringer,Aline Piovezan
Natural Childbirth, economics
Cesarean Section, economics
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Supplemental Health
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
title_sort Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health
author Entringer,Aline Piovezan
author_facet Entringer,Aline Piovezan
Pinto,Márcia
Gomes,Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes
author_role author
author2 Pinto,Márcia
Gomes,Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Entringer,Aline Piovezan
Pinto,Márcia
Gomes,Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Natural Childbirth, economics
Cesarean Section, economics
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Supplemental Health
topic Natural Childbirth, economics
Cesarean Section, economics
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Supplemental Health
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of natural childbirth and elective C-section for normal risk pregnant women. METHODS The study was conducted from the perspective of supplemental health, a health subsystem that finances private obstetric care, represented in Brazil by health plan operators. The reference populations were normal risk pregnant women, who could undergo natural childbirth or elective C-section, subdivided into primiparous and multiparous women with previous uterine scar. A decision analysis model was constructed including choice of delivery types and health consequences for mother and newborn, from admission for delivery to maternity hospital discharge. Effectiveness measures were identified from the scientific literature, and cost data obtained by consultation with health professionals, health plan operators’ pricing tables, and pricing reference publications of health resources. RESULTS Natural childbirth was dominant compared with elective C-section for primiparous normal risk pregnant women, presenting lower cost (R$5,210.96 versus R$5,753.54) and better or equal effectiveness for all evaluated outcomes. For multiparous women with previous uterine scar, C-section presented lower cost (R$5,364.07) than natural childbirth (R$5,632.24), and better or equal effectiveness; therefore, C-section is more efficient for this population. CONCLUSIONS It is necessary to control and audit C-sections without clinical indication, especially with regard to primiparous women, contributing to the management of perinatal care.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100273
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102018000100273
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000373
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública v.52 2018
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1748936504776851456