Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Teixeira, Juliana Araújo, Sales, Cristiane Hermes, Castro, Michelle Alessandra de, Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão, Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto, Goldbaum, Moisés, Marchioni, Dirce Maria, Fisberg, Regina Mara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/130834
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To validate the self-reported diabetes mellitus in adults and older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS We have used data of 569 subjects (284 adults and 285 older adults), participants of the population-based cross-sectional study Inquérito de Saúde do Município de São Paulo (Health Survey of São Paulo). Fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) and/or use of drugs (oral hypoglycemic and/or insulin) defined the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We have validated the self-reported diabetes mellitus by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. We have used Poisson regression with robust variance to verify the factors associated with the sensitivity of the self-reported datum. For all analyses, we have considered the sample design of the study. RESULTS The sensitivity of self-reported diabetes mellitus was 63.8% (95%CI 49.2–76.3), specificity was 99.7% (95%CI 99.1–99.9), positive predictive value was 95.5% (95%CI 84.4–98.8), and negative predictive value was 96.9% (95%CI 94.9–98.2). The correct reporting of diabetes mellitus was more prevalent among older adults (PR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2–3.5) than among adults. CONCLUSIONS The use of the datum of self-reported diabetes mellitus is valid, especially among older adults living in the city of São Paulo. The results highlight the need to track diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic subjects who have one or more risk factors for it, mainly in the adult population of this city.
id USP-23_6cc4cb651571339399f0114d80ddc684
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/130834
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo cityDiabetes MellitusepidemiologyDiagnostic Self EvaluationHealth SurveysReproducibility of ResultsValidation StudiesOBJECTIVE To validate the self-reported diabetes mellitus in adults and older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS We have used data of 569 subjects (284 adults and 285 older adults), participants of the population-based cross-sectional study Inquérito de Saúde do Município de São Paulo (Health Survey of São Paulo). Fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) and/or use of drugs (oral hypoglycemic and/or insulin) defined the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We have validated the self-reported diabetes mellitus by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. We have used Poisson regression with robust variance to verify the factors associated with the sensitivity of the self-reported datum. For all analyses, we have considered the sample design of the study. RESULTS The sensitivity of self-reported diabetes mellitus was 63.8% (95%CI 49.2–76.3), specificity was 99.7% (95%CI 99.1–99.9), positive predictive value was 95.5% (95%CI 84.4–98.8), and negative predictive value was 96.9% (95%CI 94.9–98.2). The correct reporting of diabetes mellitus was more prevalent among older adults (PR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2–3.5) than among adults. CONCLUSIONS The use of the datum of self-reported diabetes mellitus is valid, especially among older adults living in the city of São Paulo. The results highlight the need to track diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic subjects who have one or more risk factors for it, mainly in the adult population of this city.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/13083410.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006378Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 51 (2017); 20Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 51 (2017); 20Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 51 (2017); 201518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/130834/127268Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFontanelli, Mariane de MelloTeixeira, Juliana AraújoSales, Cristiane HermesCastro, Michelle Alessandra deCesar, Chester Luiz GalvãoAlves, Maria Cecilia Goi PortoGoldbaum, MoisésMarchioni, Dirce MariaFisberg, Regina Mara2017-12-14T10:16:01Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/130834Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2017-12-14T10:16:01Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
title Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
spellingShingle Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
Diabetes Mellitus
epidemiology
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Health Surveys
Reproducibility of Results
Validation Studies
title_short Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
title_full Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
title_fullStr Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
title_full_unstemmed Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
title_sort Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city
author Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
author_facet Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
Teixeira, Juliana Araújo
Sales, Cristiane Hermes
Castro, Michelle Alessandra de
Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão
Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Goldbaum, Moisés
Marchioni, Dirce Maria
Fisberg, Regina Mara
author_role author
author2 Teixeira, Juliana Araújo
Sales, Cristiane Hermes
Castro, Michelle Alessandra de
Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão
Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Goldbaum, Moisés
Marchioni, Dirce Maria
Fisberg, Regina Mara
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fontanelli, Mariane de Mello
Teixeira, Juliana Araújo
Sales, Cristiane Hermes
Castro, Michelle Alessandra de
Cesar, Chester Luiz Galvão
Alves, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto
Goldbaum, Moisés
Marchioni, Dirce Maria
Fisberg, Regina Mara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes Mellitus
epidemiology
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Health Surveys
Reproducibility of Results
Validation Studies
topic Diabetes Mellitus
epidemiology
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Health Surveys
Reproducibility of Results
Validation Studies
description OBJECTIVE To validate the self-reported diabetes mellitus in adults and older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS We have used data of 569 subjects (284 adults and 285 older adults), participants of the population-based cross-sectional study Inquérito de Saúde do Município de São Paulo (Health Survey of São Paulo). Fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) and/or use of drugs (oral hypoglycemic and/or insulin) defined the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We have validated the self-reported diabetes mellitus by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. We have used Poisson regression with robust variance to verify the factors associated with the sensitivity of the self-reported datum. For all analyses, we have considered the sample design of the study. RESULTS The sensitivity of self-reported diabetes mellitus was 63.8% (95%CI 49.2–76.3), specificity was 99.7% (95%CI 99.1–99.9), positive predictive value was 95.5% (95%CI 84.4–98.8), and negative predictive value was 96.9% (95%CI 94.9–98.2). The correct reporting of diabetes mellitus was more prevalent among older adults (PR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2–3.5) than among adults. CONCLUSIONS The use of the datum of self-reported diabetes mellitus is valid, especially among older adults living in the city of São Paulo. The results highlight the need to track diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic subjects who have one or more risk factors for it, mainly in the adult population of this city.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/130834
10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006378
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/130834
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006378
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/130834/127268
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 51 (2017); 20
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 51 (2017); 20
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 51 (2017); 20
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221798313230336